<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Nikon D300s Hands On Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/01/28/the-nikon-d300s-camera-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/01/28/the-nikon-d300s-camera-review/</link>
	<description>Digital Camera and Lens Reviews for Enthusiasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiunn-Kai Wang</title>
		<link>http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/01/28/the-nikon-d300s-camera-review/#comment-148780</link>
		<dc:creator>Jiunn-Kai Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/?p=4040#comment-148780</guid>
		<description>Steve,

You mentioned 18-200 mm Zoom lens on this review. I bought one on May 2007. During that time it was so popular. Most of the vendor can sell it within minutes after they posted in stock.

After 4 yrs 9 months and more than 9000 shots, the lens is quite creepy. There is a lot of side play between outer barrel and middle barrel. The lens extended to the far end by itself when it&#039;s point down(too heavy on D50).

A co-worker from NJ division came to Phoenix, he saw some notes I had on the table(about f-stop and shutter speed). We started to talk about photography. He is a Nikon shooter and has a D7000. He gave me a lot of information he collected over the years(6 GB). He showed me the assembly drawing about 18-200 mm zoom lens (14 pages pdf file). I was amazed how complicated this lens is. The parts list has 11 pages.

I send an email to B&amp;H (where I bought it from) whether it will be cover by warranty. They send me Nikon support phone number. After I contacted them, I got a case number and address (in CA) to send in my lens. They received  it last Friday. I got a Nikon Service Acknowledgement/Estimate email yesterday morning. The following is the status. CAT (B2-Moderate repair: Major parts replaced.) 


Status	              code	Serial No	     Description  	              CAT  	Problem  	            Charges
Estimate Accepted 
02/06/2012	      2159	  2732046 	Service Repair Rank B2	B2	• FOCUS 
                                                                                                        • LENS CREEPS.
                                                                                                          NOT SHARP 
                                                                                                                                 $0.00 USD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>You mentioned 18-200 mm Zoom lens on this review. I bought one on May 2007. During that time it was so popular. Most of the vendor can sell it within minutes after they posted in stock.</p>
<p>After 4 yrs 9 months and more than 9000 shots, the lens is quite creepy. There is a lot of side play between outer barrel and middle barrel. The lens extended to the far end by itself when it&#8217;s point down(too heavy on D50).</p>
<p>A co-worker from NJ division came to Phoenix, he saw some notes I had on the table(about f-stop and shutter speed). We started to talk about photography. He is a Nikon shooter and has a D7000. He gave me a lot of information he collected over the years(6 GB). He showed me the assembly drawing about 18-200 mm zoom lens (14 pages pdf file). I was amazed how complicated this lens is. The parts list has 11 pages.</p>
<p>I send an email to B&amp;H (where I bought it from) whether it will be cover by warranty. They send me Nikon support phone number. After I contacted them, I got a case number and address (in CA) to send in my lens. They received  it last Friday. I got a Nikon Service Acknowledgement/Estimate email yesterday morning. The following is the status. CAT (B2-Moderate repair: Major parts replaced.) </p>
<p>Status	              code	Serial No	     Description  	              CAT  	Problem  	            Charges<br />
Estimate Accepted<br />
02/06/2012	      2159	  2732046 	Service Repair Rank B2	B2	• FOCUS<br />
                                                                                                        • LENS CREEPS.<br />
                                                                                                          NOT SHARP<br />
                                                                                                                                 $0.00 USD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Pepin</title>
		<link>http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/01/28/the-nikon-d300s-camera-review/#comment-27853</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Pepin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/?p=4040#comment-27853</guid>
		<description>It has great output for portrait images, nikon colours are ever so slightly different then canon, and your raw converter will matter more then what brand you use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has great output for portrait images, nikon colours are ever so slightly different then canon, and your raw converter will matter more then what brand you use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hylton Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/01/28/the-nikon-d300s-camera-review/#comment-11952</link>
		<dc:creator>Hylton Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/?p=4040#comment-11952</guid>
		<description>How would you tweak D300s to give good output for portrait images?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you tweak D300s to give good output for portrait images?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Hager</title>
		<link>http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/01/28/the-nikon-d300s-camera-review/#comment-8300</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Hager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 14:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/?p=4040#comment-8300</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve,
I&#039;m currently selling my Nikon FM3A and the three primes I got for it, since I decided to go digital. I really like the feel, ruggedness and looks of the Pentax K-7 and have read your review. Still, everybody I ask in stores tries to convince me to go for the Nikon D90, which doesn&#039;t seem the least bit attractive to me. But the 16-85 seems interesting, since that&#039;s the exact range in a zoom I&#039;d need. The folks in the stores, though, all claim the D300s were so much better image quality wise than the K7, especially above ISO800.
Could you give me your two cents&#039; worth of advice to help me make my decision easier, or refer me to an answer you&#039;ve given before on that topic? I&#039;d really appreciate.

Thanks,
Markus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,<br />
I&#8217;m currently selling my Nikon FM3A and the three primes I got for it, since I decided to go digital. I really like the feel, ruggedness and looks of the Pentax K-7 and have read your review. Still, everybody I ask in stores tries to convince me to go for the Nikon D90, which doesn&#8217;t seem the least bit attractive to me. But the 16-85 seems interesting, since that&#8217;s the exact range in a zoom I&#8217;d need. The folks in the stores, though, all claim the D300s were so much better image quality wise than the K7, especially above ISO800.<br />
Could you give me your two cents&#8217; worth of advice to help me make my decision easier, or refer me to an answer you&#8217;ve given before on that topic? I&#8217;d really appreciate.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Markus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eeraj</title>
		<link>http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/01/28/the-nikon-d300s-camera-review/#comment-8255</link>
		<dc:creator>Eeraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 02:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/?p=4040#comment-8255</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve,

  Came across your site via Google. I quite like your writing and reviews. I recently purchase a Leica X1. Do you have any comments on how the X1 compares to D300s in image quality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,</p>
<p>  Came across your site via Google. I quite like your writing and reviews. I recently purchase a Leica X1. Do you have any comments on how the X1 compares to D300s in image quality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christie Amyot</title>
		<link>http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/01/28/the-nikon-d300s-camera-review/#comment-2018</link>
		<dc:creator>Christie Amyot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/?p=4040#comment-2018</guid>
		<description>Hey Steve,
Thanks for your excellent reviews! You are my #1 source for everything Leica.
Anyway, about the 7D review, when is it coming?
This is a camera I am specifically am interested in and am dying to see your in depth look at it!
Thanks again,
Christie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve,<br />
Thanks for your excellent reviews! You are my #1 source for everything Leica.<br />
Anyway, about the 7D review, when is it coming?<br />
This is a camera I am specifically am interested in and am dying to see your in depth look at it!<br />
Thanks again,<br />
Christie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Huff</title>
		<link>http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/01/28/the-nikon-d300s-camera-review/#comment-1951</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Huff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/?p=4040#comment-1951</guid>
		<description>Hey Josh, for MF I would recommend the Kats Eye. You can MF with the included screen, but the Kats Eye is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Josh, for MF I would recommend the Kats Eye. You can MF with the included screen, but the Kats Eye is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sobel</title>
		<link>http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/01/28/the-nikon-d300s-camera-review/#comment-1900</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sobel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/?p=4040#comment-1900</guid>
		<description>Steve,
Your reviews are terrific. I would be interested in your thoughts on manual focusing with a Nikon DSLR. Would you use the matt focus screen that comes with the camera, or would you replace it with a Kats Eye focus screen for more accuracy? 
Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,<br />
Your reviews are terrific. I would be interested in your thoughts on manual focusing with a Nikon DSLR. Would you use the matt focus screen that comes with the camera, or would you replace it with a Kats Eye focus screen for more accuracy?<br />
Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akram Reda</title>
		<link>http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/01/28/the-nikon-d300s-camera-review/#comment-1899</link>
		<dc:creator>Akram Reda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/?p=4040#comment-1899</guid>
		<description>Thanks Steve, looking forward to your future reviews and any comparison on D 700 / Zeiss combination and Leicas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Steve, looking forward to your future reviews and any comparison on D 700 / Zeiss combination and Leicas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Huff</title>
		<link>http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2010/01/28/the-nikon-d300s-camera-review/#comment-1898</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Huff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/?p=4040#comment-1898</guid>
		<description>Akram, the D300s can be tweaked for fairly natural output. The M9 color is different than other digitals I have shot with. Not necessarily better, just different. For me, the Nikon D300 always gave me punchier results than Canon. Leica is in the middle with its own kind of color and look, and is what I prefer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Akram, the D300s can be tweaked for fairly natural output. The M9 color is different than other digitals I have shot with. Not necessarily better, just different. For me, the Nikon D300 always gave me punchier results than Canon. Leica is in the middle with its own kind of color and look, and is what I prefer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 7/15 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 480/481 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.stevehuffphoto.com @ 2012-02-09 07:50:03 -->
