A reader sent this to me last week and though it was kind of…funny. Decided to post it for all of you to enjoy and discuss :)
The Breakup Letter
“Dear Leica M9,
This may come as a shock to you, but I have decided to leave you. I
still love you but I can’t live with you. I’m going back to my old
mistress Canon. She’s not as beautiful as you. I don’t love holding
her the way I love holding you but I cannot live a lie any longer.
I’m tired of missing shots because you’re too difficult to focus
accurately. I mean, you tell me you’re at your best wide open, but you
give me a hit n miss focus system, especially close up
I’m fed up of your crappy lcd screen. You’re so last decade.
And I’ve have enough of standing around waiting for you to let me know
what the image I just shot looks like. If I try to take several shots
at once, you take a hissy hit and make me wait and wait and wait….
And while I’m at it, how come that despite the fact you’re no slapper,
I struggle to get consistently steady images at 1/60. Mistress Canon
has no problem showing me the slow love with her fancy IS. You just
shrug your shoulders at me and make me feel inadequate.
I want to strangle you every time I lift you to my eye and you’re
still asleep. Why do you take so long to wake up?
And did I mention – you’re high maintenance too. Everything about you
is me, me, me. I had to buy a grip just to hold you right. Your lenses
are ridiculously expensive and did I tell you that Madam Zeiss is just
as good. There I said it, your not so special any more.
So I’m asking myself, what do we really have in common?
You’re really not that interested in landscapes
You’re incapable of close ups
You’re temperamental when it comes to portraits
You keep telling me that you’re a street walker. I’m sick and tired of
you dropping names like Henri Cartier Bresson. He was a friend of your
grand fathers. I doubt he’d be that impressed with you.
It’s true that you blend in when I take you out into the street, you
certainly do look the part. But the harsh reality is that I miss more
shots because you’re slow than I do with Canon because she wears
tattoos and gets noticed. In fact you draw more attention to me
because I need to fiddle your focus. Canon is just sooooo fast. Lift
But what has really broken my spirit is the fact that yet again I have
missed a shot because you couldn’t tell me that your lens cap was on.
That was a brilliant image I had, right in your self centred little
frame lines and I blew it because you couldn’t be bothered to let me
know you couldn’t see.
It’s not me Leica, it’s you!
PS – your recent little makeover hasn’t fooled me either. Taking your
badge off and asking me for €500 for your nip n tuck is just taking
the mickey. Goodbye!”
New Seal Album “Soul 2″ to be released in November!
My image from the Paris show made the cover and there are 6-7 more inside the booklet and back cover!
Just found out today that the new Seal Album “Soul 2″ will be released in November, which is extra super cool because my image made the cover! I have to say, I think it is his coolest album cover ever (but I am biased), lol. Anyway, check out the info at SEAL.COM!
BTW, the cover image was shot with a Leica M9 and 50 Noctilux wide open at 0.95 in Paris France!
The Ricoh GXR A12 M-Mount Review – The Digital CL Reborn?
By Ashwin Rao
Visit Ashwins blog HERE – His Flickr HERE – Steves GXR Review HERE
Hi, friends and fellow photographers, today I am bringing to you my real world perspectives on the new Ricoh GXR A12 M-Mount module. For those of you who are not yet aware, Ricoh has been pumping out fantastic compact cameras for several decades now, and their compact line of GRD cameras stands at the forefront of compact cameras designed specifically with photographers in mind. As many of you already know, Ricoh entered the large sensor compact fray nearly 2 years ago with the introduction of the Ricoh GXR. Unlike it’s other compact large-sensor brethren,
Ricoh took a novel design approach of building lens-sensor combos, essentially coupling lenses to a specific sensor tailored to that lenses needs. The GXR modules came in 2 flavors, the A12 modules, which utilize a 1.5x crop APS-C size sensor similar in size to those used in Sony and Nikon SLR cameras, and the P10&S10 modules, which use a much smaller sensor similar to those found in most compact pocket cameras today. Steve reviewed the wonderful 28 mm and 50 mm equivalent A12 modules earlier this year and came away favorably impressed. Despite their best efforts to market the GXR as a versatile compact camera option to compete with the NEX cameras and micro 4/3’s cameras, the GXR has remained a niche product aimed at photographers who appreciate customization and image quality first.
All of that being said, Ricoh recently piqued the curiosity of many Leica M shooters by announcing a new A12 module with a native M mount and a 1.5 crop sensor capable of accepting nearly all Leica M mount lenses ever made. They priced this module at $649, same as the other A12 modules, and reported that the M mount module would also incorporate micro lenses and several other corrective measures to limit vignetting of wide angle lenses mounted on this module. Further, Ricoh reported that the M-mount A12 module would NOT incorporate an anti-Aliasing (blur) filter….
So, has Ricoh provided photographers with one of the holy grails of photography, a Digital CL equivalent camera, capable of using M mount lenses in a compact package? Read on to find out ;)
Under Red Lights – GXR at night – Oktoberfest –
CLICK IMAGES IN THIE REVIEW FOR LARGER AND BETTER VERSIONS!
St. Pauli Girls
A Word on the Anti-Aliasing Filter
To me, that last statement was BIG news….huge news, really. Finally, a company other than Leica was taking the step of removing the anti-aliasing filter from its sensor, thus, in theory allowing mounted lenses to achieve their maximal resolution on a 1.5 crop sensor. Other than the Leica M8, with its 1.3x sensor, the Leica M9 with its full frame sensor, and medium format cameras that are out of reach for most of us, no camera manufacturer had taken the bold step to exclude this anti-aliasing filter from their camera’s sensor. The argument behind anti-aliasing filters, for those of you who don’t know, is that they limit moiré patterns, which cause odd banding effects in images where repetitive patterns are captured. Moiré results when a lens out-resolves its sensor and creates aberrations, and the phenomenon is unique to digital photography (to the best of my knowledge), and so several years ago, the big 2 (Canon & Nikon) decided to incorporate anti-aliasing (AA) filters to eliminate the risk of moiré effects in images coming from their cameras. Unfortunately, using AA filters comes at a cost: loss of resolution, specifically at the pixel-peeping/micro-contrast level….Have you ever zoomed in on an image taken with your Nikon/Canon/Sony/etc dSLR and observed that images have that “Waxy” look to them? Therein is the unintended side effect of AA filters… Have you noticed that your M8 and M9 files do not seem to have this waxy look? What you are seeing is Leica’s decision to exclude the AA filters from their CCD sensors…
Some have argued that incorporating AA filters causes a blur effect and effectively cancels out some of the unique properties of the lenses to which the sensor is coupled? I know many photographers out there who swear that Leica’s decision to exclude AA filters has allowed Leica shooters to preserve the various looks coming from their M mount lenses….speaking of which, have some of you noticed that when your M lenses is adapted and mounted on your NEX or M4/3 cameras, some of their magic seems to be missing? Hmmmm, maybe the AA filter is at play here (certainly, the crop factor plays a role here, too, but…..)
The GXR can do sports!
35 mm Summilux FLE
135 mm APO-Telyt
Now onto the GXR-M Mount review
Okay, that was a big digression. The point of my ramble is essentially many photographers have been calling for Canon, Nikon or another manufacturer to produce a large sensor camera absent the ubiquitous AA filter….and along comes Ricoh, with their GXR M-mount module to save the day.
Before I get into the nitty gritty of my review, here are some features that highlight the A12 M-mount & my thoughts:
· APS-C sized (1.5 x crop) CMOS sensor, 23.5 mm x 15.7 mm (as compared to 36×24 mm for full frame)
· No Anti-Aliasing (AA) blur filter
· Micro-lenses optimized to provide sufficient brightness to the image periphery. This matters for wide angle lenses, where light “fall-off” can become an issue
· M mount native: This means you can natively mount nearly any M mount lens on the Module. Ricoh even includes an M-lens tester to use with your M lenses to insure that mounting your favorite M lens will not damage the sensor
· Color correction and vignetting features are available to allow fine tuning of your lens to the M-mount module
· Focus assist!: 2 versions of this, one where the entirely of the image is in grey scales, and objects in-focus gain enhanced contrast; the other version of focus-assist presents a color images, in which in-focus elements “shimmer” with white boarders (to enhance edge contrast) and allow focusing. I find this “focus peaking” option to be highly effective in focusing with M lenses. It also seems to eliminate worry about focus shift that many of us have experienced on our Leica M cameras and SLR’s.
· Image magnification: A selected portion of the image is magnified to provide better precision focus. To be honest, I don’t use this feature, as I find the focus-assist capacity to be adequate for using lenses, even wide open.
· Focal plane shutter: The focal plane shutter is a fairly quiet shutter option that can vary shutter speed between 1/4000 sec and 180 sec and is the primary shutter mechanism for the GXR A12 M-mount module
· Electronic shutter: This shutter is helpful with absolute silence is required for your photography. Selectable as a “scene mode” option, enabling this scene allows the GXR user to take an image with no shutter release noise whatsoever….I haven’t used this feature much, as it only allows the production of JPEG images as a scene mode. However, the electronic shutter is capable of shutter speeds of 1/8000 to 1 second, so there’s some creative potential and circumstances in which this could be helpful.
· Beyond this, the remaining features are those that come natively with the GXR, including a variety of scene modes. Particular favorites are the Grainy Black and White mode, toy camera mode, soft focus mode, “miniaturize” diorama mode, electronic level to insure proper framing, and a variety of other options.
1. All of this in a svelte package
Preserving the Bokeh – Zeiss C-Sonnar 50 mm
My set up:
Recently, I purchased the GXR body, along with an A12 28 mm equivalent lens, and then snagged the M mount module and VF-2 tiltable external viewfinder with it…. Of note, I find the VF-2, which provides a high definition 920K pixel LCD, extraordinarily useful. By tilting the viewfinder to 90 degrees, one can use the GXR similar to a Rollei, while you look down upon the viewfinder to frame and snap the image…a very useful tool when shooting discretely. Further, the VF-2 is high-res enough to use focus assist with manual lenses effectively, and is a godsend in brightly lit mid-day shooting, when the LCD becomes impossible to use. I ordered my GXR module from Popflash.com, which along with B&H and a few others, serve as authorized Ricoh dealers.
The remainder of the review will focus on using the GXR with mounted VF-2 view finder and A12 M mount module. To go along with module, I have been gradually testing the set up with several lenses:
· Zeiss C-Sonnar-T 50 mm f1/5 ZM lens
· Voigtlander 35 mm f/2.5 Color-Skopar lens with M mount adapter
· Leica 35 mm f/1.4 Summilux Asph FLE
· Leica 75 mm f/2 APO-Summicron
· Leica 135 mm f/3.4 APO-Telyt
I have any lenses yet to test on the GXR, but to date, it’s been fun to use the above set up to learn the system….
Cookin’ in the Low Light
The GXR M-mount in practice.
Let me boil it down to this: THE GXR and M Mount Module combo is a pure JOY to use in practice. Okay, now that this statement is out of the way, let me explain more.
I entered the M mount test period with a combined sense of joy and apprehension. The lack of AA filter, the native M mount, and compact form factor of the combo were appealing features. However, the capacity of this system to allow accurate focus and use of the M lens system was yet to be seen.
Let me reassure you that the focus assist feature, which you must enable in the menus, allows for great critical focusing of M mount lenses. I personally have used the color focus assist, which creates a shimmer to parts of the image, particularly hard edges, that are in focus as one adjusts their focal plane by rotating the focusing throw on their mounted lens….this feature is truly lovely, and allows for the effective use of M lenses on the GXR-M mount….however, the system is quite different than the rangefinder focusing mechanism, in which you use parallax to line up 2 images at the point of focus. In fact, I’d describe the GXR’s focus-assist function as a close cousin of the focusing mechanisms employed by manual focus SLR’s, specifically the split prism focusing screens seen in most older manual SLR’s such as the Leica M8, Pentax MX, and Nikon F series cameras….the focusing works much the same, requiring the photopher’s own eye to identify points of focus by identifying areas of maximum contrast. It’s a neat way to focus, and in my experience, a FAST way to focus. In fact, I’d say that I can focus my M mount lenses just as fast on the GXR as I would on my Leica M9….and that’s friggin’ awesome….
Next, how about the sensor? Is it any good? Does the lack of an AA filter allow the magic of M mount lenses to shine throw. In a sense, yes it does. I’ll go out on a limb and say with certainty that the GXR’s M mount sensor is very capable of resolving very impressive detail, consistent with its exclusion of the AA filter. There is NO waxy look to the images….when I came home and downloaded the first set of images from my GXR and blew up the images on my NEC 27 inch screen, I burst out into a BIG grin! Yup, the detail, the resolution, is there….BIG TIME….Let it be said here (IMHO) that the GXR M-mount’s 12 MP sensor kicks the pants off M4/3 and NEX cameras to date (I can’t comment on the NEX 5N or forthcoming NEX-7, however)…. I am getting resolution of images on par with my old Leica M8…the sensor is that good in terms of resolving capacity. Dynamic range of the sensor is up to the task, but I would call it “last generation” in terms of my subjective experience. Whereas newer cameras such as the Nikon D7000 and Pentax K5 really demonstrate remarkable dynamic range, the GXR M-mount module, similar to the M9, does not excel in this area. This is not to pan the camera by any means. Dynamic range is really up to the task for nearly all shooting circumstances, save very harshly lit circumstances where highlights are blown out or shadow details are needed.
Is it sharp enough? Does focus assist gain critical focusing? You be the guest…
C-50 mm Sonnar wide open
Finally, colors. I find the GXR to portray colors quite accurately and vibrantly. The colors coming from the camera seem ever so slightly more punchy than those coming from the M9, but the differences are subtle…subtle enough to make me marvel at what Ricoh has accomplished for a camera costing 1/7 the price of the Leica M9!
So far, all roses, right? Well, there are a few caveats, so let’s address those….The sensor, while capable of wonderful resolution, seems to do so at the price of a bit of noise. Even at base ISO and ISO “low” , I can see fine noise, which is most noticeable in shadows. Noise seems less evident in highlighted/bright areas. Does this have a negative impact on images coming from the GXR? The quick answer is no. However, if one is working with large prints or doing a lot of cropping, the noise factor can become an issue. What’s interesting to me is how noise evolves as ISO is pushed up. I have had the chance to work quite a bit with the camera in low light circumstances, and what I have found is that while sensor noise does increase with ISO, the features of this noise are not objectionable. In other words, at ISO’s as high as 2000, the GXR M mount module can perform quite well if the scene is properly exposed…Pushing and pulling files taken at high ISO’s hasn’t caused noticeable banding effects. In many ways, I find the GXR to be a better low light option for M lenses than certainly the M8, and possibly even the M9…However, at base ISO’s, the M8 and M9 files have a cleaner look to them when pixel peeping….so the GXR’s sensor is a bit of a Jekyll/Hyde story…in real world shooting, this doesn’t matter much, and given the high resolution of the sensor, and the relative cost of the camera/M mount combo (approx. $1000 USD as of this writing) the GXR performs admirably. Keep in mind that Ricoh does include some advanced noise-reduction algorithms that are customizable even for RAW files, but I choose to turn these features off and save noise reduction for my post-processing flow, so I can’t really comment on enabling noise reduction in-camera.
Cell Phone lady: 35 Summilux FLE
One other issue that crops up is the 1.5x crop of the GXR’s sensor. In effect, one has to factor the crop in when using the M-lenses. For example, in order to achieve a 50 mm effective focal length on the GXR, one would have to use a 35 mm lens. Similarly, a 50 mm lens becomes a 75 mm lens, and a 135 mm lens becomes an effective 200 mm lens….the 1.5x crop essentially causes the periphery of the image capable of being captured by M lenses to be lost, and as a result, some of the charms and eccentricities (for example, curvature of field) in rendering that one might see from an M lens is slightly diminished on the GXR M mount. Further, the 1.5 crop sensor is smaller that full frame, and depth of field is consequently reduced. Thus, when shot wide open on the GXR M mount, a lens will have greater depth of field (i.e. less control over shallow depth of field, by approximately 1 stop in most cases) than the same lens mounted onto a full frame sensor system. The lens will still collect the same amount of light and project that on the sensor, but depth of field effects will be less dramatic, particularly wide open…this effect is more extreme on m4/3 cameras, since these cameras have even smaller sensors that the GXR’s M-mount module.
Another pet peeve that I have with the camera relates to shooting speed. While shutter lag is minimal (that is, the speed from shutter click to image taken0, the time that the camera needs before it’s ready to take the next shot is upwards of 1 second. This lag is quite annoying in one-shot mode. Ricoh provides a “continuous” shooting mode within its menu structure, that allows for 3 FPS shooting, but it’d be really nice for Ricoh to work on a work around or buffer to allow more rapid shooting in 1-shot mode….
Other than that, I gotta say, this camera-sensor combo rocks. The GXR – M-mount module is capable of very high image quality and will be satisfying for many photographers. Using the VF-2 viewfinder allows for discreet shooting as well as photography in harsh daylight, when the external LCD becomes hard to view. IQ, as stated, is exemplary save the bit of noise that seems present across the range of ISO settings. The Lack of an AA filter was HUGE for photographers like me, who enjoy the sharpness and crispness of our digital M files’ micro crontrast….
Ice cream scoop in low light
Is the GXR-M-Mount Combo the Digital CL of my dreams?
So, to answer the question that I started with: Is this the Digital CL?
The answer, unfortunately, is no. In my eyes, a digital CL would incorporate a rangefinder or RF-styled focusing mechanism, and the GXR’s focus assist, while quite capable, is quite different than the focusing experience that one would experience on a Leica M camera. Many of you may be considering the GXR (or a Sony NEX camera) as a backup to your Leica M. I would try out these alternative cameras first before deciding to use the GXR-M mount or any other camera with focus assist/peaking as a back up? Why, you may ask? The reason is that the rangefinder focusing method is so different than the focus assist/peaking method that transitioning from one style to the other may be disconcerting for some photographers. Is this an issue for me? Absolutely not! I find that the focus assist feature is a joy to use, fast in practice, and capable of achieving excellent results with M lenses, even when shot wide open. In fact, I’d argue that in activities involving fast moving objects or people (i.e. sports), the GXR’s focus assist feature can be more accurate than the M rangefinder mechanism….Definitely some food for thought….
Okay, let me summarize some pros and cons of the GXR-M-mount system
· No Anti-Aliasing filter allows for HIGH resolution 12 MP files, comparable to output coming from the Leica M8!
· Focus assist rocks. You can focus fast
· High ISO performance is quite good for a cropped sensor camera
· Compact form factor and tiltable higher resolution VF-2 accessory allow for discrete shooting
· Colors are accurately represented.
· Dynamic range of images is adequate but not exemplary, especially when compared to other 1.5 x crop sensors
· Shutter lag is fine, but could be improved a tad
· No in-module image stabilization…not a big deal, but would be nice to have had
· VF-2 is 920K pixels. A higher resolution VF comparable to the NEX-7’s 2.4 million pixel EVF would be preferable. Maybe Ricoh will release an updated VF-3…common Ricoh!!!
· Noise creeps into the shadows even at base ISO
· The cameras buffer in 1-shot mode leaves something to be desired….
· 1.5 x sensor…Full frame or 1.3 crop would have been nicer, particularly to make full use of Leica’s wonderful wide angle lens arsenal.
· No Rangefinder focusing mechanism, so hence, no title as the new Digital CL-equivalent
The Ricoh GXR M mount module is truly wonderful! Is it revolutionary? Nope. Is it a capable photographic tool? Absolutely yes! Is it capable of getting the most out of your M lens collection? Nearly….limiting factors are low ISO noise and the 1.5x crop and their relative impact on image quality.
Am I sold? Yup, for sure. Ricoh’s decision to leave out the AA filter on its M-mount module was the right one for me and many photographers like me, where moiré is not a concern. Does Ricoh have some stiff competition coming? Oh yes. The Sony NEX7 will surely outsell it and be adapted to use M lenses, as the appeal of a NEX camera and the Sony brand will surely carry some serious weight. However, the NEX cameras sensors and mount are not tailored to M lenses with the care that Ricoh has clearly put into their M module? Why, Ricoh knows there’s is a market out there for people like us, who enjoy using manual focus lenses and heritage lenses? Most photographers out there could care less, and the NEX cameras and their M4/3 cousins will perform admirable for that crowd. I’d argue that the Ricoh GXR M mount module will ultimately be a better option for those who intend to use M lenses on a non-RF body, as Ricoh has taken care to tailor its camera/sensor to M lenses….They should be applauded for their effort. I, for one, am sold, and have been heavily using the M mount module. It will serve as my M9 back up until a time if and when Leica decides to provide us with its own Digital CL solution (emphasis on IF)….
Bottom line: 2 enthusiastic thumbs-up for the Ricoh GXR A12 M-mount module combination! Buy with confidence, my friends!
From Steve: I also just received the GXR M mount module and have just started to use it. I will post my thoughts after I spend some time with it but so far I pretty much agree with what Ashwin is saying! You can order the GXR M Mount Module HERE.
HELP ME TO KEEP THIS SITE GOING AND GROWING!! IT’S EASY TO HELP OUT & I CAN USE ALL THE HELP I CAN GET!
PLEASE Remember, anytime you follow my links here and buy from B&H or AMAZON, this helps to keep my site going. If it was not for these links, there would be no way to fund this site (and the cost these days to keep it going is pretty damn high), so I thank you in advance if you visit these links. I thank you more if you make a purchase! I have nifty search bars at the upper right of each page so you easily search for something at either store! I currently spend 10-14 hours a day working on this site and the only way that I can pay for it is with your help, so thank you! Currently my traffic has been increasing but my funds to pay for the site has been decreasing, so any help would be GREATLY appreciated!
Even if you buy baby food, napkins or toothpicks at Amazon it helps this site, and you do not pay anything extra by using the links here. Again, you pay nothing extra by using my links, it is just a way to help support this site, so again, I thank you in advance More info is here on how you can help!
If you enjoyed this article/review, feel free to leave a comment at the bottom of this page and also be sure to join me on twitter or my new facebook fan page! Also, you can subscribe to my feed at my subscribe page HERE and read these posts in your browser or news reader!
Fast and Prime Leica M9 Case/Holsster 1st Look Video!
Received the case I was talking about earlier today via Fed Ex from fastandprime.com and had a chance to give it a quick try and decided to make a quick video showing you guys what it looks like and how it works. Mine is the all black version which is fitting for an all black M9P :)
This is a hand made case from fastandprime.com, a brand new company that started up to provide these cases and accessories. There are thousands of M9 owners who read this site so I thought this would be interesting for those of you who enjoy cases and a way to carry your camera. This design is pretty unique as you can wear it around your waist or your body. It is a holster style that also locks in your M9, much like a gun holster actually.
When you want to shoot you simply pull out the camera and return it to its protective case when done. I could see this being great on all day street shooting outings. The case is quite firm and stiff out of the box but it would soften up with use. The case ships with a 5 year warranty card and a serial number stamped on the back of the case.
The only negative I found with it so far is it can be tricky to slide the M9 OUT of the case but this could be because I do not yet have the wrist strap (should be here tomorrow). Usually the wrist strap would be on and you could just pull it out in that way. This case is different than the Luigi cases which are made to stay on the camera at all time. This case is more for when you are out shooting with the camera and is a way to protect it in style, plus like I said, it is very functional.
You can also buy a lens case that slides on to the adjustable strap to hold an extra lens. Overall this is a very nice and premium product but it is not cheap! You can check out the options over at fastandprime.com and to see pricing options and color options click on “Catalog”. This will not be for everyone as many M9 shooters go naked but there are also many who love protecting their cameras when out shooting. Fast and Prime made a very unique case solution here IMO for those with the Leica deep wallets :) It is a beautiful product.
Hello to all! It’s Tuesday at about 7:22 am and I am awaiting a couple of packages today from UPS. It seems that at least once a week something gets delivered to my door and it is always a fun time seeing what is inside. Today I know what is coming and I expect it to be very very cool. One of the packages will contain the new Pentax Q camera and lenses, viewfinder, etc. I will be doing a complete review on the tiny Q system which has intrigues me since it was announced. This small sensor camera system has a couple of things going for it for sure, and that is small size and great build.
B&H has the cameras in stock now in white and black. I will be reviewing it with the 47mm equivalent kit lens, the fisheye and the 100mm equivalent Toy Lens. I do feel that the price seems high at $799 for having such a small sensor. This is only $100 less than an Olympus E-P3 setup and $100 more than a Sony NEX-5n kit. I will post a first look in the next couple of days but will be heading to Chicago on Thursday so I will be sure to carry the Q with me everywhere.
The Classified Buy Sell ads
Also, the classified section on the site is ROCKING! LOTS of great buys have been posted lately and I saw yesterday that a brand new unused Leica M9P in black was posted. If anyone wants a new one, check out the ad HERE. You can see all of the ads HERE, and even place your own! Sell your gear quickly and easily!
FAST & PRIME – A brand new premium hand made case/carry solution for your Leica M
So you think your Luigi case is nice? Wait until you get a load of this BRAND NEW system for carrying your Leica M9 from fastandprime.com. Part holster, part bag, part case. All three in one. This new system is all hand made from the best leather and each piece is even induvidually numbered. I was lucky enough to snag #1 and will be showing it off in a world premiere exclusive review/unveiling right here on the site. I have been in contact with the owner for quite a while now as he crafted my case and he has just launched the site HERE. I will be showing you my fast & prime M9 case via video and photos in the next two days and will be using it at the Chicago meet up/workshop.
From the looks of it, this is a GREAT design full of functionality and each system comes with the case/holster, neck strap, hand strap and lens case. Basically, no need for a bag when you want to go out with your M9 and two lenses. It will all fit around you or your waist with easy holster access to your M9. Now all I am going by his his description and photos but mine arrives today so I will let you guys know all about it ASAP. One thing is for sure, this is one functional design unlike any other out there today. Stay tuned!
What else is on the way? Olympus 45 1.8, Olympus Mini Pen (possibly), Ricoh GXR M unit and GRD IV…
I have other reviews in the works after I return from Chicago and am still waiting for my copy of the Olympus 45 1.8 which was supposed to be in my hands two weeks ago! It should arrive in the next week or so and I will be reviewing that on the E-P3 or Olympus E-PM1, the TEENY TINY MINI Pen which after holding one appears to be the smallest interchangeable lens camera to date. I’m not a huge fan of teeny tiny and feel the gorgeous E-P3 is a perfect size but many are loving it so I may do a review on it for those interested.
I have just returned from my travels around Scotland and after a rewarding spell shooting the Edinburgh Fringe Festival I thought I would share a few thoughts on easy street photography. That is street photography for the bashful or for beginners.
I’ve seen helpful tips mentioned quite a few times in different articles here on Steve’s site; hints on how to build up your confidence in shooting the street so I apologise if I am stepping on anyone’s toes. I have also seen lots of people with legitimate concerns about shooting the street in their home towns as they may not be quite as accommodating and nonchalant as bigger or more affluent cities. So I thought I would gather a couple of my humble thoughts together to help anyone out there who is tentatively dipping their toes into the Street Photography pond. These thoughts are hardly revolutionary and are probably old news to a lot of experienced photographers (I do not want to teach Granny how to suck eggs), but for the people who are just starting out, it may just be that little push they need to send them over edge and delve into this wonderful genre.
It is unquestionably a daunting genre to try and get in to, but it is most definitely a worthwhile and fruitful one. I also surmised that as many of the readers of this site probably shoot with Leica or Micro 4/3rds etc., inevitably I believe if they have not already, they will at some point get the urge to try their hand at street shooting and utilise these wonderful little tools in this field in which they excel.
So here is my first thought that pretty much encompasses the theory of easy street photography: shoot a local festival or carnival or any other event in which people are out on the street and having a good time. Easy! Suddenly your local community (which from day to day may not be the most friendly place to walk around and get in strangers faces, especially with a Leica hanging around your neck) becomes a hot bed of joviality and opportunity. In some ways it is kind of a cheat, and sometimes like shooting fish in a barrel but it is amazing practice for building up confidence of taking photos of people.
These example shots were all taken at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. It is an organised event which runs through the whole of August. The city streets becomes swamped with thousands of performers, comedians, artists, musicians, dancers and pretty much anyone out there who literally want to put themselves on a pedestal.
The streets are packed, flowing with vibrant energy, music is blaring and there are tourists everywhere shooting snaps left right and centre. You are therefore an invisible face in the crowd and have licence to photograph anyone and everything to your heart’s content without ever been approached, questioned or frowned upon. For people without brazen confidence this scenario is an ideal training ground.
The advantage to shooting an event like this is twofold. Firstly the artists do not mind having their photo taken as they are there to perform, show off and get exposure and secondly the crowds of people are distracted and blind to all of the cameras around and would never suspect that you are taking of them and not the vibrant juggling jester next to them.
There are however challenges of shooting such a busy street environment. It can be hard to get unique or interesting results and you may find yourself simply ending up with straight forward touristy snaps. There is no right or wrong way to take street photos, but always experiment with interesting angles and compositions to transform what could be a throw away snap into a keeper.
Another challenge shooting on such crowded streets is being able to frame a subject without getting the backs of heads or people walking into your frame to spoil a composition or character you have spotted. Timing becomes essential and you need to constantly make and remake decisions on when to shoot, instantaneously on spotting a possible scene or wait a while, shutter half depressed, to see if a scene to develops. For example: although these next two images compositionally look similar in their results they were taken in two very different ways. The first one was a decisive reaction, I spotted the character and brought the camera up to my eye and shot without thinking. The second one took me a good three minutes to chase and trail this fascinating Highlander through the busy crowds and finally manage to capture this image through a gap that eventually opened up for me. Persistence can pay off but if you miss an opportunity its gone forever.
At a carnival or festival like this, the revellers can become part of the event and by dressing up or doing something to put themselves out there in front of a crowd, they will never mind a photographer getting up close to take a shot. For example: even a simple thing like sitting down for a portrait this guy has took himself out of the crowd and placed himself in front of it, so you have all the time in the world to compose, get as close as you want and take as many shots as you like. No one will raise an eyebrow.
Think outside the box and document not just the people at the event, but the event itself. How does a particular carnival or festival affect your town? What are the decorations, alterations or results of a specific occasion on the street that will not be there in a week? It may not be an amazingly spectacular scene, but it is ephemeral history that is begging to be immortalised by an observant eye.
So if you have stuck with me this far I would like to thank you for reading my probably incoherent ramblings. I will wrap this up with this final image which is my personal favourite. It is not particularly interestingly composed, attention grabbing or extraordinary but what it is, (and what you can achieve if you head out for the day with your camera with the sole objective of taking photos), is a decisive moment. An interaction for a fleeting instant between two people. A connection that took place by chance when the moving statue accidentally dropped her mask and a helpful but cheeky little girl teased for a second before handing it back. Priceless.
I would like to thank Steve for letting me share my thoughts on this great site, to an excellent community of photographers. As his site is all about inspiration, I hope I have inspired even just a couple of people to go out and try something different and most of all build up a little bit of confidence to try to photograph something may not otherwise have.
You can check out some of my other Leica X1 experimentation and photography here:
From Steve: Received this post and thought it was worth posting after the last post on cameras and equipment. Benedict used a cel phone to take this shot of his newborn baby. Gorgeous photo but sad story that I would hope is an isolated incident. Still, I congratulate Benedikt on the new baby and the beautiful photo!
I used many cameras ranging from fantastic analog SLRs (Nikon F3), over digital compact cameras (Casio EX200), to digital SLRs (Olympus E520). About two years ago I read about the Leica M9 for the first time and was catched immediately. During that time the camera was soooo out of my league that I could only dream about it while reading blogs such as yours or Overgaards. About nine months ago came my chance: my wife got pregnant! – I managed to convince her on how important it is to have good pictures of our child and that the only way to get really good pictures is to buy THE camera. I knew that I needed time to practice focusing, so within the next three months I saved all my money, robbed my savings account and finally bought the M9 with a beautiful 35mm Summicron ASPH. From then on, I used the camera daily to practice my skills and get used to the camera. And then came the day: our daughter got born. Full of excitement I grabbed the camera for the first few shots and …. it failed!!! The shutter clicked but didn’t open!! Holy crap! I spend thousands of dollars on a camera that fails in the only moment it just MUST NOT fail!! Endless minutes passed by but the thing just didn’t work anymore! NONE of my previous cameras – no matter how crappy they were – had ever failed me! Do you feel my pain? Luckily I had my phone with me. And here it is: the picture which I would like my Leica to have taken, but instead was shot with a Samsung Galaxy S 2.
You know I have been thinking and the more I think the more I realize that the old saying of “It’s the photographer, not the camera” is sort of BS. Well, kind of… Sure, someone who knows nothing about photography will not be able to create a work of art, but with the right camera and right lens that person could get much closer to producing a photo that will WOW those who look at it. Why do you think so many of us keep lusting after certain cameras and lenses?
Let me explain…
For years and years I have seen photographers say that it is not the gear that makes a good photo, its the person who is taking the photo that matters. I also always hear about famous photos from back in the day, and how cheap old film cameras were used to create those photos. Well, just think if those photographers back then had access to some the tools we have today?
Lets face it, Ansel Adams was a GREAT landscape photographer but he did so much darkroom work to his prints that the final outcome was nothing like what was on the negative. He had to do hours and hours of work in the darkroom AFTER he took the shot, basically using the technology he had back then to improve his photo. HIs compositions were spot on, sure…but if he were shooting today I would bet anything that he would be using some killer medium format digital back, others will disagree though.
Let’s say you are an experienced photographer and you own a decent camera… say, a Sony NEX-5. You want to go out and shoot a portrait photo. You go out and come back with something like this (click image for larger):
Now, the above photo is super cute thanks to the subject and it is also a nice quality image. But does it have any special qualities that would wow the normal Joe looking at your work? Not really, just a cute baby. Now let’s say we have the same guy shooting with something like a Leica M9, and they also go out to get a portrait of the same baby (click image for larger)…
Now, the same photographer used both the NEX and the M9 but the M9 is giving the more “wow” shot. Why is this? Well, it is the lens of course. The 50 Summilux ASPH to be exact. The Sony used the 18-55 kit zoom. But the Leica has the more WOW factor due to the shallow depth of field and great B&W rendering. It also has more emotion due to it’s lack of digital-itis (sony looks more digital to my eyes). Somehow this M9 combo seems to always create beautiful photographs. Slap that same lens on an M6 or M7 or MP and the same feel will shine through, even more so.
This 2nd shot shows right here that the equipment does indeed make a difference when shooting a photo and certain equipment can give you more WOW to your shots, though it does depend on the type of photo you are shooting and the look you are going after.
A photographer who has a point and shoot and wants to shoot an image like the ones above (portraits) would get much better results with the M9 and Lux or even a DSLR or Olympus E-P3. End of story. So, the gear does make a difference and it is not ALL the photographer though having a good eye will help you get great shots with whatever you are shooting with. Different gear does indeed bring on different looks, which is probably why so many of us keep chasing the latest and greatest.
So, the moral of the story is that owning a nice camera with a nice lens can help to take better photos not only because you will get better quality but also because something like an M9 or Fuji X100 can inspire you to do more with it. Sure, if you have experience and “the eye” then you know what to look for but these days almost anyone with enough cash to buy a decent camera can pump out decent photos, even EXCELLENT photos.
Now I am not saying that everyone needs to run out an buy an M9 as that would be ridiculous. You can get amazing photos with almost any of the cameras out today, even an iPhone but I just wanted to jot down my thoughts while I sit here at the Chicago Airport waiting for my delayed plane :)
I’m sure this article will get loads of conflicting comments but fact is fact! It is not always the photographer because depending on the type of shot you want, certain cameras and lenses do indeed make a difference. Then again, I took both photos and the argument has always been that a great camera will not make a bad photographer better. THAT is a fact as well :) Thanks for reading!
After the last crazy comparison the other day many Leica owners complained that I should not and could not compare a Leica JPEG to a NEX-5n JPEG. Some e-mailed me in anger when all I did was produce a fair JPEG comparison that showed how each camera would pump out a JPEG with the same lens and aperture. It was indeed fair but all of us Leica M9 owners KNOW that the JPEG engine is not the greatest (though it is not really that bad).
I was asked by at least 20 of you to post a Leica M9 processed RAW file next to a NEX-5n out of camera JPEG. While this is not a fair comparison at all to the NEX-5n you can see the richness of the M9 file here. Both are full size and the 5n is direct out of camera with no tweaks at all. The M9 RAW file had the exposure taken down a notch in the RAW conversion.
So click on each image for the full size file. As soon as I get RAW support for the 5N, I will do a RAW comparison between both to satisfy those who have been asking .
On another note, I am traveling home today back to Phoenix AZ and will have a few cool posts up this week so check back later today and all week for more!
The M9P and 50 – click image for full size file
The NEX-5n out of camera JPEG with the 50 – NEX was on the VIVID setting
Now just to be clear – the Leica file was shot at 2.8 (exif says f/2 but it’s never accurate with the M9) and the NEX was shot at f/4 so this is not only NOT fair for the fact that the M9 was a RAW file, but the NEX was stopped down a bit. SO this is a flawed comparison all the way! BUT!! You can get an idea of how gorgeous the M9 RAW files come out. At least I think so. If the NEX RAW conversions are as good as the M9…look out.
BTW, I stood in the same spot so you could see the effect that the crop sensor has on the 50mm focal length .Enjoy!
Crazy Comparison – Sony NEX-5n and Leica M9 Image Quality!
Ok everyone, here it is! You know I have been shooting the Sony NEX-5n with my Leica 50 Lux ASPH via an adapter but I also have been shooting with my M9P as well. You all know I LOVE MY LEICA M9P and I will be the first to say it right now, the Sony NEX-5n feels like a toy in comparison when held in the hand. There is nothing quite like the feel of the M9 and this “Crazy Comparison” will be based ONLY on image quality of the out of camera JPEGS. Why no RAW? Well, there is no real support for the NEX-5n RAW files yet and I only use Lightroom and Photoshop these days.
Also, all of us M9 users know that it’s weak link is its JPEG output and it shines with RAW, so this comparison is basically just to give an idea of what the output of both cameras are with JPEGS and to also show the difference between a full frame sensor and crop sensor. The M9 beats the NEX-5n in every way, make no mistake! The body, the build, the simplicity, the control, and the full frame sensor takes advantage of the glass and exploits its full qualities.
Keep in mind though, for all of the differences in build, size, and control the NEX-5n is 10X less expensive and the image output is not that far off at all from the M9. When there is full RAW support I expect the same thing really as the 5n’s JPEG output is VERY good so its RAW files will be even better.
So, can the 5n be called the poor mans Leica M9? In my opinion NO, because it is a totally different kind of camera. The M9 is a rangefinder and you shoot with it in a totally different style. So the NEX-5n will never give you the RF experience. The NEX-7 will bring y ou a step closer with a slightly larger body, more dials for manual controls, built in EVF, etc and in fact, The NEX-7 will be a game changer, mark my words! I feel something like a NEX-7 with Leica glass with not only be a joy to shoot, but also give better quality than an M8 with the same lenses. But, the 7 will also be a different experience than shooting an RF and if you are an RF person, and love to shoot an RF neither of the new Sonys will cut it.
Me, I see the 5n or even better the NEX-7 as a GREAT backup to the M8 or M9 and for those who do not want the “RF” experience, the 5n and the upcoming 7 will be fantastic options for those looking for a high quality body for their Leica glass. The Ricoh GXR is also coming but I feel the 7 will give a better user experience and even output though the GXR may pump out super sharp files due to lack of AA filter. I’m liking what I am seeing so far from the NEX and still am looking forward to the 7.
The quality in the 5n is there, and shooting with the EVF is quick and easy. See the full size comparison shots below:
1st up: The M9P and 50 Summilux ASPH at 1.4 – Out of camera JPEG, AWB. Click image for full size file.
2nd: The NEX-5n and 50 Summilux ASPH at 1.4 – out of camera JPEG – AWB – Click image for full size
The shot below is from the M9P, again with the 50 Summilux ASPH.
and the 5n and Summilux
and one for fun with different lenses – Leica M9P and 50 SUMMITAR at f/2
and the NEX-5n with the 50 Lux at 1.4
Once again, the M9P is first – straight JPEG from camera – 50 1.4 at 1.4
I’m traveling again! Some shots from the road with the M9 and NEX-5n!
Earlier in the week on Tuesday I left Phoenix, AZ for Chicago and met up with Bradley Graupner who is helping me set up the Chicago workshop on Sep 24th. I was able to meet with him and tour the space as well as check out where we will all be having morning coffee at Intelligentsia, and it was fantastic! If you want to get in on the Chicago workshop there is still 1-2 spaces left. Bradley also routed out a cool photo walk that takes us through some cool spots for not only street photography but scenic stuff as well. The day will be jam packed, guaranteed.
On Wednesday I left downtown Chicago and headed to visit my sister and my nephew who lived about 45 minutes away. It was hectic as always at her house but it was nice to visit. I shot a few frames of my nephew and his freinds with the NEX-5n and kit zoom.
Next three shots, My nephew Jack and friends with the 5n and 18-55
once again, the 18-55 kit zoom in action on the 5n. This baby was so cute and only smiled when I pointed the camera at her. When I moved it away she cried!
As most of you know, I am not a fan of zoom lenses but the 18-55 is about as good as any other kit zoom, if not better. It’s slow, and I wish it was smaller but it kicks the coating off of the 16mm, which I find VERY lackluster with the NEX-5n. The 16mm just does not produce nice looking images IMO with this camera, unless the copy I have is shoddy. They seem flat, lack color punch and have below average contrast. So the 18-55 I like. Maybe this is why Sony stopped offering the 16mm as a pack in lens with the 5n and upcoming 7. Hmmmm.
So after my sisters house I headed for Southern Illinois where my Mom lives. We had planned a trip into Kentucky to visit some family and take some photos up in the mountains so I charged up my batteries and took along the M9P and 50 Summilux as well as the NEX-5n and 16, 18-55 and Leica M Adapter.
I simply love using the Leica glass on the 5N and using the EVF. The focus peaking rocks (as I already stated in my NEX-5n review) and I am seeing quality just as good as I am getting out of the M9, but with a crop of course. Rich color, great sharpness, and super DR. The NEX and 50 Summilux ASPH is a great combo but so is the old $350 Summitar!
Below are a mix of images, some shot with the M9P and some with the 5n. I may post some side by side M9/5n shots tomorrow evening so check back for more! I have to get to bed now as it is getting late and I am getting an early start tomorrow for more driving and photography! Oh and If you have e-mailed me in the last 2-3 days and I have not responded, I will respond in the next 24 hours!
The next two are of my Mom with the 16mm/5n as we made a stop during our 7 hour drive to take a break…
One of the roads as we entered the mountains…16mm 5/n
I slapped the 1942 Leica 50 Summitar on the NEX-5n for this shot which seems a little oversharp (my fault)
and the M9P comes out for a shot…
The weather was grey, dreary and overcast. No sun, so magic light and it was also pretty chilly compared to Phoenix! The next few shots were all with the M9P and 50 Lux ASPH. All from RAW.
What is also funny is as we were driving we saw all of these interesting signs :) (most NEX-5n and 16)
and a few more random snapshots with the 5N. The cat shot was with the 50 Lux at 1.4 – JPEG
With the 18-55
…and one more with the 16mm which I edited with contrast and color boost.
Hello everyone! I am in Chicago right now doing some organizing for the upcoming workshop on the 24th (which still has TWO spots available) and I took visit to Central Camera where I found a used but mint condition Leica Digilux 1 with case and charger for only $129! I knew of this camera and have held one before but never owned one. Decided to but it just for nostalgic reasons. It is the camera that preceded the Digilux 2 which has reached cult status in the Leica community.
So look for a fun classic review soon on this Leica classic. I’ll have more posts this week including a Sony NEX-5n side by side comparison for image quality against the Leica M9, both using Leica glass. Should be fun as I will be doing these tests up in the mountains of Kentucky! Stay tuned!
NOTE – EVERY image in this review was shot as a JPEG. At the time of this writing Adobe Photoshop/Lightroom does not support NEX-5n files. So every picture here was shot as a JPEG and all of the images here were shot with the 18-55 kit zoom, a few with the 16mm and some with a Leica lens via adapter. All Auto White Balance. Also, this is a long 7000 word real world review as I had quite a bit to say about the 5n. Enjoy and leave a comment below if you like!
Below: Video Overview
Ok, so the headline picture above is a break from the norm for my main title graphic but it DID grab your attention did it not? Haha. In fact that shot is a self portrait of yours truly taken with the NEX-5N and Leica 50 Summilux ASPH at 1.4. I was testing out my new $10 Halloween mask and was having some fun with the camera late one night. When I looked at the image and then looked at the specs of the NEX-5N it all made sense. There I was, looking like a monster and I shot this image with a camera that has so many features that it is an actual MONSTER of a tiny camera! A monster in the bang for the buck camera world. Yep, the Sony NEX-5N, after using it for a week or so has impressed me quite a bit with its abilities. This came at a time when I was almost ready to write off the whole NEX series after getting unsatisfactory color from my Old NEX-5 (after comparing with the Olympus E-P3).One thing is for sure, these are Exciting times for us camera gear head nuts.
Now, without further ado, here is my MONSTER of a real world review!
Being a guy who loves photography AND the gear associated with it is a dangerous thing. A guy in my position gets to try out just about any camera gear I want. While I do not try everything (I AM only ONE guy and this site has a staff of ONE…ME) I do try what catches my eye. I am always aware of the new technology and new cameras. When I see one that gives me goosebumps I add it to my “MUST review list”. I admit, the 5n did not really give me goosebumps when it was announced but I was intrigued by Sony’s claims so I gave it a shot.
The NEX-5N and 18-55 Kit Zoom – out of camera JPEG – Vivid – ISO 2000 – Yes, 2000. Click for larger version.
THE NEX SERIES TAKES THE NEX STEP TO GREATNESS
When the original Sony NEX-3 and NEX-5 were released there was a ton of hype not only from Sony, but from users as well. Sony had a ton of press on these cameras all because of the super slim design and large sensor. Sony were the 1st to take the APS-C sensor and pack it into a very TINY body that was capable of great performance. They also broke new ground with High ISO performance and I remember the NEX-3 and 5 were pretty special in this area. I did buy a NEX-5 when it was released and owned one up until a few weeks ago. I enjoyed the camera for about a year but when the new Olympus E-P3 came out with its new lenses and super fast speed I went back to Olympus yet again. Even though the E-P3 has a smaller sensor than the Sony NEX-5 I loved it for its style, its design, its new found performance all the way around, and most of all, the new lenses.
Back to the NEX, but my heart belongs to the 7
So here we go, not long after the E-P3 is in my hands and paid for I see Sony announce the NEX-C3, 5N and 7. The NEX-7 was the camera that REALLY tugged at my soul. There it was. 24 Megapixels, a built in OLED EVF, pro build but still compact, more dials for easy control…super HD video quality and even a new Zeiss 24 1.8 lens announcement. THIS is the camera I have been longing for…and for YEARS (THE NEX-7). Yes, I have my Leica M9 and will always have my M9 but as a take anywhere snapshot camera the Olympus E-P3 which is so quick and easy to use has taken over as my daily shooter. Lift and fire..so quick! I finally decided to save my Leica M9P for special moments or when I actually do paying photo jobs.
Oh yea, where was I? The NEX-7…that camera seems to have it all so when the 5N was announced along side of it I had no real interest. Why would I? The 7 had everything I wanted while the 5N seemed the same as the old 5. Well, after getting a hold of the 5N I can say if this is any indication of what will come in the 7, “hold on to your britches”!
Sony has somehow taken the great performance of the NEX-5 and made it quite a bit better in many areas. The body style of the 5N is almost exactly the same as the old 5 with a few new snazzy cosmetic improvements like the dual colored on/off switch in silver and black and the shutter button seems to look and feel a little better as well. But as Sony said, the NEX-5N has improvements under the hood.
Check out two out of camera JPEGS at higher ISO below shot with the kit 18-55 Zoom. Yea, those are higher ISO images and you can click on them to see larger versions. Then I will get on to what is new with the NEX-5n.
What is new in the 5N? Let’s take a look:
The new 16.1 Megapixel Sensor – This sensor is all new and is shared in the new C3, but let me state RIGHT NOW…if you are in the market for a new NEX camera, do NOT buy the C3 unless you strongly prefer it’s grip. For $100 more you can get the 5N which trounces it in many areas. With that said, the new sensor in these cameras is pretty astonishing. It gives us plenty of resolution with a 4912X3264 image size. This is plenty of resolution for almost ANY need. I used to know a guy who shot billboards with a 4MP camera. 16.1 MP is enough for almost anyone, and the target market of this camera is everyone from 100% amateur to enthusiastic photo nut. What do these people take photos of? Their kids, flowers, their pets, themselves, vacations, landscapes… Yep, 16.1 Megapixels is plenty! What is really improved with this sensor though is the color rendition. Quite simply put, it is gorgeous. Look at the ISO 1250 shot above of the fruit bowl, which is an out of camera JPEG shot with the kit zoom. The high ISO capabilities of the 5n are ridiculous for this size of a camera. ISO 25,600 can be used in a pinch of you absolutely need the shot. 12,800 even better and 6400, no problem. This is an improvement over the past NEX-5, no question. This new sensor is a WINNING even more than Charlie Sheen.
The new touch screen LCD Panel – Sony added a touch screen to the NEX-5N but they did NOT add it to the C3. Will I use the touch screen? Probably not while shooting as it does not work as slickly as the E-P3 touch screen. With the sony you have to do a double tap to take a photo, with the Olympus you touch once and it focuses super fast and snaps the shot. I may use the touch screen while reviewing photos as it works like my trusty iPhone. More from Sony: Sony’s 3.0” Xtra Fine LCD™ monitor has 921K dots for superb resolution. The TruBlack™ screen includes a special resin layer to suppress internal reflections, increasing contrast compared to conventional LCDs. Sunny Weather mode boosts visibility even further in bright sunlight. Tilts down 45° and up 80° to frame high- and low-angle shots that would otherwise be hit-or-miss. Object Tracking AF can lock onto a specified object and maintain focus even as the subject moves. This hassle-free mode allows unpredictable subjects to stay in focus even while zooming. Letting you concentrate on the scene and composition without having to worry about focus. The subject on which to lock focus is easily selected via the touch screen or the center button of the control wheel.
Improved HD Movie mode – From Sonys Web Site: Record Full HD 1920×1080 video in a variety of frame rates from 60p for super smooth action to 24p for a more cinematic feel. The NEX-5N utilizes the AVCHD™ codec, the industry standard for high quality HD video capture, as well as the MP4 codec for easy upload to the web due to it’s smaller file size.
Worlds shortest shutter lag – In photography, shutter lag, or release time, is the delay between triggering the shutter by fully depressing the shutter button and when the photograph is actually recorded. By initiating the exposure electronically instead of with the traditional shutter mechanism, release time on the NEX-5N is reduced to just 20 milliseconds – helping you to capture the decisive moment.
10 Frames Per Second – Capture the decisive moment in sports and get the ideal baby photo. Up to 10 fps continuous shooting at full 16.1 MP resolution. Standard continuous shooting speeds vary based upon shooting conditions and memory card speeds.
Ability to use the new OLED EVF (The C3 does not allow this) – The optional FDA-EV1S OLED Tru-Finder? offers a large, bright and wide-view of the scene. With high resolution 2.395K dot, and unprecedented speed, contrast and color accuracy, the FDA-EV1S provides an extraordinary view.
New BIONZ Image Processing Power – The brain of the camera is a refined version of Sony’s BIONZ® image processor. Its chroma noise reduction delivers high-resolution, low-noise photos even at ISO 25600 sensitivity. Also enables fast processing for up to 10 fps continuous shooting of data-intensive 16.1 megapixel images, 2D/3D Sweep Panorama™ modes and 6 image layering.
Manual Focus Peaking (Also in old Nex-5 via firmware update) – The Peaking AF display makes precise manual focusing much easier by highlighting the edges that are in focus in your choice of three colors ( white, red, or yellow). This is especially helpful during macro or portrait photography where your focal plane can make or break your shot.
So with all of these new additions the #1 thing to rave about (in case I did not already mention this) here is the new sensor. Even when shooting with the 18-55 Kit zoom, the output is wonderful. When shooting with my Leica 50 Summilux ASPH via an adapter, the quality I am seeing is better than what I used to get with the standard NEX-5, and it is breathtaking if the light is right.
To be honest, after shooting with this camera for a while I almost wish sony would have used this sensor for the NEX-7! I am a little worried that the 7 with its 24 megapixels will be more noise filled at higher ISO, but we will see, maybe it will be even better. Let’s be real for a second…Super high ISO past 3200/6400 is over rated anyway and no one I know ever goes past 6400.
From what I am seeing in the 5N, it appears to be the new king of the “Bang for the Buck” digital cameras on the market. No it is not cheap at $699 but for what you get it IS really a deal. But the NEX-5N is NOT perfect. Read on to find out what I do not like about the NEX system.
Sony NEX-5n with 16mm – not bad huh?
Kit Zoom – ISO 500 – Out of camera JPEG
16mm – the colors are pretty close to what I saw
The NEX-5N is not perfect. What are the negatives with the NEX system?
So you thought this was going to be a 100% rave about the NEX-5N? Well, as a camera I have mostly great things to say about it. Then again, I ONLY review and write about cameras that I like as I hate negativity and I hate whining. Be assured if I write about a camera here with a full review then I have used it and really liked it. I liked it enough to write about it because if I hate a camera I am not inspired to write about it and why should I? Crap cameras should not get publicity :)
So seeing that the 5N’s positives greatly outweighed it’s problems I am now sitting here writing about it. The NEX system as a whole is still fairly new. Basically, it has only been about a year since the very 1st cameras were introduced and because of this the main problem with the NEX system is there are no really good lenses available! Well, there are lenses, but not many. You would think that Sony, a GIANT among GIANTS would be able to whip out 4-5 new lenses..like..right now. BUT they have been slow going. The 1st year all we had for native lenses was the 18-55 Kit Zoom, the 16mm Pancake Kit Lens, and the 18-200 super zoom. There were no fast primes and the 18-55 and 16mm were very soft on the NEX-3 and 5. That was the one drawback to many who wanted to step forward with a NEX purchase. The lenses.
How long has the Micro 4:3 format been out now? 2-3 years? They are JUST now starting to get some great lenses for that system so maybe it is just a matter of time for the NEX system. This year we will get the new 24 1.8 Zeiss prime which is AWESOME. We will also get the new 50 1.8 lens which will be affordable as well as useful. This is good news but still, as of this writing, these lenses are NOT available.
As of now all I have to use natively is the 16mm and the 18-55. The great news is that the NEX-5N seems to work better with these lenses than the previous “5”. Maybe it is just my eyes playing tricks on me but the performance of these kit lenses seems to have gotten a little bit of a boost with the new sensor. So much so that I am now a fan of the 18-55 and I never thought I would say that about this lens. The 16mm still leaves a bit to be desired in the contrast/color/sharpness area.
The other negative of the NEX-5n is still all about the control. It has the same control scheme as the old 5, no added buttons. The buttons are customizable though so this is a step in the right direction (with the 7 being the ultimate NEX design). It is also VERY small and the lenses are a bit LARGE. Cameras like the Olympus E-P3 have SMALL lenses with a smallish body. The NEX-5N is about TINY body, LARGE lenses! Kind of odd but it is what it is due to the larger sensor being used in the NEX system. Some will argue that the Leica M9 is a full frame and it uses small lenses. True, but the Leica lenses are MANUAL focus and aperture. They do not need AF motors or mechanisms inside the lenses, which in turn makes them bigger. Still, the NEX-5N and kit zoom or even the 24 1.8 is NOT as big or fat or bulky as a DSLR. Not even close.
Compared to the Olympus E-P3 the E-P3 feels more solid and better built and is also heavier. It also feels better and more comfortable in the hand than the NEX-5n and focuses quicker. The NEX-5n will hunt a bit in lower light when using Auto Focus. At least with the 18-55 kit lens it does. I am also getting more accurate focus with my E-P3 as it never seems to fail me. The NEX-5n did fail a few times when shooting in lower light scenarios, meaning the focus was off. But there are tradeoffs. The swivel LCD of the NEX and the better quality it is capable of may outweigh everything else for some.
There you go, those things are really about the only negative things I can say about this camera/system. The same things people have been saying for a year. What is interesting is the NEX-7 seems to have fixed almost all complaints. The body is a little larger, it has a built in EVF and control wheels up top and new lenses on the way. Mark my words.The 7 will be the superstar in the NEX line if the image quality is as good as it is in this NEX-5n, and on paper it appears it SHOULD surpass it. We shall see. I think the Zeiss 24 1.8 will be a GREAT pairing with the NEX-5N and 7.
Speaking of Image Quality
ISO 500 – NEX-5n and 18-55 – Click image for larger version
The image quality of the NEX-5 is absolutely killer and I have been using the cheap-o kit zoom lens and cheaper still 16mm! When I opened up my files I expected the somewhat dull, somewhat fuzzy results that I seemed to get from my old NEX-5 most of the time. Or even the sharper and more colorful results (but still a little “fuzzy”) that I got from the C3. WRONG! When I opened up the JPEG files from the NEX-5N I rubbed my eyes and said “WTF”?? Gorgeous color. Smooth detail. No fuzziness or softness anywhere. Sure I still saw the distortion from the 18-55 when at 18mm (until I enabled in camera distortion correction) but the image quality POPPED off of my screen. Sony has really improved the color and out of camera JPEGS with this camera.
Again, I will say that if you are thinking of a new NEX and are in this price range, do NOT even consider the NEX-C3! The 5N is now $100 more and you get so much more for that $100. I can NOT recommend the C3 but will highly recommend the 5N just due to its new sensor and performance. C3 with Kit lens is $549 – NEX-5n with kit zoom is $699
NEX-5n with the 16mm at 2.8
Another with the 16mm. Remember you can click image for larger view.
Keep in mind though that while the high ISO performance is the best yet in a NEX camera, when you get to lower light and past ISO 1250 you will start losing a bit of color fidelity and things will start getting a little more dull. Not really dull, but not as vibrant and nice as if you shot low ISO in good light. Also, the 5n seems to underexpose a little when using their evaluative metering. I found using center weighted helped. Speaking of low light…
Shooting the NEX 5n in Low Light – The true test of High ISO
I took the NEX-5n out with me one day to the local Aquarium because I knew it would be a challenge due to the very low light and funky lighting. As I stated at the top of this review ALL images in this review are out of camera JPEGS as at the time of this writing Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop do not convert NEX-5n files. So everything you see here is all JPEG. When Adobe updates Camera RAW I will update this review at the bottom with some RAW conversions.
So at the aquarium I also brought along my Olympus E-P3 and can say without a doubt that the Olympus focuses faster in good and low light. It’s instant but the Sony hunts a bit when the lights go down. Still, both are fairly quick though the Sony has to use the assist lamp to nail it and I was not using the assist light with the E-P3. I also got quite a bit more image noise with the E-P3 files at LOWER ISO’s than I did with the NEX-5n files at higher ISO’s. The NEX-5n’s images were also “richer” and had a little more depth due to the larger sensor. With the new image processing in the 5n, the JPEGS are much nicer than those from the old 5. Sharper, more colorful and they seem to pop out at you.
ISO 1250, 18-55 kit zoom – click image for larger version
ISO 3200 in VERY low light. Low light is where you can see the real high ISO performance.
iso 3200 – click image for larger
I can say with confidence that the quality in REALLY low light and higher ISO was pretty darn good. I left the camera on Auto White Balance and Auto Focus. I shot with the 18-55 wide open as I could get it and I hoped for the best. No, these are not noise free with perfect tone and color but no camera will give you this at high ISO’s like 3200 IN super low light. For being handicapped with a slow zoom and not using any kind of flash, AND being in a dim and dark aquarium, this IS impressive.
Imagine if we had a time machine and went back to the days of the Nikon D2h and Canon D30 with a camera like the NEX-5n. ISO 25,600? CRAZY! We can get better quality today in a $700 camera set than we used to get from a $5000 camera body. Technology just keeps getting better and better. I wonder what digital will be like in 10 years from now? Hmmmm.
SUPER High ISO – Is it useable?
Yes, this camera goes up to ISO 25,600 (see the 1st shot below) but usually when you see this listed on a camera spec sheet you can laugh it off as a joke. The 5n at its maximum ISO, if taken in “decent” light, meaning, not bright but not dark, can yield pretty incredible results… and the shots still hold detail which is pretty freaking cool. Take a look below at my SUPER HIGH ISO SHOTS and crops. You must click each image to see the lull size out of camera versions.
My conclusion? I have yet to see any camera beat this for high ISO..well, maybe the 100lb Nikon D3s, but maybe not? Still, the sweet spot for the 5n is between 100-1250 ISO.
Low Light HIGH HD Video
I also shot some low light and high ISO HD video at 3200 and even 6400 ISO. The results are below and I am impressed! Remember, this video was shot with the SLOW 18-55 and HIGH iso!
Shooting the NEX-5n with Leica glass – Let the focus peaking begin!
As 98% of you already know, you can shoot the NEX-5n with Leica glass just like you did with the NEX-5. Just buy an adapter like THIS ONE and you are all set. Though if you want the BEST adapter I would buy THIS ONE. But why spend all of that cash when there are adapters available for 10X less? Well, I already have been through FOUR of the cheap M to NEX adapters and they all become loose over time and the lenses wobble. The higher priced model from Novoflex has not done that and it provides a very FIRM fit. Expensive but will last. I guess it is for those who like to buy one time and be done with it. There is a difference and after a year of use and four cheap adapters I decided it was time to bite the bullet for the Novoflex especially with my new found love for this system and manual glass with its EVF and focus peaking.
Old M mount glass, new M mount glass…they all work lovely on the NEX-5N and even better than they did on the old 5 it seems. The 5n comes loaded with the new Focus Peaking feature that allows us to easily shoot with our old manual lenses and get our shots IN FOCUS. I show an example of this in the video at the top of this page. When manually focusing using the rear LCD or the EVF you will see your in focus ares light up and that is when you know you are in focus. It’s quick and easy and works pretty damn good. The EVF worlds AMAZINGLY well with manual focusing using peaking. Spot on every time for me. I had the camera set to HIGH for peaking and used the RED color. In bright sun it is hard to see the rear LCD but the EVF saved the day and made it a breeze.
Below are a few shots taken with the 5n and the Leica 50 Summilux ASPH. In my opinion the results speak for themselves and the quality is gorgeous.
The next four shots were all with the NEX-5n and Leica 50 Summilux ASPH at 1.4
and the next two were shot with the 5n and 50 Summitar at f/2 in Dynamic B&W mode
The NEX-5n Picture Effects & other fun features
Inside the “Brightness/Color” menu you will see the choice to choose a Picture Effect, if and only if you are shooting JPEG only. This area will be greyed out if shooting in RAW format, even RAW + JPEG. This seems to be Sony’s attempt at creating Art Filters like Olympus does in their cameras. Inside the NEX menu you will find the following choices:
Toy Camera, Pop Color, Posterization, Retro Photo, Soft High Key, Partial Colors, High Contrast B&W, Soft Focus, HDR Painting, Rich B&W (like B&W HDR), Miniature
There is also the old standby options like Hand Held Twilight and Sweep Panorama which I spoke of in my NEX-5 review almost a year ago.
Sweep Panorama works great and is super easy to use.
The NEX-5n VS the others
I am already getting the question “Which camera should I buy”? Again, I can not answer that for you and all you can do is look at reviews on various sites and judge for yourself. I will give my thoughts on a few hot cameras right now and how they compare though.
NEX-5n vs Olympus E-P3 – The Olympus looks cooler, feels better built, and feels better in my hand. It’s more expensive and has a smaller sensor that puts out more noise than the NEX-5n. The 5n is capable of higher resolution, more depth, and shallower depth of field to the photos but lenses are lacking for the NEX system at the time of this writing.
If you do not mind a smaller sensor, not as good low light performance, and paying a little more, the Olympus E-P3 will give you faster auto focus, super clean low light video (not sure how they pull it off but they do) and access to some cool lenses like the Olympus 12mm f/2, 45 1.8, Panasonic 20 1.7 and 25 1.4. BUT the image quality will be better with the 5n in lower light and high ISO. Also, the 5n has a swivel LCD which I used quite a bit and appreciated. The E-P3 has to be held level so you can see what you are doing (unless you have the EVF). Also, the Sony NEX 5n with the new OLED EVF is fantastic. Almost a must IMO.
E-P3 – Better build and feel but more expensive. Easier to control, faster AF, in body image stabilization and good HD video though lots of “Jello Effect” if IS is on. Noisy high ISO, less shallow depth of field.
NEX 5n – Better low light capability and cleaner high ISO images, better battery life, 24P and 60P manual control HD video, larger sensor and higher resolution with great color and more deoth. Also more HD video options (No Jello Problem) and swivel LCD screen. No in body IS.
NEX-5n vs The Fuji X100 – The Fuji X100 is a fantastic camera as well and is only hindered by it’s slow and quirky operation. Slower AF, slow write times, slow feeling when compared to other similar cameras. BUT the Fuji has a great fast prime lens that delivers rich and nice colorful images. It is great to hold and feels super good in the hand, more like a traditional camera. The beauty of it is that it has a built in hybrid VF and there is no need to buy an external. The X100 can not change lenses though so you must be happy with a 35mm field of view. The NEX-5n is a totally different camera than the Fuji but beats it in the HD video department and speed department. Also, the Sony can change lenses and use a multitude of glass using adapters. In my opinion, the Fuji feels like a camera and the NEX more like an electronic gadget. Which you choose is all down to taste and preference.
Fuji X100 – Nice design, built in hybrid EVF/OVF, great fast prime 35mm equivalent lens, beautiful files and great low light performance. Also silent in operation.
NEX-5n – Faster in focusing and write times, even better high ISO capability, better battery life, better HD video, smaller body but bigger lenses and louder shutter.
NEX-5n vs Ricoh GXR System – The Ricoh GXR system is a great little camera system that uses “modules” with the lens and sensor all built into one “Cartridge” that slides on to the body of the GXR. I loved this system while I owned it but sold it off after acquiring the Fuji X100 and Olympus E-P3. Why? Because it had shutter speed limitations that I did not like. The Fuji has them too but its built in ND filter solves the issues. I still love the GXR and what it does because it is a fantastic everyday shooter that gives wonderful and rich quality. There are only two lenses for the GXR system worth owning IMO, the 28 and 50 APS-C A12 modules. Their new Leica M mount module is arriving any day now so that should be interesting though 1st samples I have seen have been underwhelming to me.
In real use, the NEX-5n beats the GXR in focus speed, high ISO, HD video but the GXR wins in usability and build and has better lenses. Also, the GXR LCD does not swivel though you can buy an external EVF for it. This one comes down to personal preference as the GXR is a camera you will either LOVE or HATE.
Ricoh GXR – Built very well, versatile with the superb 28 and 50mm f/2.5 modules, snap focus for street shooters works well, high ISO is good up to 3200.
NEX-5n – Swivel LCD, high ISO capability, awesome HD video but lack of lenses right now hurts the NEX system.
NEX-5n vs NEX C3 and older NEX-5 – NO CONTEST. If you are going to buy a new NEX camera right now and are not planning on buying the super NEX-7 at $1199, then go for the 5N. It is the biggest bang for the buck and it makes no sense to buy the C3 when the 5n is only $100 more. You gain metal build, better grip, touch screen, quieter shutter sound and possibly better high ISO and JPEG sharpness. Also, the 5n is a better buy than the old 5 unless you are getting a GREAT deal on the old 5. This one is easy, if buying new, go for the 5N, no contest.
NEX-5n vs NEX-7 – Hmmm. Well, no one has held or shot with a working NEX-7 as of this writing so this is tough but on paper, the camera to choose would be the 7 if you r budget allowed. It’s the superman of the NEX series and I can not wait to get my hands on it. I am excited most about the OLED built in EVF and two control wheels on top. I am also happy that it is a little larger than the 5n. Finally, I can compose on a NEX, even with old manual glass and use the built in EVF to frame and focus AND use my fingers to control the Aperture without looking out of the EVF. Also, I won’t have a huge wart sitting on top if I want to use the EVF. From a design standpoint, the NEX-7 is perfect. WIll it have as good of high ISO performance of the 5n. Unllikely, but who uses ISO 12,000 in real life anyway? Not me, I usually max out at 6400 no matter what, and even that is rare. Im sure the 7 will be fantastic at 3200. Me, I am buying the 7 for my personal use for the reasons I described. It even has a built in flash unlike the C3 and 5n.
BUT, if you do not have that kind of budget, or prefer the design of the 5n then the 5n is the best of the NEX series for you. Even if you do not need the NEX 7 features you could save some money and buy a 5n (or keep your old 3 or 5) and buy a new lens like the upcoming Zeiss 24 1.8 or Sony 50 1.8. This would be a great addition as glass is always more of an investment than a body. A NEX-5n and 18-55 and EVF will cost you $1049. The NEX-7 with no lens is $1199, with the kit zoom $1349. So $300 more for the NEX-7 body, design, features and higher res sensor. In reality, not bad IMO as it looks like a long term keeper.
NEX-5n vs Leica M9 – Ok, I had to do this comparison as I know I would have been asked. Leica M9P with 50 Lux vs NEX-5n with 50 Lux. Same light, same aperture. We all know these are different cameras but Sony, with the new Focus peaking and EVF is starting to really bridge that gap with the quality and user experience. This is where the new EVF shines and where the NEX-7 will really show its stuff.
Here is a full out of camera JPEG from the Sony NEX-5n with the Summilux 50 at 1.4 – Click image to see the full size
and now the same shot with the M9P and 50 Summilux, also at 1.4 – click to see the full size
The new Sony OLED EVF for the NEX-5n
I also have been able to use and try out the new EVF for the 5n and have to say that it is fantastic, but expensive at half the price of the 5n itself. Even with that being so, the view is huge, wide, and crisp. NO it does not look like an optical VF, it looks like an electronic VF but let’s face it, the EVF (Electronic View Finder) is the future of digital and I like seeing Sony push the quality up. This will be the same EVF that will be built in to the Sony NEX-7 and A-77 DSLR. Highly recommended for all NEX-5n shooters as this makes shooting the camera feel more natural and easier to compose for those of us who are more used to a viewfinder. Also, as I already hinted at, if you shoot with manual glass on your NEX I find this is a MUST own as the EVF combined with the Focus Peaking works SO well. I am sorry to say that this accessory is NOT compatible with the old NEX-5. Why? I have no idea but I think Sony should have supported the old 5 as well. Kind of crappy of them to do that.
This is the best EVF I have ever laid my hands on. Period. Not only in quality but also design and eye comfort. Below is a shot of the EVF on the black NEX-5n. Yea, it is a wart like all external EVF’s but it works and works well.
PROS and CONS of the Sony NEX-5n
Small size, improved sensor, super high ISO performance
Dynamic Range seems HIGH – dare I say better than a 5DII? Hmmm.
Longer battery life than the old 5
Faster AF than the previous 5 (but not by much)
Lovely color rendition when shot in good light, even good in lower light
Ability to shoot with third party lenses via adapter
Great quality HD 1080 Video with various options and manual control – no jello effect
New lenses finally on the way!
Price is right, great bang for the buck and beats the NEX-C3 easily.
Swivel LCD is great
OLED EVF is fantastic
10 frames per second shooting speed is crazy fast
Low light twilight mode works very well as it did with the previous 5
Sweep panorama still rocks!
Focus tracking works well
Shutter lag is virtually non existent at 20 milliseconds.
Focus Peaking and EVF are a perfect match for manual glass
Hunts to AF in low light, even with assist lamp which is pretty bright
Lack of lenses right now! (at the time of this writing)
Lenses will always be larger than Micro 4/3 lenses
Still wish it had a better navigation and control system, feels more like a gadget than camera sometimes
EVF sticks out quite a bit (but it does lock down) and makes the camera less portable
Should come with a lens rear cap and camera body cap in the box but it does not
Should have in body image stabilization!!!
Touch screen does not have a touch shutter like the E-P3
When the new Sony NEX-C3 arrived to me a few weeks ago I yawned. It was not enough of an improvement over the normal NEX-3 to warrant an upgrade IMO. When the 5n arrived to my doorstep I looked at it and almost yawned. It looked the same as the old 5 that I had shot with for a year but I know that looks can be deceiving. Regardless, I charged up the battery to see what it was all about expecting to write about it and say its a minor jump up from the old 5.
When I looked over my initial test shots I was amazed at the image quality coming out of the camera. The JPEGs have been improved dramatically and whatever Sony has done to the in camera processing, they did it right. The new 16.1 Megapixel APS-C sized sensor rocks and it is a huge step in the right direction to improve the NEX series of cameras. I only wish that they had a better lens than the 18-55 at this time because I know the sensor is capable of way more than the kit lenses give (even though things have improved in that area with the new sensor) after seeing the Leica glass on the camera.
The 1080 HD video is great on the 5n as well, giving you a plethora of options to choose from. I still like the 24P setting and many are in love with the new 60P option. You also have all manual control over video, which is also very welcome and appreciated. The Dynamic Range is improved as well and to my eye seems better than a Canon 5DII in that dept. Much better than Micro 4/3 in DR here guys.
Is it worth an upgrade if you have a normal 3 or 5? Well, tough to say. If you want the new features then it is worth it to you. If you do not need the extra resolution and feel you are getting what you need from the 3 or 5 already then I’d spend my money on a new lens like the Zeiss 24 1.8. The 5n does indeed up the ante in the IQ department but it is not CRAZY drastic better (though it is pretty damn good) and the old 5 is still a perfectly good camera. In use the camera feels the same though the shutter sounds better than the old clunky clunk of the old 3 and 5. When shooting with the EVF and you hear that slick sounding shutter sound you feel like you are shooting with a pro camera.
This baby also shoots at 10 frames per second though I admit I am not an action shooter. I remember when 7 FPS was a big deal on the pro DSLR’s. Now we have 10 FPS in a tiny camera that can fit into a coat pocket. Amazing. We also have some exciting new lenses on the way like the LONG awaited Zeiss 24 1.8, also the Sony 50 1.8 and 35 Macro plus a zoom or two. S0 lenses are coming for those NEX’ers who have been patiently waiting.
I wish Sony would release a FAST pancake that is small, something like the 20 1.7 for Micro 4/3. THAT would be amazing but sadly I do not think they can do it due to the larger sensor, which is quite a bit bigger than the M4/3 sensor. The lenses have to cover the imaging sensor so I do not think we will see small AF lenses on the NEX. Manual lenses? Yes. AF lenses? No.
I like the NEX-5n and if it was not for the NEX-7 coming out I would probably keep it. Hell, I may keep it anyway until the 7 arrives to do more Leica M glass experiments. I like what I see here so that just makes me even more excited to see the NEX-7 in action. The 5n is not perfect though as it could use better controls, a built in EVF, and a larger grip…WAIT, that sounds like the NEX-7, haha.
The bottom line is that Sony improved the 5 series and the 5n is an easy recommend as well as the best bang for the buck in the NEX line. At $699 with lens, I have to ask myself..” For the money does it get any better than this? The answer to that is NO!”
Where to buy the Sony NEX-5N?
This camera is available just about everywhere. I buy my Sony gear from B&H Photo or Amazon. B&H has the Sony NEX-5n at the links below:
Below are a few more images all shot with the 5n. Enjoy!
HELP ME TO KEEP THIS SITE GOING AND GROWING!! IT’S EASY TO HELP OUT & I CAN USE ALL THE HELP I CAN GET!
Remember, anytime you follow my links here and buy from B&H or AMAZON, this helps to keep my site going. If it was not for these links, there would be no way to fund this site, so I thank you in advance if you visit these links. I thank you more if you make a purchase! I have nifty search bars at the upper right of each page so you easily search for something at either store! I currently spend 10-14 hours a day working on this site and the only way that I can pay for it is with your help, so thank you! Currently my traffic has been increasing but my funds to pay for the site has been decreasing, so any help would be GREATLY appreciated!
Even if you buy baby food, napkins or toothpicks at amazon it helps this site, and you do not pay anything extra by using the links here. Again, you pay nothing extra by using my links, it is just a way to help support this site, so again, I thank you in advance
If you enjoyed this article/review, feel free to leave a comment at the bottom of this page and also be sure to join me on twitter or my new facebook fan page! Also, you can subscribe to my feed at my subscribe page HERE and read these posts in your browser or news reader!
UPDATE! This sold in UNDER TWO MINUTES! WOW! Exclusive Deal to SteveHuffPhoto.com readers! Leica 50 Summilux ASPH for $3600
OK, to anyone looking for the impossible to find Leica 50 Summilux ASPH lens I have something special for you! Don’t want to pay the $4500 and up prices on the used market? No need to! One lucky person on this site will be able to snag a “9” quality used 50 Lux ASPH for $3600. This will go fast so read on.
Lensrentals.com, a site sponsor e-mail me and asked if I wanted to buy an extra 50 Summilux ASPH they had in their office. I already own one so I said no, but I know about 500 others that do! So they said they wanted to offer this lens to my readers since there are so many looking for this amazing lens. In my opinion, this is about the best lens for the Leica M9 you can buy. Period. It is THE lens that stays on my M9P these days.
If you want the lens, CLICK HERE to get it but be quick as it will sell fast. Ships direct from lensrentals.com! By the way, if any of you are interested in renting gear before buying Lenrentals is the best I have found online. About two years ago I wanted to rent a Leica lens so I contacted them and tried out some Leica glass. The lenses arrived fast, well packed and it was so cool to try these lenses before buying. They rent all kinds of gear..Nikon, Canon, Olympus and the coolest thing is they rent Leica lenses and bodies and you can see what they offer for rental HERE.