The Panasonic GX8. A One Day Hands on Report By Steve Huff


The Panasonic GX8. A One Day Hands on Report.

By Steve Huff

A couple of days ago I was able to get a hold of the new Panasonic GX8, but just for 2 days. While that is not time enough for a full detailed review, it is enough to say a few words on it as I am extensively experienced with all Olympus Micro 4/3 offerings, as well as the older GX series from Panasonic. I remember shooting and reviewing the previous GX7 (You can see it here) and I really enjoyed it, mostly thanks to the EVF that swiveled up and down and allowed me to get shots while holding the camera at my body. Also, Panasonic has a unique color signature just as Olympus does, Sony does, Leica does, Fuji does, etc.

I find the Panasonic color signature to be more on the cooler side, much like the Leica days with the M9, compared to the warmer side of Olympus and Sony and the newer Leica M 240 and Q.

I’ve always loved the Panasonic line of Micro 4/3 cameras and for many they are *the* body to choose. Me, I prefer the Olympus bodies for my personal use as the 5 AXIS IS, the design and size of them are always so appealing. For image quality, you can not go wrong with a Panasonic or Olympus, as both will get the job done. The new GX8 is nice but I quickly noticed that in my hand it feels a bit thick and meaty compared to the E-M5II and E-M10II from Olympus. In fact, it’s very close to the size of my Sony A7RII which is a full frame powerhouse! It surely is bigger than the old GX7 for sure. The body is anyway.

Lenses, ahhh yes, Micro 4/3 lenses. They are so damn awesome and amazing. For this review I used mainly the Olympus 7-14 f/2.8 pro as I love this lens. It has grown on me more and more since my review (see that here with the E-M10II) and I can say 100% that it is the best ultra wide lens I have ever used in my life. On any format.

Snapshots from the Fair – 7-14 Pro f/2.8 Olympus Lens



So this is not a review my friends, it is basically me showing a few snaps from the fair with my one day shooting the GX8 as well as some thoughts on it after shooting every Olympus body extensively. So this is a HANDS ON REPORT. 1st off, as I said the body feels much bigger to me in my hand than an Olympus E-M5II or E-M10II, especially the E-M10II as that is a TINY body. Curiosity got to me and I had to see this camera next to others just to see how big it really is. Thanks to the cool site,, we can check on such things quite easily 😉 it a tad large for what it is? It is indeed larger than the previous GX7.

1st up, size vs the E-M5 II from Olympus. The GX8 is slightly larger and beefier. Not as comfy feeling in the hand if you have small to medium hands. Large hands may feel more at home with the GX8 though as it does feel ticker and larger all the way around in use. 

Screen Shot 2015-10-19 at 8.57.37 AM

Next to the E-M10 Ii we see the GX8 is wider but the E-M10II is slightly taller. Still, when these are side by side in the hand (I have both here) the E-M10II feels much smaller. 

Screen Shot 2015-10-19 at 8.57.45 AM

Still wider than an E-M1 but not as tall. The E-M1 is the Oly tour de force pro Micro 4/3 camera, so I expect it to be the largest.

Screen Shot 2015-10-19 at 8.57.54 AM

Next to the A7RII, the full frame massive megapixel powerhouse which is in another league over the GX8 in every way including cost, but even though the sensor is MUCH larger in the Sony the GX8 is still wider and feels just as large when holding it in your hands. 

Screen Shot 2015-10-19 at 8.58.07 AM

So overall, the GX8 is not one of these mini Panasonic camera that they released year after year for a while. Nope, this is a REAL camera, a camera for the photographer or someone who really wants to really get into it. Basically, it will beat your phone in a big way but still offer you professional controls and results to grow with you. For anyone looking for a really good starter digital camera, I’d say skip the Canon rebel and go to something like a GX8 or E-M5II. These cameras are really fantastic but how did I like my shooting experience with the Panasonic vs the Olympus or even Sony? As always, just about any micro 4/3 body is a joy and pleasure to shoot.

The wide view at 7mm (14mm equivalent) is something for sure! It takes getting used to as finding interesting scenes with a ultra wide is challenging. 


B&W conversion using VSCO filters. Another day at the fair..



But…when using the GX8, somehow and someway it kept defaulting to “4K Photo Mode” and twice I had to reset the camera from within the menu as I had no instructions and after 15 minutes trying to find out what was happening, I could not. So I just  reset it every time this happened but I have no clue why or how this was happening over and over again. I am sure it was something simple but this is the first time ever I could not figure out an issue with a camera. Other than that, the camera gave me no problems. Auto focus was as fast or faster as any camera I have used that has good AF (beats the Sony, matches the Olympus) and the IQ was up there with the best of Micro 4/3, with a more crisp look to the files than I remember seeing with Olympus.

The pop up and out EVF is lovely, and I wish all manufacturers would use an EVF like this as it opens up more possibilities when shooting allowing interesting and different angles. It has a touch screen LCD as well, a nice big 3 inch one at that. It also has image stabilization though from my experience it doesn’t quite get close to the amazing 5 Axis in the Olympus bodies. The AF is quick though, and I noticed no hesitations or is what Panasonic says about the GX8’s new AF mode:


Depth-From-Defocus and Starlight AF Technologies

For accelerated autofocus performance, DFD (Depth-From-Defocus) technology is employed to quickly calculate the distance to subjects and adjust the focusing position in as little as 0.07 seconds, which enables continuous shooting up to 6 fps with continuous AF. This contrast-detection type focus method benefits both still and video recording modes, as well as subject tracking applications where subject color, size, and motion vectors are used to intelligently lock-onto the moving subjects and ensure precise focus. Additionally, supporting working in low-light conditions, a Starlight AF feature enables accurate AF performance down to -4 EV.

Benefitting manual focus operation, focus peaking is available that highlights bright edges of contrast with a colored outline for quickly recognizing your focus point, as well as Touch MF Assist for touch-to-focus operation.

In plain easy to understand language..the AF is VERY fast. Now, I did not use continuous AF in my one day of testing but the standard AF was blazing fast. Faster than the E-M5 II and E-M10II I have here.



So pretty cool on the Auto Focus front. 

As for the in body IS, I thought it was not very good. Nothing like the Olympus bodies. IQ wise, I always shoot RAW and I still slightly prefer the IQ from my Olympus bodies as I prefer warmer tones but there is a certain look to the Panasonic files, and I remember seeing this from the very early bodies and even the old G2 I reviewed HERE a long time ago.Seeing that this is $300 more than an Olympus E-M5 II, I would personally spring for the Olympus over this. It feels sleeker, has 5 Axis IS, is $897 vs $1197 and the IQ is different but not better than the GX8. All personal preference. The GX8 feels much bulkier in the hand but Panasonic has stepped up the game for sure with this model as they need to keep up with the ever innovating Olympus!

When the Olympus pro E-M1 came out I stated that Micro 4/3 can go head to head and match or beat any APS-C camera. I feel APS-C cameras should come to an end as Micro 4/3 can meet or exceed them in IQ but also offer a much smaller body, smaller lenses and fantastically sharp performance due to the lenses being able to be deigned so well for a smaller sensor. Micro 4/3 should be on anyones radar who is thinking of getting an APS-C camera. Canon rebel? Get an E-M5II or GX8 instead! Micro 4/3 has come a long way, and they are going nowhere. Even though many predicted the demise of it years ago, quite the opposite has happened. It has become more popular, more prevalent and more tech has come from Micro 43 than anywhere else. The lenses are fantastic, the bodies are as well with fast AF, gorgeous color and dynamic range and a fun factor that is hard to beat.

While these Micro 4/3 beauties can never compete with full frame, they offer not much less for a whole lot less money. The Micro 4/3 of today is so much better than the Micro 4/3 of yesterday. If you have not used the latest batch of cameras from Olympus or Panasonic, you should rent them sometime and see for yourself. Add a good prime lens and you are ready for fun, ease of use and gorgeous results.





My Final Thoughts after only a day of use..

As for the GX8, while a little bulkier and fatter than I had hoped, it is a powerhouse and after only shooting it one day I know I want to use this one more to review it properly as well as test against my Olympus bodies. It’s 100% the best Panasonic GX I have used to date and offers up 4K photo, 4K video, super fast AF (fastest in M 4/3) and unique features such as dual IS (need a lens with OIS and then it will use the body IS and lens IS together), pop up and out EVF, swivel out LCD (like E-M5Ii) and touch screen to boot. The usual suspects are here such as time lapse, pano, and filter effects that have been around now for 5 years.

The Menu System is typical Panasonic. Easy to read and use, but I find all menus easy to use once you learn them, and this camera is no exception. Newbies to the menu will be confused, but those who used Panasonic before will be right at home. The simplest menus in the business do not come from Olympus or Panasonic or Sony, they come from Leica who has the easiest to use menus of any recent modern digital camera ever.

Battery life seems very good, in line with Olympus and the fact that it takes all of the Micro 4/3 lenses as well as 3rd party lenses with adapters means you would never run out of lenses to shoot with any Micro 4/3, and yes, Olympus lenses can be used on the GX8 and vice versa as Panasonic and Olympus both are native Micro 4/3 lenses. The GX8 appears to be a winner, and the best GX yet from Panasonic. Is it enough for them to overtake Olympus? Probably not as I have a feeling Olympus is ready to drop a big bomb on any thunder the GX8 may have taken from them. Soon. Just a hunch. 🙂

if I can get a hold of this for 2 weeks I will post an official review soon 😉

Where to buy?

You can see more or buy the Panasonic GX8 at B&H HERE 

You can buy or see more of the GX8 at AMAZON HERE




Hello to all! For the past 7 years I have been running this website and it has grown to beyond my wildest dreams. Some days this very website has over 200,000 visitors and because of this I need and use superfast dedicated web servers to host the site. Running this site costs quite a bit of cash every single month and on top of that, I work full-time 60+ hours a week on it each and every single day of the week (I received 200-300 emails a DAY). Because of this, I need YOUR help to cover my costs for this free information that is provided on a daily basis.

To help out it is simple, and no, I am not asking you for a penny!

If you ever decide to make a purchase from B&H Photo or Amazon, for ANYTHING, even can help me without spending a penny to do so. If you use my links to make your purchase (when you click a link here and it takes you to B&H or Amazon, that is using my links as once there you can buy anything and I will get a teeny small credit) you will in turn be helping this site to keep on going and keep on growing.

Not only do I spend money on fast hosting but I also spend it on cameras to buy to review, lenses to review, bags to review, gas and travel, and a slew of other things. You would be amazed at what it costs me just to maintain this website, in money and time. Many times I give away these items in contests to help give back you all of YOU.

So all I ask is that if you find the free info on this website useful AND you ever need to make a purchase at B&H Photo or Amazon, just use the links below. You can even bookmark the Amazon link and use it anytime you buy something. It costs you nothing extra but will provide me and this site with a dollar or two to keep on trucking along.

AMAZON LINK (you can bookmark this one)

B&H PHOTO LINK – (not bookmark able) Can also use my search bar on the right side or links within reviews, anytime.

Outside of the USA? Use my worldwide Amazon links HERE!

You can also follow me on Facebook, TwitterGoogle + or YouTube. 😉

One other way to help is by donation. If you want to donate to this site, any amount you choose, even $5, you can do so using the paypal link HERE and enter in your donation amount. All donations help to keep this site going and growing! I do not charge any member fees so your donations go a long way to keeping this site loaded with useful content. Thank you!


  1. Hi Steve were you able to get your hands on a unit so you can do a full review? I’m looking to purchase one but want to get more thoughts from you. Initially, I was held off by the size of the camera but when I got to test one out a few days ago, I found out that it’s the most comfortable camera I’ve ever held, the boxy rangefinder look is also very appealing.

    • Sounds like you answered your own questions…you like it, most comfy you have ever held, love the can’t o wrong then 🙂 It’s a great M 4/3 camera no doubt and if you prefer Panasonic to Olympus then there is no other choice! Its fast, has great IQ, and has great ergonomics including the swivel EVF. Only thing I miss from the Olympus line is the 5 Axis IS, Live Time and Live Composite.

  2. I love m43 gear and had an EM5 and a GX7, but I eventually sold the cameras and now I only have my Nikon D600 and a couple of lenses. Why? Because I found that the M43 gear was not substantially smaller and lighter than the FF gear, I get better image quality from my D600, the files are extremely forgiving, and cost wise I spent less on my FF gear.

    The big difference is that for the D600 I have access to an astonishing number of lenses at excellent second-hand prices, whereas for good lenses in m43 it is difficult to find them on the used market and new they cost an arm and a leg. Yes if you compare new the m43 lenses are cheaper, but I don’t want to buy new. So I have a D600 with a 24-85mm Nikkor, A 28-105 Nikkor, and a 50mm f1.8 and the whole lot cost me 1150 Euros. The Lumix GX8 with the 14-140mm costs 1520 Euros new. Add a 20mm, 25mm or 45mm lens, or the 12-35mm lens, and the price goes over 2000 euros.

    There are nice features in the GX8 and I would love to have one, but if I can only afford one setup then my full frame setup makes more sense.

    I found my EM5 and GX7 as much of a hindrance as the D600 when I was just out with the family, so nothing gained by scaling down, I still had to have it in a bag or around my neck.

    Now I fall back on my Coolpix A when I just want to have fun while out with the family, it is genuinely pocketable and being a fixed lens there is no desire to buy more lenses.

    I think if m43 had been cheaper and with more used lenses available at prices below FF lenses, I would have seriously considered an additional setup, but as things stand I am having a hard time justifying the expense of it compared with the perceived gains in terms of size and weight. Am I the only one thinking this way?

    • Only a personal preference, I think m43 shines when a number factors are all dialed in.
      (for me, it is best picture quality+ lightest+smallest, ergonoimics+price)

      Given the above, I either have to buy a Leica M+50mm Lux for $11K, or I buy a gx8+25mm Lux for $2K. I can say this for all the lens range.

      Canon, Nikons, etc won’t meet at least the last three criteria…

  3. I am a long time EM1 user and rented the GX8 for a 10 day trip to Taiwan. I absolutely love it. I find it a joy to use and do think it is Panasonics best camera yet. I am posting images on my blog It is large but it has a fantastic grip and an outstanding viewfinder. Hope you can do a full review sometime in the future.

      • “I used mainly the Olympus 7-14 f/2.8 pro as I love this lens. It has grown on me more and more since my review (see that here with the E-M10II) and I can say 100% that it is the best ultra wide lens I have ever used in my life”


        My experience with this lens is 100% opposite of yours. I find the geometric distortion mind bugling for mid to close range. I used it on panasonic bodies

        • This lens is amazing, astounding and one of the most well reviewed ultra wides on the market. Try it on an E-M1 or E-M5II or E-M10II. I loved it on Oly or Panasonic. Had no issues at all.

          • Well, I have tried it. And people’s heads look like mal-formed watermelon, absolutely unusable. Maybe it works for far distance landscape?? that’s most use it anyway. Again, I used it on panasonic bodies only. Maybe oly does internal corrections.

          • You must not be familiar with Ultra wides. There is no ultra wide in existence (lets say 14mm which is what the 7mm equals in 35mm) that will not do that. ANY ULtrawide will distort anything at the edges of the frame, ANY Ultra wide from canon, Leica, Sony, Olympus..any lens. An ultra wide is the most challenging to use but if you use it up close and shoot a person anywhere off center, be prepared for distortion. Thats the nature of the beast. They have to be used in the right context. Just like the Voigtlander 15 4.5 which has virtually no distortion but of course you will still get the distortion at the edges as its an ultra wide and how they work.

          • Steve, I’m 65 yrs old, and a photographer most of that time.There is distortion and there is distortion. I dismiss this oly lens unequivocally as a distortion free, all around lens. This lens is quite bad as an all round lens. It is an acceptable lens for landscape and some other situation where distortion can be ignored because there is something else to look at.

            And no, the voigtlander 15 is NOT the benchmark for performance, take a look nd try Zeiss Hologon 16mm f8, that was a benchmark lens in small format lenses. For a good sum of money people converted it to Leica M series because it was that good, far better than anything that Leica ever produced.

            The olympus 7-14mm f2.8 is acceptable for distant subjects where the actual shape of objects are not important.

            Of course, you can remove the distortion digitally but then you lose angle of view.

            Sorry, I read your articles as reasonable observatins, and I can overlook minor opinion differences, but I can not overlook miss-information where people might use to spend their hard earned money.

            This lens in my opinion is sharp, fast, well built, and a reasonable performance for its focal lneght, for subjects at greater distances. It is not a lens for taking picture of people in a room or any such distance.

            At the end any reader should see this as matter of opinions, I think.


  4. One thing to consider is the hybrid stabilization the Gx8 offers will not be used to it’s full potential with the Olympus lens or a pana lens w/o OIS.

    I bet Oly still has the edge on stabilization, but the pana hybrid may be better than your initial observation.

    • Hello Noah, Do you have a Facebook page also. There are so many interesting blog I loose track often to check them regularly. But I’m check FB everyday and most bloggers post there update links on FB. I use a GX8, so I be interested in you experiences with this camera.

  5. No mention of the GX8’s breakthrough 20MP sensor, Steve? Perhaps intentionally silent on it, reserving detailed comments on the landmark sensor for the review itself, I guess.

    • Yes, I had this for such a short time I really had no time to really dig in, so I did not feel calling this a review would be right, as it is not a review. When I do, I will compare with the Oly’s and go into much more detail on what this camera does 😉 Thanks!

      • Hello there!

        I’m new here and thinking of buying either the EM5 II or the GX8. Some background info about myself is that I like to travel and explore, and I want an awesome cam to bring along with me to capture the beautiful moments. I’m not a pro at all, but I have a lot of interest and have finally decided to invest in a mirrorless cam. Yay me!

        BUT! I’m really torn between these two, the EM5 II or the GX8! I’m looking for something with great quality stills and video, future-proof (so-to-speak), and something that will grow old with me. I really like Oly’s 5-axis IS over the Panny’s dual IS. On the other hand, I like that Panny has 20MP and 4K. Both are weather-proof, but I’ve read several reviews and reports from Oly users that the built of the EM5 II is not so good with parts falling off or screen malfunctioning. I also read that Oly’s menu is very confusing, and would be a great challenge for an amateur photographer like me. I guess the thought of it is just a bit daunting, though I prolly think that over a long period of time I’ll get use to the interface.

        Did you manage to do a full review between these two cams, or maybe I’m not looking at the right places here? It will help me greatly in picking out the best cam for me.

        Thanks a lot! 🙂

    • I own and use a GX8 since two months now. Got one of the first shippings available in NL I guess. Really had to get use to it. It is indeed a bit of a bulky body. But it shape and layout is very minimalistic. Almost stealth! No one really looks or bother to give the camera attention. Not good for showing of but great for reportage photography. Stick a bit of black tape over the Lumix word and it is totally stealth! The body is also weather sealed.

      About the sensor. I don’t do maths, but my experience in real life = that it is a bit better as the 16mp in the Olympus bodies. For the first time in many, many years I even shoot jpg only when shooting sports like soccer competition. Even at higher iso the jpg come out with nice detail. In the custom settings I turn off noise reduction or set this to low. Got some good shoots still at iso 4000 or 5000.

      Overal I like the GX8 so far. But it had to grow. And maybe the body isn’t that small, the lenses still are!! If you use some of the nice pancakes it is still very compact. An A7 body might have the same wide, but ad a lens and it is a whole different story.

      • Thanks for your input. The thing about the Gx7 or E-M-5 is that they are a bit too big to pocket, and a bit too small to fit comfortably in my hands. I see the point in making the Gx8 a larger camera in this sense.

    • He’s is not writing that. I am a pro and shoot with whatever I thinks suits the job. I even use compact camera’s and get payed for those pics without any questions. The ‘pro’ or not is a mindset, it is not the camera. Those are just toys or tools.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.