The magic of the Leica Noctilux F1

Magic. A word that gets thrown around quite a bit in the Leica world and the Leica Noctilux F1 lens is one of the reasons why. Over the past few months, I have written a review for the new Leica Noctilux 0.95 lens (available at AMAZON here) as well as the Noctilux imitator, the Voigtlander 50 Nokton 1.1. I have thrown in comparisons in those reviews with the classic F1 Noctilux, but have never written a review for what I think is one of the most special Leica lenses ever created for the Leica M mount! As a matter of fact, the ONLY lens I own right now for my M9 is the 50 Noctilux F1. I bought mine used from Mr. Ken Hansen (you can e-mail him here if you are looking for one, as he may have one left). No way I could have afforded the 0.95 version.

So after shooting with this lens for a couple of month on my Leica M9 I decided to do a write up of this lens this morning. Instead of a “review” this will be mostly photos I have shot with this lens and why I think it is so special and inspiring.

The F1 Noctilux – Gorgeous!


“The Beautiful Beast”

Every time I pick up this lens I say, “MAN, this thing is a MONSTER…A BEAST” and I wonder why I own it. It kind of takes away the small and light feature of the M camera. With this lens on my M9, it is about as heavy as a bare-bones Nikon D3s! But after I take some shots, I realize the reason why I deal with the weight. The way this lens can render a scene is amazing and at certain times breathtaking. This is an F1 lens, meaning it is an ultra-fast design, useful for low-light shooting. While it is one of the most unique lenses I have ever owned, it is also one of the most expensive and is not a lens for everyone due to its weight and size, and cost. So yes, it is a beast but it is a beautiful beast!

With that said, lets get to some images! Here is a shot I took just before Christmas 2009. My cat was sitting on the top of a chair and some lights were on behind her. The room was dark otherwise. I set the M9 to ISO 2500 and the lens to F1 and fired the shutter. I then added some blue tinting using Nik Color Efex pro in Photoshop CS4. Here is the result…


Those highlight “blobs” are one of the signatures of the Noctilux and is one of the features of such a fast lens.

BTW, forget those who tell you ISO 2500 on the M9 is useless. It is not and the above image is proof of that. With this lens and the M9, you have a camera and lens combo that can shoot in just about any situation. Light, dim, and dark. For portraits, it renders in a very gentle way when shot wide open at F1.


[ad#Blog Square Embed Image]

“The Magical Swirl”

This lens is a classic–pure and simple. Even though there is now the $10,000 0.95 Noctilux, which is pretty much perfection in fast-lens design, this classic still has something magical about it. One thing is the very unique bokeh this lens can produce, the “Magical Swirl.” Many hate it, but some love it. Me, I am in the “love it” camp. I feel that there is no lens that can replicate it exactly. Sure, the Voigtlander 50 Nokton is a fast 1.1 lens, but it has a more corrected look with more sharp, even, and smooth bokeh.

One thing to realize is that the classic Noctilux is not razor sharp wide open. Rather is renders with a soft glow at F1. It also has swirly bokeh at times and just gives you a really unique look to your photos. Here is an image I shot at F1 to test the bokeh. When I saw this on my display I thought it looked like a painting. Very surreal. This is the kind of bokeh the lens can produce at F1 and as I said, no other M mount lens will replicate this look (that I have seen).


“My First Noct”

There are some classic lenses that come close to the Noctilux, like the Hexanon 60 F1.2 and the Noct Nikkor for Nikon. But for Leica, this Noctilux F1 is the low-light prince (the king is the new 0.95 version). This is the third Noctilux I have owned. The first was in 2002-2003 when I bought a new-in-box Noct from B&H Photo for $2995. I shot that lens on my Leica MP and M7 and came away with some memorable images. This was before the M8 or M9 and I was thrilled to own this lens. I eventually sold that lens and the one I have now is my THIRD in 7 years.

Here are a couple early Noctilux shots on my old M7 circa 2002/2003 with that first Noctilux:


I used the Noct a few years back as part of my homeless project with a Leica Mp and Tri-X film and loved the combo.




While some will say the Noct is not practical or worth the money, there will be those who say the opposite. If it fits your style and helps to inspire you then it is worth it. For me, this lens does just that. It helps to inspire me and gets my creative juices flowing.

“Shooting in the Dark”

Like I already mentioned, this lens along with an M8, M9, or even an M7, can shoot in the dark and still give you wonderful results. Here are  two images from a walk around Chicago at night, all on the M9 at F1:



Notice the clarity. Notice the noct color in the second shot. The one thing you will notice is that the classic Noctilux puts off a certain color cast that no other Leica lens gives you. It’s kind of a warm, sometimes yellowish tone. The new version renders colors perfectly with a snap and clarity not seen in the classic but some Noct owners prefer the signature that the F1 puts out.

The Noct is also great for capturing moments indoors in low light that is hard to do with slower lenses. Here I shot at F1 and ISO 640 I believe. We were in a hotel room and my sister had to give a breathing treatment to her son who has trouble at night with his breathing due to scarring of his lungs. Sure, I could have gotten this with a 50 1.4 but in many ways I prefer the way the Noctilux renders low light scenes.



Yes, I could go on and on, but I wanted to keep this short and sweet. Just a post to show my love for this special lens that I adore. The crazy thing is that as much as I love this lens I actually came close to selling  it last week! Dreaded G.A.S. and the need for cash got me to list it for sale. BUT, I changed my mind and managed to get through Christmas without the sale. Besides, I know from first hand experience that if I sold it, I would regret it because I regretted selling my first Noct for years. Why would I let this one go now when I enjoy it so much?

This is a lifetime-keeper lens, so I have to keep telling myself this, even when my lens lust kicks in and I want a new lens! I will eventually add another lens for my M9 and will be patient.

“The Magic”

Some say this lens is gimmicky, but I feel that it is actually a versatile lens. Even when shooting at F2-F8, it is wonderful. 98% of the time I shoot it wide open, as that is where the magic lies. There is that word again, magic. That is probably the one word that best describes this lens and why it popped up so much in this write up.

If you have one of these, shoot it more and enjoy it. If you do not own it, be sure to try it out at least once if you can. You may fall in love! BTW, I feel that this lens will be going up in price in the near futrure. I already see one on AMAZON for $7995! They are no longer in production so if you want one, and find a deal, snag it up!

UPDATE: I had a few emails asking how many versions of this lens are out there and which is the best. Well, the first F1 Noctilux was a child of the 70’s and the cost was a few hundred bucks. Maybe $500. The earliest version of the lens had an E58 filter size and a detachable hood. The latest version was introduced in 1994 and has an E60 filter size and built in slide out hood. Some think the lens coatings have changed between the versions and others say it has not. The only version I have shot with is the last E60 version and I love it. Deals can be found on the earlier versions though as I have seen them go for $4500-$4800 recently.

more info on the Noctilux versions:

1.) #11820: f1.2 – 58mm filter size – made between 1966-1975;

2.) #11821: f1 – 58mm filter size – detachable hood #12503 – made between 1976-1978;

3.) #11821: f1 – 60mm filter size – detachable hood #12539 (mounts on two posts on lens) – made between 1978-1982;

4.) #11821: f1 – 60mm filter size – detachable hood #12544 (attaches to lens via spring loaded clips) – made between 1982-1994

5.) #11822: f1 – 60mm filter size – built-in hood – 1994

6.) #11602: f0.95 60mm filter size – built-in hood – SIP

“Flaws, or cons of the Noctilux”

The Noctilux does have its flaws though, so let me list them out:

  • It is a HEAVY lens, though it is smaller and lighter than the new 0.95 version and smaller than most DSLR lenses.
  • It has a loooooong focus throw. This means it is slow to focus. It takes a long turn of the focus ring to lock it in. This is more precise, but slow.
  • It vignettes from F1-F4. To me, this adds to that Noctilux character.
  • The cost! These days a used example like mine (latest, built in hood, 6-bit coded, case) goes for about $5800 (on KEH). Yes, it is pricey, but it is cheaper than the $10,000 0.95.
  • It’s not perfect! Nope, sometimes you will see some funky bokeh. It is not perfect like the new one, but it does have charm.

I hope you have enjoyed my post on this unique lens. You may not be one who likes the lens but you can not deny it’s ability to suck in every bit of available light and provide M shooters with an ultra fast lens for their nocturnal needs.


Remember, anytime you follow my links here and buy from B&H or AMAZON, this helps to keep my site going. If it was not for these links, there would be no way to fund this site, so I thank you in advance if you visit these links. I thank you more if you make a purchase! Ha ha…

If you enjoyed this review, feel free to leave a comment at the bottom of this page and also be sure to join me on twitter or facebook! Also, you can subscribe to my feed at the upper right of any page and be notified of when new reviews are posted! You can also subscribe via E-mail (also to the right). Thanks so much for reading!

Here are a few more images from the Noctilux F1!








  1. Question: We’re ALL versions of the Noctilux f/1 manufactured in Canada ?……..or were any manufactured in Germany ?

    • Steve,
      The first Version Noctilux f/1.2 does not have a filter thread at all. Outer diameter is 52.5mm.
      Just wanted to clarify. Otherwise you’re on the money.
      Keep up the good work!

  2. Thank you Steve very informative , I have the latest version and shoot only slides , and it’s amazing to see my friends react to the images this lens produces , the life is very beautiful but when you stop time with this lens its magical ..

  3. Great write up Steve.

    If any of your website followers have a Noctilux f/0.95 and found out the new hi-tech qualities of this lens is not their cup of tea, and instead prefers to own a classic Noctilux f/1.0 because of the magical pictures it creates. I have a late model Noctilux f/1.0 (#11822) in ‘mint’ condition complete with original Leica lens pouch, caps, box, etc.. that I wish to trade for a Noctilux f/0.95.


  4. Along with many others visitors here – just a word of thanks to Steve Huff – I followed this site amongst others and in a large part it re-kindled my interest in taking snaps after 15 years of not taking a pic. Since December, I picked up an M8, 28/50/90 cron, 90 tele-elmarit, CV12 and just today, a F1 noc. I really can’t take pics for toffees but the noc (and the humble CV12) made the journey fun.

  5. Has anyone tried shooting at F1 focusing at infiniti and find it not sharp? Is this the characteristics of the lens or

  6. I agree, some of those images are magic. But, and it is a big one, a clean Summar on a good LTM camera is better.

  7. Hi Steve, I finally got my hands on a Noctilux. I think mine is the second version, with a detachable hood, and a “50” engraved on the barrel.

    Is there any significant difference between the versions?

    Also, mine as apparently sent to Solms Leica to be upgraded to a 6-bit, readjusted and recalibrated (I purchased it in that condition), and came back with a one year full warranty.

    And it’s like new in box. 🙂

    One issue is I need to remove the lens cap whenever I want to attach or detach the hood. Is there any pinch type lens cap for 60mm?

  8. i have got the 4th version of this f1 lens i wonder does it worth it to sell it and get the f0.95 version? or will money be better spent if i got a 50mm asph instead?

  9. Steve,

    Just curious if this lens is still your only one…and if so, any regrets? I’m actually strongly considering selling my 7 month old, mint 35mm Summilux for this amazing lens. I’ve been drooling over it for quite some time…! Hesitations are cost (of course) and size, but what a gorgeous image the Noctilux yields!

    Loving your reviews and insights, by the way-excellent work!

  10. Yes, this is a monster when it is widely opened and with the sharpness at f 5.6 making all my Lecia R and M leaving inside my dry-storage box. I’m on a long match replacing lens with Summilux or above (longing for M f1.2 75mm).
    My scrap rate with F1 on M6 was high but not in M8 due higher ISO. Focusing with M demand high concentration and acuity in low light and stops me at M8. If M10 features with most GF-1 or EP-2 advanced electronics, I’ll go for it.

  11. You have completely sold me on this lens. As soon as my grey top leica is in stock I’ll buy this lens as part of my dream kit. Cannot wait to use it! Very exciting project coming up!!!!

  12. It seems like a later lens (asph + coded). I’m extremely new to photography (usually shot P&S and don’t really know much about different lens lengths, speeds, etc…just been doing a lot of research online) so your comments as a (relatively) new Leica user is extremely valuable to me. How come it took you a while to start enjoying the Leica? How long did it take you before you started enjoying it? What did you find frustrating and what did you like at first?

  13. Dan, I am far from an expert. I am quite new with the Leica thing. I’m sure Steve can share more on this. Mine is Aspherical and 6 bit coded… It took me a while to start enjoying shooting with a Leica. Now I can’t hold my self. There some something about it that is very unique and special. Enjoy!

  14. Hi Martin – thanks for the advice! Any specific version of the 35 lux that I should be on the look out for?

  15. I got an M8 an a 35 lux (almost a 50 in this camera). It’s an amazing lens. I miss a bit a wider point of view, but it’s a must have lens at some point, so I think you cannot go wrong with it.

  16. Thanks for the quick response! For the 24 or 35, what do you think I should get…a cron? a lux? 1.2? 1.4?

  17. Hey Dan, you caught me online! Working on my X1 review 🙂

    I did use a Nocti on and M8 but a 50 on the M8 is more like a 65 so I would say to get a 24 or 35 for an M8 and one lens solution. The Noct is great but it is heavy and many M shooters do not like the weight. The lens is magic but it is not the best one lens solution. I’m just an oddball 🙂

  18. Steve – been reading lots of your reviews and you’ve inspired me to become a Leica owner! Was wondering if you have examples of an M8 + Nocti (I can’t afford an M9 yet and want to get my feet wet with a used/cheaper M8 first). Since lenses are a big part of the costs of the Leica system, I was hoping to figure out what lens I should get first. You mentioned that you only have this Nocti and your M9, so maybe it’s the only lens I’ll need for my M8? Any help or insight you can provide would be fabulous! Thanks again for making such a great resource for all sorts of Leica fans/owners.

  19. Steve,
    Fabulous shots. We know that there are a number of different version of the Noctilux. What are the various versions of this lens and how can I distinguish one from the other? Are there any versions that are preferable to the others? Or, are they all great! What are the serial numbers groups of the great ones? Thanks.

  20. I have the same Noctilux, and it is magical indeed. It is my favorite lens.
    In film days, the lens that was more often on my M6 was a 28 Elmarit, but today my first choice is the Noctilux attached to my M8.
    Your pictures represent the essence of what a Noctilux means, magic.

  21. Your love for this lens got me hooked. I have not yet tryed it, but you’ve got me thinking how to fund it. I live very shallow depth of field, actually like warm renditions, and the swirl in some of your images is what got me hooked. So… It’s a matter of time! Thanks for a very inspiring site.

  22. Great and to the point review, Steve. No reason to get technical, as it is a very artistic, lens to be appreciated for its unique qualities. I find myself shooting it more often, as I am now more comfortable with the long focus throw and I really do like its renditions when stopped down as well. LOVE those Tri-X shots of yours!

  23. Wow, Steve! I really enjoyed this page. Great photos seem to flow out of your camera without effort. I have the same combo but have not tried it yet. Thanks again for the inspiration.

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Twitted by monsieurnguyen
  2. At last… »

Comments are closed.