MY LEICA X1 REVIEW IS HERE! IS THIS THE BEST COMPACT DIGITAL CAMERA EVER?
OH MY GOODNESS! The last 3 weeks have been some of the funnest times and also some of the most frustrating times I have had shooting a camera. I have been shooting and vigorously testing a Leica X1 and man oh man, this thing is like a pack of firecrackers, with the occasional dud. Leica sent me the camera in all of its packaging, along with a grip and leather ever ready case for review and I have to say, the packaging puts even Apple to shame! The X1 presentation is super fun.
But before I get started, I want to address those of you who have never read one of my reviews before. This review will be a REAL WORLD use review of the Leica X1. No charts, no boring graphs, and none of the nonsense that in all reality has absolutely NOTHING to do with real photography. I could care less what a chart shows me. I want to take the camera out in the real world and shoot the hell out of it. I want to see if it is dependable, how it holds up, as well as the quality and “usability factor” of the camera. Yes, taking real images should be the test of any camera so welcome to the beginning of what may just be my most lengthy review yet.
First off, since I want you to share the experience and excitement with me, check out this “un-boxing video” I made so you can see the care and love that went into the creation of the Leica X1 box:
Yes, it is true that packaging does not make or break a camera, but I have to give a point here for presentation. This is the best packaging I have ever seen for any camera, ever. When opening it for the first time you have a feeling like, “This has to be the best camera ever!” So, the packaging is awesome and Leica did a great job. What about the specs on the camera? Why is it so special and WHY on earth does it cost $2,000? Yes, this little guy is $2k, but look at it this way: It is about $4k cheaper than a used M8 and 24 Elmarit lens and about $900 more than an Olympus E-P2 with kit lens (E-P2 at Amazon). It has the red dot folks, and the name “Leica” and $2k in Leica land is pretty cheap these days. For those that can not shell out the big bucks for an M8 or M9 and a lens, the X1 looks like it could be the first “real” Leica for many photographers.
Let’s face it, the X1 is trying to be the best semi-compact on the market, but many were upset that the X1 was not an interchangeable lens camera. Leica decided to keep it simple, and therefore they built in a nice, high-quality lens into the X1. But is the Leica X1 up to the task of beating the Micro 4/3 cameras? At double the price of those hot cameras it really needs to have something special to get buyers to part with their hard earned cash. Others will buy it just because it is a Leica so no matter what, Leica will sell quite a few of these. What I wanted to know is if it was worth the premium in price over comparable cameras in PERFORMANCE and quality of image.
Let’s get to business and go over the features. But first, a photo from a store window display two days before Christmas. Click image for larger version.
Leica X1 – F4 – ISO 200 – 1/30s – This is the same look the M8 and 24 Elmarit gave me. Impressive OOC color.
THE LEICA X1 FEATURES AND SPECS AS LISTED ON THE B&H PHOTO WEBSITE, WITH MY COMMENTARY ON EACH:
• Large CMOS Sensor
The X1 is built around a 12.2MP CMOS image sensor that’s as large (23.6 x 15.8mm) as those in high-quality SLRs.
Yep! The Sensor in this camera is the big deal. Most compacts have tiny sensors and the only other semi-compact cameras that have somewhat large sensors are the micro 4/3 cameras, like the Panasonic GF1 and the Olympus E-P2. The X1 sensor is bigger than those and therefore will give you better image quality and high ISO quality. After three weeks with this camera, I can positively say yes, this sensor is superb for the X1. But new cameras on the horizon, like the Ricoh GXR and Samsung NX-10, also feature APS-C sensor sizes and come in somewhat cheaper while adding more flexibility with interchangeable lenses and even swappable sensors. But damn, this is a Leica and it has something about it that makes you fall for it! As for the sensor, it’s terrific and a great match for the X1.
• The Leica Elmarit 24mm f/2.8 ASPH.
The Leica Elmarit 24 mm f/2.8 ASPH. is a true Leica non-interchangeable lens with superior optical performance. When seen in terms of 35-mm film format, it has a focal length of 35mm.
Many seem to think this is not a “real” Leica 24 Elmarit. Well, after 3 weeks of daily use, I can tell you it is a real Leica lens, or at least it performs like one. The X1 has been giving me the the quality I expect in a Leica lens. Yes the barrel is plastic, and the lens is less substantial, but the quality IS indeed there in the images.
• Complete Control
In Automatic Mode, the camera takes control quickly, providing settings for precise exposures. With analog-style manual controls, using the wheels on top of the camera, the photographer can adjust shutter speed and aperture.
This is one of the things I love about the X1. It is simplicity at its finest… No menus to dig through, just dials. Rotate one dial to set your shutter speed and one to set your aperture. You can shoot in manual or A mode (aperture priority). There is also a dedicated ISO button on the back. My only complaint is that the dials move too easily and during my use they occasionally rotated away from where I had them set. They need to click into place with more authority because as it is, they are a bit too loose.
• 2.7″ Display
The bright 2.7″ display of the X1 almost fills the entire back of the camera and reveals the finest details even in bright surroundings.
Well, the LCD is not up to par with a Panny GF1 or the upcoming Samsung NX-10, but it does the job it is there to do. No issues or problems with the LCD. Hell, I am fine with the lousy M9 LCD, as it doesn’t make or break my images.
• Live View
The live-view function replaces an optical viewfinder and shows an accurate preview with all essential image information. The Live Mode also makes the X1 particularly versatile for shots taken from unusual perspectives.
I did not have any problems shooting without a viewfinder. I actually had fun shooting the X1 using the LCD and if I bought one, would not buy the external VF.
• Precision Autofocus
The autofocus of the X1 provides fast, precision focusing enabling photographers a choice of 1 or 11 AF segments and an additional high-speed mode for each.
Uggg. Fast should not really be mentioned here when talking about A. Precision, yes. Fast, not really. More on this later…
• Face Detection Technology
When taking photos of people, face-recognition mode allows users complete concentration on the composition and framing of the picture.
I never use this feature and find it useless, but I guess some do use it. I have to be honest, I forgot to even try it. I’m not a “face detection” kind of guy, I guess.
• Universal Formats
The X1 transforms image data into JPEG files for immediate use or photographers can choose to save images in the Adobe Digital Negative (DNG), a format that allows image-relevant exploitation of all the benefits of the recorded sensor data.
The JPG’s are great, but DNG is the way to go for serious work.
• Retractable Flash
The LEICA X1 features a retractable flash, which serves as a main flash but can also be used as a fill-in flash and can be synchronized to the second shutter curtain. If more power and flexibility is required, the Leica SF 24D and SF 58 system flash units (not included) are also compatible.
The flash was never really used by me, but I did do a test shot or two and it is flashy just like any flash. It works fine. I like the way they implemented it in the camera and it adds to the style and design. Very unique.
• Workflow Solution
With Adobe Photoshop Lightroom, a professional digital workflow solution, also available as an online download free of charge for all Leica X1 customers. It helps keep files organized and can process the X1 DNG raw files.
This is cool. You get a free full download of Adobe Lightroom with the purchase!
• Precision Engineering
Product of 100-years of German engineering experience.
But remember 94 of those years were with film cameras! The previous compacts were made by Panasonic and this is Leica’s 1st “in-house” digital compact!
• Warranty
2-Year International Warranty
So there you go. The X1 is a digital camera that is not filled with tons of gadgets and gimmiks. No art filters, no scene modes, and NO, it does not record video (but really, did we ever need that with film)? Like I said, it is a Leica and it is made to do ONE job and do it well. With the way the internet is, the rumors on the forums are flowing with bad talk on the X1 and I am happy I was able to shoot with one for a while to see for myself if this is fact or fiction. But I admit, after holding this thing, I had some high hopes.
One thing you will notice is the camera does NOT have a viewfinder. It’s all on the LCD, but Leica is releasing an external VF and it is NOT an EVF. It is also going to be pricey at $349.95. You can see it here. IMO, this is a bit pricey for an old-style VF. They should have built one in to the camera IMO, like the old film CM’s.
THE CAMERA AND MY 1st IMPRESSIONS WHEN I FIRST HELD IT
When I first cracked the box of the X1 I imagined a small, light, sexy body was inside and I was NOT disappointed (as you saw in the video). This thing is GORGEOUS and looks like a slimmer mini steel grey M9. It looks like a Leica through and through. After handling it and drooling a bit, I charged up the battery and attached the leather strap that came in the box. While the battery was charging, I decided to get some shots of the camera for the review:
With the Grip which I HIGHLY recommend. I’m not a huge fan of the M9 grip, but feel it improves the X1’s feel greatly.

Without the Grip…

The Top Control Dials…

The camera is sexy and sleek, but lightweight. Do not expect to hold it and have it feel like a mini brick. It’s quite light and some may confuse this with low- build quality. I do not feel this way. After using it for 3 solid weeks I can say the build is decent (though the grey finish is fragile) and the camera is light for a reason. If it were as heavy as my M9, what would be the point of the camera? The X1 is meant to be a compact, light, take anywhere and everywhere camera and it succeeds in this regard.
I was not disappointed at all in the build. I mean, I feel the Canon 5DII’s build feels cheap-ish and that camera costs $2700. It has a creaky cheap plastic battery door (the 5DII) so the X1, for being $2,000, has decent build. Not great, not M-like, not Nikon D700 like, but I really did not expect it to be for $2000 (remember, this is Leica land). As I said, do not expect an M build. It’s light and feels somewhat hollow.
Here it is next to my M9 and Noctilux. What a great looking pair, huh? It’s funny that the less expensive and smaller X1 has a larger LCD than the M9.


I LOVE LEICA CAMERAS, BUT WILL THE X1 WIN ME OVER AS A COMPACT COMPANION FOR MY M9?
It begins…WEEK 1 with the X1…
Before I go into this review head on, I have to warn you that I am a Leica shooter and have been for a few years. I currently own and shoot an M9 and before that an M8.2 and M8. I love the design of rangefinder cameras as well as the small size and superb quality. My M9 has been my constant companion and goes with me EVERYWHERE! When I heard about the X1 and saw some of the early samples and then found out it was going to be $2000, I thought ,“Uh Oh…Leica is doomed!” With the great M4/3 cameras out like the Panasonic GF1 and Olympus E-P2 under $1,000, I knew the X1 would have a hard time competing at double the price. But then again, the X1 has that large APS-C sensor which should provide superior IQ, and then there are the Leica nuts like me who really want to love and own anything Leica.
But when the first Leica X1 samples hit the web, I was disappointed. They were not so hot. The color was bad, the images were overexposed, and they just did not look good to my eye. I decided right then and there that the X1 would not be for me. However, I was getting so many e-mails asking me when I would review it, so I asked Leica for a sample and they eventually sent me the camera along with the latest firmware (which is now V1.00).
It was perfect timing because I was planning a 3-day Chicago trip to shop and browse the shops before Christmas with the family. We had three days on Michigan Avenue and I planned to bring my M9 and Noctilux, the Olympus E-P2, the 14-42 Kit Zoom, and of course, the X1, which was to be with me at all times strapped around my body. I wanted to shoot it at low ISO, high ISO, as well as during the day and the night.
I heard about all of the Auto Focus chatter about how it was slow as molasses and I had a buddy who was shooting with the X1 as well. He also told me of the slower AF and how the camera was not up to par with the M4/3 cameras in the AF speed dept. So, I was prepared for the worst. But before I talk about the AF, let me share with you the first X1 image I took.
LEICA X1 FIRST SHOT AND OUT OF CAMERA JPEG QUALITY THOUGHTS.
Before we left, I snapped this image of my son with the X1 at F4 and ISO 100:
“Brandon” – Leica X1 at F4, ISO 100 – Slight PP for contrast and color desaturation – Click image for larger version
WHOA! When I saw this on my new 27″ IMac, I was floored. The image above has had some SLIGHT PP and is from a converted RAW DNG, but even the JPEG was decent. What impressed me was the tonality, the richness, and the out-of-focus area. It was shot at F4 and still had some background blur. Nice. The color, detail, and tonality surprised me and right then and there I remember telling my wife that I wanted the camera. YES, I felt the IQ was stellar. Better than any compact I have tried to date, even the slow as a turtle Sigma DP1 and DP2. Oh yea, and the shutter is near silent. Just a faint click is all you hear. This is a good thing.
After checking out the RAW file, I opened up the JPEG and zoomed in to look at the 100% file. DAMN, the X1 JPEGs are not bad at all! Better than my M9 JPEGS–no doubt! Why are the M9’s JPEGs not even close? One thing was for sure, the X1 could be used as a JPEG-only camera if all you shoot is family snaps and casual pics. I thought that I read online that the X1 JPEGS pretty much sucked, but to me they are not bad at all. A little over sharp but that can be turned down in camera.
So Let me repeat…the JPEGS are great. They are so good in fact that I could see myself taking this camera with me and shooting JPEG’s and not worrying one bit about the quality. Since I would not use the X1 as a pro camera for paid jobs (though I would for landscapes), its duty would mainly be family snaps. For this, the X1 JPEG output would be great. DON’T GET ME WRONG, THOUGH! RAW is always best and will give you control over color, white balance, and all of that, but for fun everyday snaps, JPEG is fine. For serious work, RAW is best! Bottom line is I found the JPEG output to be the best I have seen in any digital camera since the old Digilux 2!
Below is a 100% crop from the untouched JPEG, then the RAW crop for comparison. As you can see, the in camera sharpening is a bit aggressive.


So you will not see any soft JPEG output with the X1, but shooting RAW will provide you with more control over your final result and give you smoother tones.
OK, WHAT ABOUT THE AUTO FOCUS? IS IT DOG SLOW, DECENT, OR FAST? CAN IT BE USED FOR STREET?
The big controversy with the X1 is all the talk about its Auto Focus being really slow. Well, I shot this camera during the day and during the night and can say that the AF is indeed slow. It’s not nearly as snappy or fast as a Panasonic GF1 (which is $899 with lens) and what I came to realize was that the X1 is NOT a camera for shooting action, decisive moment street, or basically anything that is moving quickly, as you will most likely miss it. It’s just not responsive enough for that kind of shooting. As much as I enjoy Leica cameras and lenses, and as much as I want to sit here and write that it is a faster camera for street shooting that a Panny GF1, I can not. But, it is also not as slow as some lead you to believe. Still, for $2,000, it should be better in the AF dept. and this is really the ONLY area where the X1 frustrated me at times.
Here is a short video I made showing you AF in low, medium, and brighter light. It took the X1 anywhere from 1 second to 3 seconds to lock focus.
You can indeed shoot on the street with this camera and I have done so, even at night. Just be prepared to miss some shots and to take more time getting a shot. Just remember, if you try to catch a decisive moment with the AF on the X1, you will need luck on your side. I feel an M is faster with manual focus. But for semi-stationary subjects, the X1 can be magical and it will reward you with quality better than ANY compact available today.
Here is an image I shot at night, but the guy was as stationary as can be. It took me about 1.5 seconds to lock focus for this shot and I probably could have been just as fast, if not faster with my M9. BUT….the quality I was able to get at night with high ISO has been absolutely AMAZING! This camera does high ISO better than the $7000 M9, better than ANY of the M4/3 cameras ,and it ranks up there with DSLR’s like the Nikon D300.
Leica X1 – ISO 1600 – F2.8 1/30s – Click image for larger version. Converted to B&W with Nik Silver Efex Pro. Download full size color version.
So low-light quality is superb and this got me to thinking. If I shot this with the M9 and 35 Summicron at 2.8 and ISO 1600, I am guessing it would not be any better than this. Everything here is great. The detail, the sharpness, and the noise. The way the lens captured what light there was. The AF took about as long as it would take me to MF the M8 or M9, so the X1 may not really be such a problem with its slower AF. I started to think of it as a mini-M with a built-in 35 Elmarit 2.8 lens (I know there is no such thing as a 35 Elmarit, but the 24 on the X1 is a 35 2.8 Equiv) for $1995. Hmmmm.
Here is another image I shot. This one was at ISO 125, F4 at 1/30s. The AF locked fairly quick here (on the 2nd try), yet still took long enough for these guys to notice me and point at the camera. This is converted from RAW using ADC 5.6 and I desaturated the colors a bit. Click image for larger version.
and a couple more…
“Bear Paws” – Leica X1 – ISO 400 – F2.8 – No PP
“Feeding the Pigeons” – Leica X1 – F2.8 – ISO 100 – B&W Mode
So while I was walking the streets of Chicago with the X1 and Olympus E-P2, I would shoot all day and then go to my hotel room to check out the files. Every single time the X1 beat the E-P2 for image quality, especially at the higher ISO’s. Plain and simple. No contest. For all of you Leica lovers, The X1 does have that special Leica quality. The sharpness, the color, the detail. It’s all there. The files have a “brilliance,” much like the M9 with M glass and that is excellent. Before I received the camera, I was worried most about the image quality and it turns out that this is the cameras biggest and best strength.
HOWEVER, on the Olympus I was using the kit zoom. Not the best quality lens to go against the Leica. Still, to buy another higher quality lens for the E-P2 raises my investment there to about $1500, if I bought a Panasonic 20 1.7 for $399…Just $500 away from the Leica X1. Even with a 20 1.7, the E-P2 would be no match for the IQ of the X1 in the mid to higher ISO range.
While shooting, I did miss a few moments with the X1 due to the AF speed, so I decided to try and use manual focus. I set the focus for 6 feet and shot a few as I walked. No go. While I managed to get some interesting images, nothing really stood out. Here is one image from that experiment:
I am not a fan of the X1’s manual focus implementation. You have to turn a dial on the back of the camera to focus and it’s slow, cumbersome, and would take you 5X longer than using AF. Setting the MF for street using distance is kind of hit or miss and is not even close to using an M lens on an M8 or M9. Why didn’t Leica attach a lens with full manual control? That would have been sweet.
So the MF implementation could be improved and should be in the X2 or whatever is next when this camera is eventually upgraded/updated. Leica, give us faster AF and manual controls on the lens! You did it with the Digilux 2, why not the X1?
To get back on track and to answer the question about wether the X1 could be used as a street camera I would say YES it could… but be prepared for some frustrating moments. I suppose if you shot it on the street daily for a month you would eventually get to the point where you would be churning out some great images. The bottom line on the AF is that it is slower than the micro 4/3 Panasonic GF1. It’s ALMOST as fast as the Olympus E-P1/E-P2, so it is not “dog slow” or horrible. It is just not a fast, speedy camera. Like I said, if you plan to shoot mainly stationary subjects (I usually do), then the X1’s image quality actually sets the standard for compact cameras. If IQ is your thing and speed is not, you will love the X1.
After all, the X1 is NOT a DSLR and the AF is probably on par with the D-Lux 4. The X1 is sort of a D-Lux 4 on steroids now that I think of it.
HIGH ISO AND TAKE ANYWHERE SIZE = I LOVE X1!
One shot that I really liked was this one of me and my wife. I set the X1 to ISO 3200 and held it up to the mirror as she kissed me. I converted it to B&W using Silver Efex Pro and here is the result:
Leica X1 – F2.8 – ISO 3200 – No noise reduction
This is one of my favorite images of recent months and if I tried this with my M9 it would be hit or miss. The X1’s AF worked fine here and snapped the shot. I was amazed at the quality for an ISO 3200 shot. This is something even the M9 could not do, as it does not go to 3200! But, I could have shot it at 1600 with a slower shutter speed. Still, I like the combo of the X1’s ISO 3200 and Black & White and the AF came through for me here no problem. BTW, it locked fairly quick here (E-P2 speed).
Another at ISO 3200. I just so happened to fire the shutter right when my son fired his D3000 shutter and flash:
and here is one at ISO 1600 and F2.8 in VERY low light. Taken at Genos East in Chicago. They literally have NO LIGHT and the tables are VERY dark. It was not really a problem for the X1, even with its somewhat “slow” F2.8 lens. Converted to B&W:
After snapping that “kissing” image, the X1 seriously started to grow on me and I was compiling a ton of “keeper” images! I cannot fit them all here, but as you can see, this review is getting long and I have only shown you a few of the images so far! The X1 was a very easy camera for ME to like during week one. To some, the X1 will be the camera of their dreams. To others, it will not. It all depends on your AF expectations.
In the first paragraph of this review, I mentioned the X1 was like a pack of firecrackers with the occasional dud. What I meant by that is that the X1 has so much going for it with it’s style, size, and image quality, but the AF is the one thing holding it back. You may miss a few shots because of it. Again, it all comes down to what you shoot.
After the first week with the camera, I was actually loving it and did not mind the slower AF. The image quality made up for it in my mind and I put my name on my dealer’s list to buy one. I decided I would explain to the wife later and sell something to fund it. But, would week 2 with the camera change my mind? Would the honeymoon period end and more importantly, would the wife like it better than her new E-P2?
“Father and Son” – Shot by my wife Mina with the Leica X1 – F2.8 – ISO 640 – Silver Efex Pro
WEEK 2 & 3 WITH THE LEICA X1 & A COMPARISON WITH THE OLYMPUS E-P2
So week one went by and decided I wanted my own X1. I fell in love with the IQ and high ISO performance and while I was not thrilled with the sometimes slow response time, I realized 95% of my shots were of stationary subjects. Let’s get real. The X1 is not going to be bought by someone who shoots sports, action, or wildlife. It’s an everyday camera… One that you can take snapshots with, or even portraits. I see it as a tag along to a DSLR or an M8 or M9, even a replacement for those who shoot a D-Lux 4. The X1 is NOT a DSLR, so it is not going to have DSLR speed. Plain and Simple.
The question that kept going through my head was, “Is the $2,000 price tag worth it over the more versatile $1100 E-P2 or $900 GF1?” In other words, is the image quality THAT MUCH BETTER than the m4/3 cameras? Well, I decided to do some testing. Below you will see a shot of an old house. One shot was taken with the $2,000 LEICA X1, one with the $1,099 Olympus E-P2. Both were shot RAW and processed in ACR 5.6 using defaults.
The X1 and the E-P2 side by side…

First the X1 shot. Click the image for larger 1400 pixel wide version:
and now the Olympus E-P2 with Kit Zoom version:
and the 100% crops
First the X1
and the corners:


So, what does this tell me? It tells me that the Oly E-P2 is pretty damn good for the money and the X1 has a bit more dynamic range, less noise, and also has the better lens. The X1 is sharp corner to corner and the E-P2 loses sharpness in the corners. Still, the E-P2 did great in this comparison IMO. The AF speed for this shot was about equal for both cameras. About a second, maybe less.
How about an ISO comparison in low light? Here is a quick grab of my wife at about 5am one morning. It was still dark out. We were in the car and I grabbed one with the X1 at ISO 3200 and one with the E-P2 at ISO 1600. The X1 at 3200 beats the E-P2 at 1600.

and some 100% crops…


As I shot the X1 more and more I was still REALLY digging it. I told the wife that we could sell her E-P2 if SHE wanted the X1! At this point she was not sure, as she did not shoot with it yet, but she was planning on it. We made a date to go out together and shoot some images with the X1 and E-P2.
Before we went out to shoot, I snapped this self portrait of myself in the bright light and thought it would be flat and harsh. While I do indeed look a bit harsh (due to my wrinkles that I somehow never noticed before), the X1 did amazingly well. The detail was superb (too much if you ask me, ha ha), and the DR was also great. Much better than the E-P2 could do in this situation with its kit zoom (I tried and it lacked the hyper detail, but a better lens would probably be closer).
“Winter Day Self Portrait” – Leica X1 at F2.8, ISO 100 – Silver Efex Pro and some CS4 tweaking
How about some full size samples?
So we took a drive and shot on a cold-ass winter’s day in Chicago. My hands were numb and the plan was for me to shoot the Olympus for the first part of the day and my wife the X1. After 30 minutes, she wanted her Oly back. She said it was more fun because she liked the EVF and it seemed quicker. Uh oh! She adored the X1’s style and look, but said it seemed less responsive than the E-P2. I have to agree. While the AF is about equal with the two cameras, for some reason, the E-P2 just feels quicker. Besides, she is not as obsessive as I am about image quality. She goes for fun factor and she preferred the E-P2.
But again, I will say it one more time…the X1 delivers the best IQ I have seen from any compact camera. It’s sharp corner to corner, has superb color, and you do indeed see the “Leica look” in many of the images. I have no complaints on the IQ, the feel, or the style.
Mina shooting her E-P2 - Leica X1 at F2.8 and ISO 100 straight from camera – Click here for beautiful full size out of camera image
F4 – ISO 640 – Straight From Camera – NO PP
F4 – ISO 320 – Straight From Camera - NO PP – Download FULL size JPEG HERE
“Chicago Theater” – Leica X1 at F2.8 – ISO 100 – Click here for full size to see the detail!
So, did I keep my order for one? After three weeks with the Leica X1 and the Olympus E-P2, we decided to NOT buy an X1, but this is because the E-P2/X1 was going to be my wife’s camera. She prefers the E-P2 for its looks, EVF, and art filters. I prefer the image quality and design of the X1, but what she says goes when it comes to “her” camera! Also, in reality, the E-P2 is more versatile with the ability to change lenses and add a macro, telephoto, or specialty lens. My heart was with the Leica, but my wife was thinking in reality. At almost $1000 less, the E-P2 would suit her needs just fine.
When it was all said and done and I was packaging up the X1 to send back to Leica, I knew I would miss it. To me, it was almost like having a miniature M8 with 24 Elmarit attached. Yes, the camera is slow. Even starting up can be slow, and after it powers on it seems like it wants to take a second or so before it will even AF at all. There were three occasions where I would turn off the camera and it would hang. The lens would not go back in. I had to turn it on and then off again. Powering down is also a slow-going affair. It’s just a slow camera and not something you would expect in a $2,000 camera in 2010, but even the $6000 M8 was full of quirks. That did not stop it from being one of the best photographic tools I have ever used.
Is the Leica X1 too expensive at $2,000? Well, when you compare it to an Olympus E-P2 setup maybe it is, but as I said, we are in Leica Land here and $2,000 for a Leica camera is pretty cheap when you look at their other offerings. M9 – $7000, S2 – $23,000, Noctilux 0.95 Lens – $10,000. I could go on and on. When looking at these prices, the X1 looks pretty cheap!
Here are my pros and cons of the Leica X1:
PROS:
- It is small and light, but beautiful. Most attractive compact on the market.
- The image quality is impressive and sets the standard for a smaller compact camera.
- The shutter is QUIET. No one will even know you took an image.
- High ISO is AMAZING and kills any and all compact cameras (that I have tried. I hear the Ricoh GXR is great at high ISO).
- 35Mm equivalent Elmarit lens is superb and being 2.8 is no problem with the high ISO capability of the X1.
- The color, auto-white balance, and exposure is superb.
- Comes with a FREE download of Lightroom.
- Small enough to truly take anywhere.
- Great out of camera JPEGs.
- The optional grip feels excellent on the camera and gives it a sturdier feel.
- The menu system is easy and simple to navigate and understand.
CONS:
- Camera slower to AF than newer cameras on the market.
- Battery life not the greatest. I was able to get about 200 shots per charge.
- Finish seems fragile, not meant for abuse or rough use.
- Dial move to easily and sometimes moved from their set positions. Leica needs to make the dials a bit more harder to move.
- Aperture and Shutter speed dials seem loose and easily move out of place. Should be firmer.
- More pricey than the m 4/3 cameras which are its main competition due to size.
- To some, no video will be a con. For me, no biggie.
- Write times are a bit slow and playing back images are slower than average (so is my M9)
- No way to lock exposure in any mode other than manual mode. I would like to see an Exposure Lock Button.
Here is another video showing the menu system of the X1 which is much like the M9:
THE ACCESSORIES
Leica has designed and released some cool accessories for the X1 camera. They sent me the grip and ever ready case and I really loved the grip. I highly recommend it to anyone buying an X1. I tried the case but it kept falling off as there was no way to fasten it to the camera when just using the bottom half. They did not sent me the Viewfinder so I did not test it. There is also a system case and a D-Lux 4 style case available.
MY FINAL THOUGHTS ON THE X1, AND WHAT SHOULD YOU BUY FOR YOUR COMPACT HIGH QUALITY NEEDS?
I have been writing this review for the past few days and really trying to figure out my true feelings on the X1. On one hand, I love it for everything that it is and that it stands for. High-quality images, simplicity, beautiful design, and a name you can feel great about. On the other hand, you have the excellent Micro 4/3 cameras like the Panasonic GF1 and Oly E-P1/E-P2 that are half the cost and not too far off quality wise (with a good lens). They are also fun to use and easy for beginners to shoot.
But when all is said and done, the X1 just has something about its quality that sticks with me and that I do not see in most of my E-P2 shots. The shine, the brilliance, the color, the detail. It’s all there in the X1. The few things that drag it down are the sluggish operation, the somewhat short battery life, and the finish even seems a little fragile to me. I would have preferred for Leica put manual controls on the lens, beefed up the finish, speed up the AF, and shoot it out the door for $2500. Still, I really enjoyed the X1 for what it is…a high-quality super compact that you can and will take anywhere and not have to worry about the quality of your image. I was never let down in that area.
Yes, it’s slow. Yes, I know I have said this about 10 times in this review. Yes, for $2000 it should be much faster and be somewhat speedy. Yet we all have to remember it is not a DSLR, but more like the old Leica CM film cameras which everyone raved about back in the day. Those were not speedy either, but the quality was there. The Leica name is known for high quality and the X1 sure as hell gives high-quality images. It’s just not a camera for shooting action, running kids, or anything where you really need to catch that decisive moment, unless you pre-focus and wait for it.
So, who would enjoy the X1? Simple. Those who want the highest quality compact on the market and do not need blazing AF. Hell, I shoot an M9 and it doesn’t even have AF, so somewhat slow AF doesn’t really bother ME much. I can deal with it as I am a slow-paced shooter. Others can not. If image quality is your #1 concern and you want a beautiful lightweight camera to be your daily companion, the X1 delivers the goods and in some cases can be the equal of the M8 and 24 Elmarit lens. I have a feeling I will be wanting this camera back after a couple of weeks without it. It gave me so many damn keepers in 3 short weeks and as I have already said, my heart is with Leica
If you are wanting a Leica x1, it is supposed to be available in January/Febuary of 2010. You can pre-order it at AMAZON or check it out at B&H Photo here. Also, one of my favorite Leica guys EVER, Mr. Ken Hansen only has 10 orders on his pre-order list. You can get on it by e-mailing him HERE. Tell him I sent you!!!
I thank you for reading this long review. I hope you enjoyed it and I hope it helps you to make a decision for your high-quality compact camera needs.
HELP SUPPORT THIS SITE TO KEEP IT GOING AND GROWING!
Remember, anytime you follow my links here and buy from B&H or AMAZON, this helps to keep my site going. If it was not for these links, there would be no way to fund this site, so I thank you in advance if you visit these links. I thank you more if you make a purchase as I get a tiny credit for ANY purchases made as a result of following my links! This helps me tremendously! Even if you are outside the USA, you can visit my worldwide Amazon links.
If you enjoyed this review, feel free to leave a comment at the bottom of this page and also be sure to join me on twitter or facebook! Also, you can subscribe to my feed at the upper right of any page and be notified of when new reviews are posted! You can also subscribe via E-mail (also to the right). Thanks so much for reading!
Here are a few more of my images from the Leica X1! Enjoy!
Leica x1 – ISO 800 – F2.8 – 1/30s
Related posts:








































Hi Steve,
Thanks for this great review of the X1! Also you’ve made some great pictures. What a great quality this camera has when shooting at high ISO and low-light situations.
What I miss is a comparisation photo with the Olympus E-P2 and/or Pana GF1 with 20mm lens.
Greetings,
Damiaan van Vliet,
The Netherlands.
Great review Steve, as usual ! Very exciting camera…
My question : would you give up your M9 for an X1 (if you forget about the Noctilux) ? For shooting 35mm equivalent, what does your heart say ? M9+35 Summicron or X1 ? I’m curious about your opinion…
Steve, thanks for your extensive real life review.
Looking at your images it’s indeed the image quality and ‘Leica look’ what this camera is all about.
For me it’s exactly like you concluded: for fast AF I’ll use my Nikon D200, for image quality (and not to forget portability) the X1.
Now I really can’t wait for my X1 to arrive.
Guys, be patient as my site crashed today when posting this review. I am working on a solution now. Thanks
Just testing…
Great job Steve, as usual! Would you please tell us more about the bokeh of this camera. Thanks!
Dear Mr. Huff.
I’ve just read your review of X1 and I’m very impressed with the picture quality.
Now it is the decision time for me – GF1 or X1????
Keep up your good work!
Bokeh seemed nice but it is a 2.8 lens so the X1 is not a bokeh machine like an M9 and 50 Lux. But I did not see any harsh bokeh in any of my images.
great review, i really enjoyed it… can’t wait to see your review on the pancake 20mm f1.7lens
First off great review Steve. I know how committed you have to be to write something (especially of this length). I’m sure I speak for everybody who reads your site when I say many, many thanks dude.
Secondly, I would agree with you about the auto focus. It’s slower than what’s expected of a modern digital camera, and one at $2K at that. But from the shots I’ve got so far, I’m very happy. I’m a ’street shooter’ but I’m a slow shooter and I’m still waiting for my first real annoyance of missing a shot due to auto focus issues (I’ll let you know when that day comes…LOL).
steve:
thanks for the review…. how is the macro on this beauty- is it as good/better than the d-lux4?
prk, AHHHH! I knew I forgot something! Really, there is no macro. It has a macro AF setting but its not a macro. Ill update the review now…
Hi Steve,
I take always a lot of pleasure to read your reviews from……France !
This one is, one more time, a great piece of job.
I really always like your pic’s and so it is with the X1.
You have well balanced, i think, the pros & cons of the X1.
Thank you, thank you, thank you !
Best wishes for 2010.
Jean-Paul
Great review as always, Thanks! Here in Finland we have -4 degrees F (-20 Celsius) but reading good reviews about great gear keeps me warm! This review made it even harder to choose from GF1, Lumix LX3, Leica D-Lux 4 and now this X1…
Steve:
A fun to read and very helpful review. Thank you!
One question. You suggest that the camera is not a good one for street shooting.
But I’d still like your take on this. The GF1, EP-2, X1 – is zone focusing any more effective on any of these? How difficult is it to set up each camera for instant shooting without auto focusing? It’s clear that for doing that with AF the GF1 still comes in first, but many of us also like to use zone focusing for that purpose.
Thanks.
Mark
Hey Mark,
Thanks for the comments. Zone focusing on the X1, GF1 or E-P2 is not easy and is probably easiest on the X1 of the three. The AF of the GF1 is fast enough for street, the E-P2 and X1 not really.
Great revue!
Another wonderful review Steve – I think what you do best with your reviews is capture the spirit and excitement of photography and why we love it so much! Inspiration work, and you always make me want to go out to the streets and start taking pictures for the love of it
Thanks so much for this, hopefully I’ll be able to put together a budget to get the X1. I have a plan to get a Leica M6 as well , so the X1 will compliment my dream Leica ’system’ nicely
Steve:
Thanks for the response.
Would it be too difficult for you to describe how zone focusing is done on the X1 given that you don’t have the camera right now? I’m just trying to get an idea of its feasibility. Sean Reid had indicated problems with setting up the camera for that type of shooting that he thought could be addressed by a firmware upgrade, but we still don’t know if Leica has attended to his feedback.
AF is not always the best way to do street shooting, so I’m not concerned bout the lack of AF speed in the X1, IF it can be set for effective zone focusing.
Mark
Thanks, Steve, I enjoyed a lot your real life review.
I’m going to buy the X1 and take the consequences of its horrible AF.
Just a question : do you think that a firmware update can mitigate this problem or not at all ?
Greetings,
josé
(from Spain)
thanks for the great review steve… keep up the excellent work!
Mark,
Zone focusing…you basically turn a focus wheel on the back and set your desired distance in feet. But its sort of rough and not accurate though with practice I can see one getting good at it.
Jose,
Not sure about a FW update making the AF faster but it is possible I guess. I haven not heard anything from Leica since the day they shipped me the X1 so not sure.
Damn you Steve!
I had just switched my mind from the X1 to the E-P2 and now you come up with this review and make me wonder about the X1 again… Ahhhh! What to do? What to do?…
Hey Frank,
Well, I didn’t buy an X1 and my wife liked the E-P2 better so maybe that helps? Seriously, the E-P2 is a great camera. Ill have the 20 1.7 tomorrow and will see how it does with the better glass. Ill post my thoughts tomorrow or Thursday. Thanks
Steve
Thanks for this GREAT review. Based on it, I believe the X1 is for me. I have a D-Lux 4 and I am quite happy with its AF performance. Apparently I should expect the same performance level, but with increased IQ and High ISO performance. Kind of a no brainer.
Thanks again Steve. Your review was really helpful for me.
Excellent review Steve! I am wondering if any of the speed issues could be solved by a software patch? Or is it 100% a hardware issue?
Patrick:
Sean Reid addressed that in his extensive review of the X1. He explains that while it might be improved via a firmware change, it is largely a hardware issue related to tradeoffs re other positive aspects of the camera. This relates to the fps rate limit of the sensor. So there is a hardware ceiling re the AF speed.
Mark
Patrick:
Sean Reid addressed that in his extensive review of the X1. He explains that while it might be improved via a firmware change, it is largely a hardware issue related to tradeoffs re other positive aspects of the camera. This relates to the fps rate limit of the excellent sensor. So there is a hardware ceiling re the AF speed.
Mark
Hey – nice review – I guess I’m one of those Leica lovers who’s already decided to get an X1 – it’s exactly what I’ve been looking for as a replacement for my D-Lux3 – if I could, I’d get an M9, but I just don’t have that kinda cash. Anyway, it’s perfect for the type of photography I’m into. Can’t wait for it to arrive in a couple of weeks.
Just wanted to point out something about your autofocus tests…
When you count, you start with 1, not zero. And it means that all the times you mention are all a second longer than it really takes.
e.g. when you count “1 Mississippi 2 Mississippi 3″ and then the autofocus kicks in, you say it’s taken 3 seconds. But you’re wrong – it’s taken 2. Your “1″ is actually zero… and you should have counted like this: “0 Mississippi 1 Mississippi 2″ – and voila – it takes 2 seconds, not 3.
Hope that makes sense.
Thanks for the review Steve . Very much confirming the other previews from people that really know something about photgraphy. (a.o Sean Reid)
One issue that I am missing in your review however is the way to make the X1 a real street Photography tool. In extend discussed with Sean in the LEICA FORUM and by Sean on his own website. ZONE FOCUSSING !
You mentioned it only very quickly but this issue is so important for many of us.
Ofcourse the wheel on the back with the limited scale on the screen are not what we will work with. Like you said this will take even more time to start up than any AF. The way to work with the X1 as a streeshooting gun is to (for example) set aperture to F11. AF to a point a approx. 2.5 metres. Switch with the dedicated button (below the dial on the back) to MF (press 2 times) and fire away in the highest speed possible from any distance from 1.4 metres to infinity. Just framing and shooting (shutter lag is improved since Sean got newest update) without the annoying lag of AF. Experiment with aperures and distances . Practice distance estimation and you will become a stealthy streetshooter with the X1. For more static pictures very fast AF is ofcourse fine but not essential. Those who want this kind of pocketable camera with big sensor AND fast AF will have to wait another few years due to technical hardware shortcomings at this moment of time.
Why wait if you can work you way around it ?
Have fun and shoot like hell !!
Hexar:
I think you and I may read Sean’s comments a little differently.
It seems to me that using the wheel to set distance is just a bit tricky and takes practice.
So it sounds like using the wheel to set distance and setting the aperture will set up zone focusing.
But I may also be misreading you.
Of course once I have the camera this will seem a bit less abstract!
Clearly, we have the same goal re using the camera and the same perspective re AF.
Mark
Thanks for a long and interesting review Steve.
The image quality seem awesome.
And I wonder if the slow AF could be handled in the same way as the Digilux 2 where one simply build in a rhythm of locking focus with the shutter half down, then shoot when green (thus no delay on the actual shot). It looks in the video as if you press the shutter fully and then it takes a second – and that delay is really annoying then. Plus you won’t know what will happen in the frame 1 second from you press. With pre-AF you lock the focus and can shoot without delay. Much more control and prediction.
In any case, I decided not to get the X1 long time ago – and you successfully made me reconsider that.
Hexar,
I think these are kind of silly workarounds and only necessary if you really want a Leica. This camera is $2K. You can have the EP2 with an M mount adapter, get yourself a clean 50mm Summitar with a REAL depth of field scale and you’d have still saved $500. Heck, you can put a Voigtlander 50mm Nokton 1.5 on the EP2 and you’d have a great setup. To use zone focus is not easy but certainly feasible with a real lens with a DOF scale on it. Trying to do it with an X1 just to justify having one, IMHO, does not make a lot sense. I believe that a camera should suit your needs and not the other way around. Why adapt to the shortcomings of a camera when you can have one that does want you want and need it to do?
Max has a point and is one of the reasons I wished Leica would have put a working manual lens on the camera. That would have made the X1 almost unbeatable in more than IQ. Thx for the comments guys. Still trying to get my site on the new server and up to speed.
Max:
I respectfully disagree.
Sean Reid actually indicates that zone focusing is even more of a pain with the GF1 and EP1. BTW, the 50mm on the EP2 would be the equivalent of a 100mm lens.
If learning to do zone focusing with the X1 just takes some practice then it’s just another case of learning to work with the limitations of a camera so that one can get all the other considerable payoffs. That’s par for the course.
Please note that I’m not knocking the Olympus or the GF1. They are both great cameras. I have the GF1 and for AF use it’s great. But the X1 offers other payoffs.
As far as why buy the X1…different strokes for different photographers.
I wouldn’t place a 50mm lens on the EP2 or GF1.
You wouldn’t want to have to mess with learning zone focusing on the X1, especially for $2000.
Both perspectives are fine.
Mark
Dear Max,
One of the main reasons for me to get a X1 is the 36 mm (film format) lens with the high IQ. So not a 100 mm output as you are proposing as an alternativ.
I would need a 17 or 18mm lens with the same IQ on a EP2. I can predict that the 17mm OLYMPUS lens on the EP2 does not even get close to the final result of the X1 with the 24mm LEICA lens. Any other 17 or 18mm lenses from the “old glass” would make your comparision more valid but I would not know anything near this that exists. The 20mm panasonic lens apart from being 3/4 on the EP1 ( instead of 2/3 format with LEICA) is just a tad too long for my liking.
That’s right, Steve. I certainly don’t need an X1 but frankly I would have probably bought one if it did have a working manual lens. I like the images, the portability, and the no frills Leica approach but $2K for a glorified point and shoot? Image (as in quality of the image) is certainly paramount but I think the Leica marketing geniuses are trying to tap into a rarified market who, they think, needs a “point and shoot” with high quality images who doesn’t mind paying for the name. By definition, most people who buy these types of cameras, gladly give up some image quality for fast autofocus and other gadgetry and, don’t want to spend $2K.
I still think the EP2 is the one to REALLY consider because even though picture quality is (marginally) inferior, the fact that you can use M mount lenses (albeit manual focus) makes a $1500-2000 investment MUCH more justifiable and in the end probably deliver better images (assuming that the person taking the picture understands that high tech gear has little to do with creating a great image, which makes this whole rant almost pointless
Ah thanks for the nice review, that comment was quite long and here is the new version: How many lenses does one need? One most of the time. Street shooting? I wish I was not so shy…lol… The time I take to gather the courage it takes to shoot at strangers is longer than any manual focus or slow AF. Sweet little cam, it will be between the 1 and GF1…
Max…and Hexar.
Max. Your last sentence was right on of course.
For the record. When I wrote to Sean Reid and asked him how difficult it was to zone focus with the X1 his response was “Very easy. reread the manual focus section (of his review) for details.” I’m sure it won’t be as easy for me! But it clearly is very doable.
I think the EP2 vs. X1 discussion really is in the apples and oranges category.
And I’d also be very happy to have someone bequeath me some M mount lenses to use with the GF1. I’m sure I’d find some use for a 21 or 24mm M lens!
Mark
Mark,
As we all know, no camera in today’s digital world is perfect and we all have choices to make based on one’s need, taste and budget. Your opinion is 100% valid and, as always, different strokes for different folks. After all, that’s how all these companies stay in business selling digital stuff to us crazy people. The perfect camera (as a simple tool to create images) was born in the ’50s with the M3 but those were the days of film. Different times…but some things never change.
Agreed Max….
But “crazy”? Who’s crazy?
And soon there’ll be a GF2 and an EP-3….and of course an X2. I’m going to go out now and take some shots of….anything…with my GF1…I mean…anything….just to stop obsessing.
Mark
Steve,
great review and great pictures! I love my E-P1 but after reading your review, i’m thinking about a X1.
Reiner
Thanks for the very interesting review of the X1, Steve.
Perhaps a vicious effect but I’m definitely sold on the Nik Silver Efex Pro software. I’ll buy it!
Go for it Mark…just don’t go out and buy an S2
Max,
I’m not really interested in the reasons that others have to buy a particular camera. If you say you prefer the EP-2, I wish you enjoy your camera. But judging which means the Leica logo or 2K for others is treading a slippery slope that has no relation to the photograph itself.
I can tell you that in my case is only the image quality, size and weight. I make long trips (sometimes several months) with very little baggage. For me, the motivation of the journey is the journey itself, not photography. So never charge with (even) a kilo of photographic material (in recent years, a rangefinder camera with a 35 mm). The issue is that occasionally I publish my photos (nothing glorious: just a small travel magazine). Moreover, I have been editor for many years, so, after seeing photographs of the review of the X1 and of the review of the EP-2, I would not say that the image quality of the EP-2 is just “marginally” inferior (of course, it would be prudent to wait to try it for myself or see more pictures of the X1).
If I understand correctly Steve, I, who mainly photographing static subjects, I make sure that (even fail 20% of my shots when the subjects are not as static), normally, I will have the option to publish my best photos (my main doubt is: is this camera strong enough?). With the EP-2 I’m not so sure. Apparently the replacement for the EP-2 will not be long in coming (43rumors). Perhaps the EP-3 gets me change my mind (if it arrives before I buy the X1). If not, I’ll have two new cameras.
For now, I’ll wait until Steve gets his 20 mm Panasonic and writes a new review.
Cheers,
José
(I hope you excuse my horrible English)
Hey Max….
I’m waiting for the S3…and just one person to come to a $50,000 a plate fund raiser for me.
Mark
Steve
an excellent review and just such pictures!
The reason, why I pre-ordered four months ago the small Leica, was the flash of the X1. I miss the flash at my current compact camera PEN + 17mm pancake. Is it possible to say something about its use? I would be delighted.
Thanks and greetings from Germany.
Hi Steve,
You really write reviews that pulls at my wallet. I feel I need to buy anything you review favorably. From what I see from your images, for me, the additional quality is really not worth the $1000 premium over the EP1/2.
Well, I think i will just save up for the pana 20mm pancake.
Keep up the good work.
yeongbing
Thanks guys!
The shot of the man on the phone with the bus behind him is among the best you have published. I went to B&H today and played with the EP-2 and GF1. Although I prefer the looks and image stabilization of the EP-2, the GF1 focus won me over. It is a shame that the X1 cannot compete with the Panasonic focusing. Perhaps Leica could barter a lens design for Panasonic’s focusing system?