Using the Nikon DF By Cosmin Munteanu

Using the Nikon DF

By Cosmin Munteanu

nikon_df

Only for a couple of weeks the local Nikon dealer lend me silver/chrome Df in exchange for a short review about it. Well, the time was not a problem, especially because I have the camera for about three weekends. I had previously experience with Nikon AF system already. The F80 was my first camera and the 50mm f:1.8 AF-D. After it came the Nikkor 35mm f:2.0 AF-D and then the D90 followed by a 24mm f:2.8 and an older Sigma AF tele-zoom lens.

I received the Df with its kit lens, the 50mm f:1.8 AF-S G Special Edition. At first, the camera seems big. And it really is, big and bulky. It can not fit in my Tamrac day by day bag (a Explorer 1 5501). That’s the same bag that can accommodate a Pentax ME or MX with two prime lenses and a medium-zoom or a Nikon F80 with 2 prime lenses and a couple of film rolls. So, I had to leave the Tamrac at home and took my girlfriend’s LowePro backpack. Also, I brought with me my favorite Nikkor, the 35mm f:2.0. Well, as bulky as it is, in fact when I grabbed it, surprise! The camera is much lighter than looks like and sits itself in my hands quite well. It’s almost like Minolta’s x-500 or x-700 but of course with at least a measure bigger, and heavier (~750 g vs. Minolta’s 500 g). The grip, or in fact its luck is not at all a problem. It is big enough for me to hold the camera comfortably.

Now, let’s speak about using it in the real world. At first if you come from a classical 35mm film camera, at least the Df’s top seems very familiar. There are dials for exposure time, exposure compensation and ISO but, surprisingly also an exposure mode switch (PASM). Why such a dial when an “A” on the shutter dial would have been enough? Ah, of course, the new G lenses does not have an aperture ring, so the photographer have to tell to the camera in what mode wants to work. The aperture can be adjusted through the main back dial as on other Nikon dSLRs ar the front dial but I would not recommend that. The front dial is very stiff and can not be used comfortably and quickly because of that. I don’t recommend using this one while taking pictures. If one wants to use the aperture ring to change the f value, first has to make a visit in the camera’s menu. In these conditions the user can photograph like with a film camera. As for the shutter dial, I would have wanted an “A” position. Also the same would be great on the ISO dial too. Now, to switch from Manual to auto iso and vice versa I have to consult, again, the menu.

Other then the retro looking and operating cameras’s top, the camera behaves like a “normal” Nikon dSLR. The viewfinder is big and bright but of course not as big as a manual focusing camera. A split screen would have been a good addition if not necessary, especially for the “Pure photography” believers. I don’t know why they didn’t implement it. This feature would have picked up the DF even more from the “big black dSLR” crowd. The AF system is very good, fast, but struggles a little in low light by not locking on the target. In the same light conditions even the older D90 can surpass it with its central AF point. Shutter sound is short and ferm, not too loud but also not silky smooth as F80’s one. Even if the specifications says that the camera is weather resistant, the kit lens is not, and because I don’t have a WR lens for Nikon I didn’t try the camera in rainy conditions.

The battery life is very good but the door of the memory card/battery compartment is very fragile. Yes, both card and battery share the same compartment which door opens and closes in the same way like Nikon F100’s R6 battery holder.
About the sensor what to say more that I don’t need more that it can deliver. The IQ is excellent, ISO performance outstanding, plenty DR. I can not add nothing cons on this matter.

How would I like to see a future Df2 ? Well, I would keep the sensor, make the camera smaller, by about 5-7mm in deep and around ~10-12mm in height. Also I would like a more sturdy construction, keep the weather sealing and with a much less flimsy battery/card door and a better AF system but not by adding more AF points but by making it more reliable. Also i see a better spread of the AF points on the entire focusing screen’s surface unlike in the case of the present Df. In addition, like mentioned previously, a split screen would be nicer or a better suited for manual focusing matte screen. Keeping the 100% viewfinder’s coverage of course is a must and rising the magnification to at least x0.85 would make the Df2 the dSLR with the biggest optical viewfinder. Despite the cons mentioned the Df is simply put, a daily camera, one that I would always carry with me, paired with one, maybe two small, light and fast prime lenses like Nikkors the 50mm f:1.8, 50mm f:1.4, 35mm f:2.0, 35mm f:1.8, 28mm f:2.8, 24mm f:2.8, 20mm f:2.8 are .

I won’t end this short description wishing you “good light”. In the Df’s case this would be outdated. So I wish you just to be there, where the things happen and don’t worry too much about the selected ISO 😉
Have fun.

street 30

street 1

street 2

street 6

street 9

street 10

street 14

street 16

street 17

street 20

street 27

Related Post

27 Comments

  1. Surprising that people are still writing articles about old fashioned cameras. The new iPhone 6 with all its features will shorten the life of a stand alone camera even further. And rightly so. Sure, there’s still a market for them, but only if you’re stuck in the past. Welcome to the new world everyone!

    • Hi Ron:- You may be right. Already DSLR sales are down but mirrorless sales are up. Also nowadays people do not print but rather they put images up on the net and FB etc. However I think there will be the enthusiasts and the purists that shoot with cameras 🙂 that will never change.

      • @Andrew: the latest CIPA figures say something else. Camera sales have halved, mirrorless and dslr follow that same trend, mirrorless not making any real inroads on dslr sales.

        Check your facts.

      • I agree there will be still be a market for real cameras, but just for enthusiasts and professionals. The market is getting smaller and smaller. It wouldn’t surprise me if some companies announce the demise of their camera division within a few years. I predict Sony will just be mobile and TV within a few years. And brands such as Fujifilm and Olympus should start thinking about making phones with built-in cameras! 🙂

    • Wow, where to begin with that one…

      I’ll just quote Darth Vader: “Don’t be too proud of this technological [marvel they’ve] constructed. The ability [of an iPhone] is insignificant next to the power of [a real camera].

      😉

      • It’s not about the power of a real camera. I actually love real cameras. It’s about what 99% of population is/will be using for easy sharing and easy to carry around purposes.

        • regular ppl wont are not the targets for these cameras or even most cameras reviewed on photography sites. it never has been. you’re drawing a really poor comparison. the market drying up for dslr was exactly because dslr was never for normwl ppl. they just didnt know any better.

          cameras like these are for ppl who are hobbyists and photographers and professionals. the iphone does not change that 1 bit. those who have gone completely mobile phone for their camera needs have never needed more than the most basic function of a camera and IQ and usability was never a concern.

          that target you are talking about is not the target of cameras like the DF. in no world we live in would normal ppl splurge thousands on a cmera like the DF or OMD or XT’s. these are cameras designed for a niche/specific audience. If i’m a race car driver, i couldnt care less if a honda jazz outsold my racer.

    • Ron, it seems very clear from all that drivel, you seem to be missing one important thing: fun! Can you say that shooting with an iPhone is more engaging and satisfying than shooting with something like the Nikon Df? Really?!

        • The fun part is to instantly share your photos on whichever platform you prefer. That is what most people consider fun now. It’s like Polaroid in the past: quick results. Only now to be viewed everywhere on earth instantly. What’s not to like about this?

        • Hi Cosmin! This was (as you will have noticed) a play on the saying “This is all Greek to me!”. Dimitris might also appreciate it.

          What I mean is, your review might not have been as professional as some may like, but at least you tried. More important, I like the way you photograph.

          I tried the Df several times, was very eager to like it, but didn’t. The image quality is great, just great, but the handling just didn’t suit me. I stuck with my 800, now 800E.

          • And this is what I am really grateful about! Thanks a lot, Cosmin, for not giving us another boring scientific test, but letting us take part in your personal experience and feelings about this cam. It’s an amazing machine.
            (Just ignore offensive comments by people who feel an urge to find something bad in everything they read.)

  2. The Df looks like it and it surely performs like it. The main show stopper for me is the lack of an easily replaceable focusing screen. You can buy Chinese 3rd part screens but those can just as well be fitted in your old but still very good D700. I can’t see one good enough reason to buy the Df.

    • If you do not have the knoweledge and the experience to evaluate a camera then better do not do it. It is not a shame not to know something, but it is a shame to pretend that you know. That’s a pity. Sorry my friend. Do not ever forget that experienced and seasoned photographers from all over the world watch this site too. So next time be more careful. Because as a Nikon Photographer and Df owner I regretfully have to comment that your review does not represent anything of the nature and the capabilities of the camera.
      Dimitris V. Georgopoulos
      Photographer at Large
      Athens, Greece.

  3. Great! The contemporary compositions and subjects, and the spontaneous atmosphere makes me remind me iPhone photography, but better.

Comments are closed.