Sony RX10 III: The Swiss Army Knife of Cameras
By Craig Litten
Back in my photojournalism days my colleagues and I used to dream of the perfect zoom lens, and all-in-one that would encompass every lens we’d ever need to carry. We’d joke with each other about wanting something to the effect of a 24 to 600mm f2.8, that way we’d have only one lens covering every focal length we’d ever need, and it would be with us at all times. This was long before the days of the 16mm zooms of today, so we didn’t dare dream “that big.” We knew full well though, that this was technically impossible and if it was even possible it would be a huge lens that you wouldn’t be able to carry around. But we dreamed anyway. This was back in the film days, you know, full frame 24 x 36mm, plastic gelatin acetate.
When digital first started to become mainstream (think: Sony Mavica or Minolta RD-175), being naive as I was back then, I never dreamed digital would overtake film, so I totally dismissed it. It was clunky, bulky and frankly, the cameras were ugly. Little did I know though, back when dreaming of the perfect zoom lens, that it would become a reality in the digital realm mainly because of digital sensor technology (with sensors much smaller than 24 x 36mm), and most likely, computer aided lens design.
ENTER THE SONY RX10 III
It is true, the lens on the RX10 III in not an f2.8, but who cares, fast lenses are much lens important today than they once were. Back when I was shooting film for a living, we basically had two choices of film: black & white with an ISO of 400 (Kodak Tri-X 400), and color slide film (chrome) which was ISO 100 (Fujichrome RDP100—a.k.a. Provia). Both could be pushed processed, but the more you pushed them, the worse they looked. ISO 400 slide film did exist, but it looked really bad and was very grainy. The RX10 III gives us 1/3 stop more light at the wide end of 24mm equivalent (from this point forward when I mention focal length, I’m referring to the RX10III’s equivalent focal length) than my “dream lens,” and one stop less at f4. But it’s worth mentioning that if you are shooting with a top-of-the-line Nikon or Canon 600mm super telephoto lens (I used the Canon version for many years), it’s an f4 also. But unlike the film days, the RX10 III has high ISO capabilities and can be shot up to ISO 12,800.
MAY MIRACLES NEVER CEASE
Let’s get down to the nitty-gritty: the crown jewel of this camera or the RX10 III’s “ace up it’s sleeve”, is its 24 to 600mm zoom lens. Plain and simple, if you are thinking about getting this camera, THIS is the reason to plunk down your cash. It’s simply stunning in every way. I really put the camera though it’s paces and tested the lens in every type of situation I could think of—even a real wedding, and this lens shines at every focal length which hopefully you’ll be able to see for yourself in the images samples. Plus, I included a lot of straight-out-of-camera, jpegs for you to view.
When the camera first arrived and I picked up the box, it was a lot heavier than I expected. I proceeded to open the box and removed the camera, and was a bit turned off by its size and weight at first. Make no mistake, it’s a bit on the large size. Even though I’ve seen pictures of it compared with other models, I was hoping that it was smaller. Just glancing at it sitting on my desk, it looks like any DSLR—a bit bloated-looking compared to Sony’s other sleek models. It’s also weighty and has some heft to it. It feels very solid though, and is extremely well made. I’d say it looks and feels like a smaller to mid-range DSLR; perhaps a Canon Rebel or a Nikon D5500 with a larger kit zoom lens attached—that would be my guess as I don’t own either of those models, but think it a pretty fair comparison. Although, the zoom on the RX10 III feels a bit fatter of larger in diameter and shorter (when collapsed) than most kits zooms that come with DSLRs. It’s not a problem though as the grip is almost perfect and very grippy.
So again, when I first picked up the camera it felt large and heavy to me as I’m used to shooting with my Sony a7-series cameras and prime lenses. But when I started using it, all of the negative feelings and trepidation disappeared, and I rarely thought of its size because of how incredibly well the camera handles and performs.
So to sum up my feelings about the size and weight: when compared to the performance of the camera and what it will do for you, size and weight are totally a non-issue and really won’t matter at all to most users.
DESIGN AND HANDLING
I’m only going to touch on a few things that I noticed while using the camera. The RX10 III is solid and extremely well made and well designed. If you’ve owned or used the preview RX10 models, it’s obvious the RX10III takes its design cues from the former models, but it’s a bit beefier.
The viewfinder is excellent. So good in fact that I never noticed it, and it felt as if I were shooting with my a7s, a7R or a7 II. The viewfinder is better than that of the a6000.
The grip is excellent too. It’s big, beefy and rubbery and instills total confidence when shooting with the camera even if you choose not to use a strap. The on/off switch and zoom rocker, as well as the shutter button, fall right under your index finger as they should. The “Movie” button is well placed and within easy reach of your thumb (much improved over the a6000/6300 and a7 models) as well as the rear horizontal dial. The rear grip also protrudes from the body slightly and has a good rubbery surface on it too, making the grip near-perfect for most hands.
I personally don’t care too much for the aperture ring. In concept it’s a great feature, but since none of my other lenses have an aperture ring, I find it hard to get used to. At one point, shooting in manual mode I was trying to change the aperture and had forgotten about the physical dial, and was looking for a way to change it through the menus. Of course, if this was your only camera using it would become second nature.
The main problem with the aperture ring though, which Sony should fix in the RX10 IV, is that it does not extend all the way around the lens, but only on either side of the lens. I found this puzzling and it made the ring hard to turn as I kept reaching under the lens with my left index finger finding nothing. And when I found nothing, I’d reach farther under the lens to the right side and inadvertently trip the “Click On/Off” switch which turns off the aperture’s clicking noise for video shooters. The “Click On/Off” switch is poorly placed in my opinion as this is a feature that is secondary (compared to the aperture ring itself) and won’t be used that often. You’ll either have it on or off. Simply extending the aperture ring all the way around the lens barrel would solve both problems. I do suggest that Sony would make the “Click On/Off” switch a bit stiffer though.
The lens barrel is fantastic and has the same feel as all of the other Sony E-Mount lenses—ribbed metal. The way the zoom ring electronically zooms the lens in smooth, tiny increments is wonderful, and I found it very useful and precise in the field. Personally, I prefer using the zoom ring over the rocker switch, but I’m glad Sony included both. This is how I’d sum it up: with the zoom ring you have precise control over zooming for exact framing, with the rocker switch, you get speed. It’s the best of both worlds. Of course, turning the zoom ring faster or harder, will allow you to zoom faster. It’s remarkable really.
The only negative thing about the lens barrel is found under the lens itself between the rear zoom ring and front the focus ring, which is a small hard plastic nub that sticks out. I assume it’s there so that you can “feel” the difference between the two rings (the zoom ring and the focus ring), but I don’t like it as it hurts my finger.
It’s worth noting that when you turn the camera on, the lens extends to nearly double its off position length, to its default position of 24mm. So the camera is not as “compact” as it appears in the advertisement pictures.
The built-in flash doesn’t extend up high enough, and at 24mm the lens hood will cast a shadow on the scene. It’s a easy fix though, simply remove your lens hood (or replace it with a third party screw-in metal lens hood like I do on all my lenses). The shadow disappears somewhere around 40mm.
The worst part though is that the flash doesn’t pull back for bounce flash. This is nearly unforgivable since it seems like a very easy fix, and can make all the difference in the world for more natural-looking flash pictures without having to tote an external flash.
Memory Card Door
The memory card door is a very tight fit, and it’s difficult to remove the SD card. It’s not a deal-breaker, but worth mentioning. However, I do like that it’s placed on the side and separate from the battery.
The RX10 III takes the same battery as all the NEX models, the a5000/5100, a6000/6300 and all the a7 models, the Sony FW50. To me, this is a wonderful thing because many who buy this camera will already own this battery. This means one battery and one battery charger for all of your cameras, and when traveling, every bit of space counts. It’s also a wonderful convenience for those pros who will purchase this camera as back-up to their existing Sony gear. Personally, I love the FW50 as it’s small, light and relatively inexpensive and good enough. Do I wish Sony would release an updated FW50II battery with more power? Yes!
While heavily using the camera, I didn’t notice the battery at all. What I mean is, battery life never surprised me or slowed me down, and felt similar to all my other Sony cameras. I would say that for most users having one back-up battery would suffice. I never burned through two full batteries in a day, and I’m a fairly heavy user. I don’t think that this is a worry for most users. If you’re a videographer and shoot all day, every day, you’ll have to do your own testing. When I do paid commercial shoots with my a7 cameras (three bodies plus an a6000), I carry a dozen Sony FW50 batteries with me. Most of the time, I’m on my third battery (per camera) by the end of the shooting day, but never use it up.
I use the tiny Think Tank Photo SD and Battery Wallet to carry a spare Sony FW50 battery and an extra SD memory card. They’re small, well made and cheap at $10. This would be all you need to go with your RX10III.
I’m glad Sony added a physical AF/MF switch. The more physical, customizable features a camera has, the better, and this camera is stacked. But I’m don’t read directions and remember searching through the menus to change from single AF to continuous AF and couldn’t find it as I’d forgotten about the front manual switch. Again, if you purchase this camera and own it using it regularly, it would never be a problem. Although, that being said, I did bump it from Single AF to Continuous AF a few times. The switch could be stiffer in my opinion.
Focus Hold Button
Like on the pro Sony G Master FE 24-70 f2.8 lens, Sony has included a “Focus Hold” button on the left side of the lens/body. A wonderful feature as the button is programable, like most of the buttons on any Sony cameras, and can be set exactly as you’d like to 56 different functions. Ah, control!
Buttons and Menus
One of the features I really love about Sony cameras is their amazing consistency from camera to camera with button layout and menus. I don’t mean just between their higher-end models like the a7 II, a7s II, a7r II, but between all of their models down to the super tiny Sony HX 90V. This floors me and at the same time, delights me. No other camera maker does this to this level, and it makes it so easy to transition between models while shooting with a variety of cameras for different purposes. This won’t affect most users, but if you owned say an a7 II, an a6300 an RX10 III and an HX 90V, you can set them up virtually the same way, and most of the buttons are in same place with only slight variations. This makes shooting different models a pleasure, and it is very practical.
If you’ve used any Sony camera from the HX 90V to the a7r II, you’re already familiar with the Sony menu system. Personally, I like them a lot. It is true that they could be categorized better (and there are blog posts our there that have gone into great detail concerning this), but they are vast and deep with nearly unlimited customization options, and the RX10 III is no exception. Actually, the menus on this camera are much deeper and offer features that my first generation a7 cameras don’t, as well as more advanced focus modes.
Lastly, in my opinion, Sony could improve the the RX10 III by adding a front dial that goes directly under the shutter button at the top of the grip (like on a7II models), and allow the aperture ring to lock into place for “Auto”. This way you can choose to use the horizontal front and rear dials for aperture and shutter speed if you wanted to. Or, it could be there for another function of your choosing.
Turning the Camera On
Just noting the obvious here, and somewhat reiterating what I stated above, but each and every time you turn the camera on, the lens defaults to it’s widest setting of 24mm. The only disadvantage I can think of here is that if you’ve turned it off (or let it go to sleep), and see a shot far away requiring the telephoto end of the lens, you’re likely to miss the shot as you may not have time to zoom in.
The lens also retracts when going into “sleep” mode which is a nice feature as it makes the camera more compact. When waking up from sleep mode (by tapping the shutter button), the lens again goes into its default 24mm setting by zooming out, effectively doubling the length of the lens.
THE WONDERS OF A 24-600mm LENS
As I stated earlier, the lens is where this camera really shines. Not only is it an amazing focal range, it’s technically excellent, dare I say, at every focal length. This lens is the crown jewel of the RX10 III and the first reason you’d purchase this camera. The second reason could be because of it’s excellent video capabilities inducing amazing slo-mo and 4K, plus external mic jack and a headphone jack.
Carrying an all-in-one camera body and lens with this staggering range cannot be understated. I’ve shoot for many years being forced to carry a variety of lenses to cover my needs. The industry standard is the 24-70mm and the 70-200mm. On top of that, many purchase a 300mm plus a 1.4x teleconverter. This still only gets you up to 420mm on a full frame camera, and if you include an APS-C camera in the mix, you’ll finally get past the 600mm mark but you’ll now have to tote two camera bodies, three lenses plus a teleconverter—hardly practical. And on top of that, if your 300mm is an f4, with the teleconverter you’ll now be at f5.6. If it’s an f2.8, the weight itself will kill you first. My good friend Neil from beautiful Leeds, England said he may be up to purchasing the RX10 III after reading this review, as he’s struggling with this very situation. A large DSLR, a kit of 3-4 lenses and a bad back.
Looking at another scenario, the only lens I could find that comes close in size, cost (plus camera body) and focal length is a Tamron 16mm-300mm (essentially a 25.6 to 480mm on Canon), but it doesn’t even zoom to 500mm, and is well over a stop slower at f6.3. True, you’ll have a larger sensor (APS-C vs 1”), but this Sony 1” sensor is so good that most will never care.
I had a blast shooting with this camera! Being able to go from wide angle, getting the entire scene in, and then zoom to anything I saw off in the distance was amazing and such fun—even with all of my years of shooting. When shooting an amateur surfer one day, I was actually able to sit under the shade of the fishing pier casually leaning against it, and still had enough zoom range on my lens to shoot tight, close-up photos.
Normally when shooting telephoto images you can’t shoot anything close to you without switching lenses. Not true with the RX10III, a simple flick of the zoom rocker or a turn of the lens barrel, and boom, you can shoot anything, anywhere, anytime—even macro. It’s incredibly liberating.
The macro capability of the lens is staggering for such a focal length. At the widest setting, 24mm, you can actually place the lens hood directly onto/against the subject you’re shooting. Of course 24mm, wide-angle macro isn’t ideal, the close-up abilities of the lens are still very good at other focal lengths.
WHO IS THE RX10 III FOR?
This camera has very wide appeal. I’d say across the board from the mom or dad who wants better photos of their children’s events, to the professional and just about everyone in-between. Personally, I would never had considered buying this camera until I got it in my hands and started shooting with it. If after reading this you’re still not sure, try renting it. Lens Rentals, which I believe is one of Steve’s sponsors and where he gets his gear from time to time, has it for under $66 (plus shipping) for three days—plenty of time to know if it’s for you or not. I have personally rented from Lens Rentals for years and it’s easy and safe.
I would call this the perfect travel camera. If you don’t mind the size, it packs everything you would need for travel. Add a small bag and a spare battery and you’re in business. The sensor is fantastic even up to ISO 3200 (for most) and even ISO 6400 for some who don’t mind the film-like grain. ISO 12800 is unusable in my opinion as it shows banding, something I’ve never seen in a Sony sensor personally.
Imagine traveling to Paris and shooting the Eiffel Tower from far away, getting the entire city-cape in one shot, and a filling the frame with the next shot. Or going on African safari and being able to zoom all the way in to get a close-up of a mother lion and her cub. This camera can do it and you’ll bring back high-quality, farmable images.
I’m not a videographer and cannot comment with depth about the video features of this camera, but that information is easy to find. But I’m also not blind. From my simple testing, the image quality amazed me with its depth, sharpness and clarity straight out of camera—which is what many want, but it also has advanced file formats and image profiles, dual recording, audio levels, focus peaking and variable frame rates all the way up to 240fps not to mention 4K, that will interest the professional for perhaps a B-roll camera. This camera would also likely appeal to an all-in-one video journalist on a budget, who could add an external mic, headphones, monitor, LED lighting, etc., and have the zoom range to cover any news scene.
The slow motion video that this cameras produces is unbelievable and loads of fun. There is nothing cooler than slo-mo, and everyone loves it. Simply turn the mode dial to HFR (I’m assuming it means High Frame Rate), hit the center button to place the camera on Standby, then press the Record button when you’re ready. The Image Stabilization in this camera is so good that some of the slow motion shots I took appear to be on a tripod—even at 600mm. I don’t think I’ll ever tire of 240 fps, but it even shoots 480 fps (which is pretty good quality) and even 960 fps where the images starts to really fall apart.
The Professional Photographer
If I were still working as a photojournalist, I’d have one of these in my bag, no question about it. Most of today’s news in on the Web, which is different from back when I started my career and everything was print-based. So large images sensors are not needed anymore for most things. Yes, they have their place and you need the super DSLRs like the Canon 1DxII and the Nikon D5 to capture many fast-moving sports events and news, but a camera like the RX10III has its place and shouldn’t be overlooked. Plus the image quality produced by this camera far exceeds the early digital cameras which were “good enough” for news and sports where image quality is secondary to getting the shot and telling the story. In fact, photojournalism is never about the image quality, bokeh or pretty pictures.
One scenario I can think of that I’ve covered in the past was the London Symphony Orchestra, where a camera’s shutter noise was equivalent to the death penalty. I was forced to stand on the very back wall with a sound blimp on my camera, hold my breath and dare not shoot when things got quiet. With a camera like the RX10 III and it’s silent shutter and incredible zoom range, I’d be able to roam around and shoot from anywhere in an event like the LSO.
Another scenario would be shooting pro golf at the putting green, where clicking a loud shutter too early could get you killed on the spot, and then kicked out. The amazing zoom range would come in handy because there are times when the golfer is right up to the edge of the ropes, where you’re seated, and times when the golfer is on the far side of the green. With this camera in hand, it would present no problem at all, and with 14 frames per second shooting, you’ll be able to easily get the entire sequence should the golfer have a great reaction. You can also send images via Wi-Fi right from the course to the picture desk. Amazing.
The Wedding Photographer
Can you shoot a real, live wedding with the Sony RX10 III? Yep, I do think that this camera has good enough image quality, fast enough focus, and the incredible zoom range to pull of a documentary-style or photojournalistic-style wedding. In fact, I was curious about this very thing after using the camera for a week or so, so I decided to do just that, shoot a real wedding.
What I love most about its image sensor, is that at ISO 3200, it has a nice grain pattern and look—almost like film grain with a digital touch. No, it’s not film, as it’s cleaner and sharper, but I think the high ISO look of this sensor is beautiful, and I thoroughly enjoyed using a single camera, and nothing else, while shooting a wedding.
Do I recommend using it for a wedding? Why not? I don’t think it would suffice for those who shoot smoother, slicker images, but I’m a photojournalist, and I’m more interested in capturing life’s moments and emotion than slick imagery. This camera can do that without much problem. If you go back a decade or so when “wedding photojournalists” were still shooting film (some of this images are still out there on the Web), you’ll see that at higher ISOs the RX10 III competes pretty well. Sure it suffers from the lack of super shallow depth of field, etc., but the point I’m trying to make is that this camera is very special and incredibly flexible to do all that it can do.
The only hesitation I’d have is that in really low light, the focus can hunt some. But I don’t think it’s any worse than my a7r. Plus this can be overcome by preparing for it and shooting the necessary amount of images. I think in the right hands, there isn’t much you couldn’t do with this camera.
The Everyday Photographer
Finally, I think this camera would fit the needs of the everyday shooter who wants a really good, versatile camera to shoot his/her family, vacations, school events, life events like weddings, etc., and even for their own creative hobby of photography. I’d say consider the options, the pros and cons and go for it. I think you’ll be very satisfied. This is a camera that you can sit in the last row with, or stand at the back wall, during your child’s play and still capture great images. Soccer games or sports? I think with practice and 14 fps (frames per second), you’ll get the images you want from anywhere on the field. I did test the continuous focusing ability and was able to shoot the erratic sport of surfing without much problem. And the AF during video easily tracked boats coming in and out of the inlet. Is it a speed demon like the a6300? No, but it’s probably on par to the older a7-series camera bodies. And believe it or not, I shot surfing one day with my a7r just to see if it could do it. It did.
How do I sum up such a camera as this? I’m already at 4600 words, and could probably double that as there is just so much that this camera does, and so much to say about it. It literally is the Swiss Army Knife of cameras, the jack-of-all-trades and has everything including the kitchen sink. There are just so many uses for it, and in my opinion, it’s a great photographic tool to add to your tool box. For some it will be their main camera, for others, a back up, and still for others, a tool for specific jobs. The best part of the RX10 III, in my opinion, is it’s lens. The focal length is staggering, and the lens quality is exceedingly good. And, because of its range, it’s a lot of fun to shoot with. I think just about everyone reading this post got into photography because it is fun. And this camera opens up all kinds of avenues to explore if you ever get tired of zooming out to 600mm (I doubt you ever will). Incredible still shooting frame rate of 14 fps, excellent macro capability—especially at 24mm, surprisingly nice bokeh where the image transitions from sharp focus to blur, 4K video and slow motion video, and the list goes on, all in a single, well made, well designed all-in-one package. What’s not to love?
NEXT MODEL WISHES
- Flash that pulls back for bounce
- Aperture Ring that goes all the way around the lens
- Built-in Neutral Density Filter (like previous model)
- Front Dial under shutter button
- Hybrid Auto Focus (similar to the a6300)
“To hold it is not to love it; to use it is to love it.”
SUPER FUN, HIGHLY RECOMMENDED! BUY IT at AMAZON HERE!
HELP KEEP THIS FREE WEBSITE RUNNING STRONG! HOW YOU CAN HELP OUT!
For the past 8 years I have been running this website and it has grown to beyond my wildest dreams. Running this site costs quite a bit of cash every single month and on top of that, I work full-time 60+ hours a week on it each and every single day of the week. Because of this, I could use YOUR help to cover my costs for this free information that is provided on a daily basis.
To help out it is simple, and no, I am not asking you for a penny!!
If you ever decide to make a purchase from B&H Photo or Amazon, for ANYTHING, even diapers..you can help me without spending a penny to do so. If you use my links to make your purchase (when you click a link here and it takes you to B&H or Amazon, that is using my links as once there you can buy anything and I will get a teeny small credit) you will in turn be helping this site to keep on going and keep on growing.
Not only do I spend money on fast hosting but I also spend it on cameras to buy to review, lenses to review, bags to review, gas and travel, and a slew of other things. You would be amazed at what it costs me just to maintain this website, in money and time (250 hours a month, and about $3000 per month).
So all I ask is that if you find the free info on this website useful AND you ever need to make a purchase at B&H Photo or Amazon, just use the links below. You can even bookmark the Amazon link (not the B&H) and use it anytime you buy something. It costs you nothing extra but will provide me and this site with a dollar or two to keep on trucking along.
AMAZON LINK (you can bookmark this one)
B&H PHOTO LINK – (not bookmark able) Can also use my search bar on the right side or links within reviews, anytime.
Outside of the USA? Use my worldwide Amazon links HERE!
You can also follow me on Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube. 😉
One other way to help is by donation. If you want to donate to this site, any amount you choose, even $5, you can do so using the paypal link HERE and enter in your donation amount. All donations help to keep this site going and growing! I do not charge any member fees nor do I (nor will I ever) charge for reviews, so your donations go a long way to keeping this site loaded with useful content. If you choose to help out, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. It is TRULY needed and welcome. Thank you!
This year I travelled with a D800+50/1.4 and a RX10m1. My best pictures were all with the D800 and 50/1.4
Depth of field and therefor more 3d pop
Details at 100% cause of better lense
Dynamic Range in postprocessing
Main advantage of the RX10 was the ability to charge the battery with usb and ofcourse flexibility in focal range.
Gosh, such a wonderful review! Thanks! I’ve been noticing on other photography sites, the reviews of this camera and have been rather amazed at the positive response to this camera. Your review clears up why this camera is thought of so positively. HOWEVER, I still have the same question that no one appears to ask: Why such a small sensor in such a ‘big’ camera? In order to have that large zoom range must the sensor be only 1″? I’d think an APS-C, combined with all of the existing features, would be even more fabulous. How come no one even asks the question on any of the sites? Obviously, I’m missing something.
probably need the space because the lens is recessed into the body and also probably because the RX10 series is geared towards video and the extra space helps with the heating.
Hi AT, yes, the camera is very large for it’s sensor size, but so is the GH4. I suspect it’s because that’s what Sony wanted, but also, to fit that amazing lens inside. I do wish it was a bit smaller, but like I said in the review, when you see what it can do, you won’t care and you’ll forget about it’s size. Thanks and cheers.
With an APS-C size sensor you’d need a 400mm lens to get the equivalent 600mm point of view. I have a 70-400mm zoom and I can tell you it is HUGE! It alone weighs more than this camera and lens combination.
This is why this particular camera and lens combination is so large for this 1 inch sensor size.
thank you so much for this great review!
I´m going to Africa for Safari in two month having an A 7 R ii and a A 6000 with 4/70-200. Actually, I wanted to buy a Nikon 200 – 500 or a Sigma 150-600 S. But I´m not sure about the different adapters working well (Commlite and Sigma Mc 11).
After reading your review I`m even more insecure about the planned purchase and think about buying an RX 10 iii instead…
What do you think!
How big can you print out of the RX 10 iii?
Best regards from Germany, Henrike
Here’s what Imaging Resource said about print quality of the RX10ii. The RX10iii should be the same.
High-quality prints up to 24 x 36 inches at ISO 64-100; Nice 11 x 14 inch prints at ISO 1600; and 4 x 6 inch prints just pass the mark at ISO 12,800.
ISO 64/100 prints show impressive detail and pleasing colors all the way up to 24 x 36 inches. Even with larger 30 x 40 prints, there is very little visible pixelation from this 20-megapixel image, making this size just fine for wall display.
ISO 200 images show a hint of shadow noise, but detail and colors are otherwise excellent, making for a great 20 x 30 inch print. We’d be fine with a 24 x 36 print for wall display here, too.
ISO 400 prints, despite the increase in sensitivity, look strikingly similar to ISO 200, in terms of noise level and detail. We’re happy to call 20 x 30 inch prints good here too. Our tricky red fabric swatch does appear slightly less detailed here than at the previous ISO, but detail elsewhere in the print at this size looks great.
ISO 800 images start to show noticeably stronger noise, and a 16 x 20 inch print is on the cusp of being considered acceptable. We’re more comfortable, however, calling it at 13 x 19 inches, with the next higher print size used only for less critical applications.
ISO 1600 prints still display nice, pleasing colors, but noise is certainly becoming an issue and impacting fine detail, therefore making 11 x 14 inch prints the largest size we’re calling at this sensitivity.
ISO 3200 images display both higher noise as well as slightly blander-looking colors. Detail is still high enough for an acceptable 8 x 10 inch print, though.
ISO 6400 prints show a lot of softening due to noise and noise reduction processing, but we’re still pleased with a 5 x 7 inch print at this ISO level.
ISO 12,800 images max-out at 4 x 6 inches. Any larger and the lack of detail due to noise makes for a disappointing print.
Summary: The Sony RX10 II maintains the same 20-megapixel resolution as its predecessor and the print sizes are more or less similar — which is to say very good for a 1-inch sensor camera. As with its RX100 IV sibling, the RX10 II’s big upgrades are centered around the new 1″-type Exmor RS stacked CMOS sensor, which offers improvements to performance rather than image quality. If you’re debating between this model and its predecessor, the still image quality difference is not a major factor in terms of available print sizes.”
Thank you so much for this information, Derek!
Thanks for writing. I have much confidence, from first hand experience, that the RX10 III would be a fantastic choice for safari. Please feel free to do a TEST print of any of my full size samples to get a feel for just how large you’re comfortable printing. I think Derek’s information above is very helpful, and much better than any advice I can give as Imaging Resource actually did extensive testing.
I”ve been trying a little astrophotography but have been unsuccessful at setting the focus to infinity on the RX10III; the focus assist claims to have set it but, alas, infinity isn’t infinity on this camera. Am I missing something?
As much as I’d like to help David, astrophotography is something I haven’t tried. As for focusing to infinity, your findings could be true. Have you tried the DP Review forums? Sorry I couldn’t help.
You can’t set any camera to infinity focus to do astrophotography. You have to use manual focus mode to manually focus the lens. I plan to use my rx10 iii to video the total solar eclipse in 2017, which will require manual focusing and manual exposure control.
I have tried manually focusing on infinity but w/o success; I set the switch on the front of the camera to MF and then used the on screen guide to move the indicator toward infinity as I slowly rotate the front focus ring, but, alas every photo of the night sky is out of focus. I tried variations incl. just before infinity, right on and ‘past’ infinity — all give the same out-of-focus result. It’s as if I missing a setting– but what?
You must focus on the subject, not some elusive “infinity” marker, which, even if you get on it, won’t guarantee your subject is in focus!
Well, if the subject is a constellation or the Milky Way, you have no way to focus on the subject as you’ll see no light in your viewfinder/LCD screen. The only way I know how to fool the camera in this situation is to (a) turn on autofocus, (b) have the camera focus on a light source about 50+ yards away, (c) change back to manual focus, and (d) take the picture. That’s a “tried and true” method that’s been around for sometime to achieve infinity focus absent a lens marking. By the by, when shooting stars with a Sony a6300 with a lens absent an infinity mark, the similar display provided does work when you use manual focus — i.e., infinity is infinity on that Sony camera. So did no one test the RX10III?! Why provide a non-functional infinity mark?
I’m no expert but surely if you focus on the moon, everything else up there will be in focus. But then again I might be completely wrong.
Your are correct, however, most astrophotograhers who shoot the stars and the Milky Way prefer darker skies absent any moonlight.
Thank you for this review – and honestly, I could have read another 4,000 words, no problem. 🙂 I always appreciate detailed reviews of cameras I like (or want) by passionate photographers who use them. I think in some ways you’ve out-Steved Steve himself!
You raise some excellent technical points. Why have a digital camera that’s… just as big and bulky as a 35mm camera? I don’t get it. The whole point of digital is that you can have smaller sensors (witness how good the Fuji sensors are – way better than FF Nikon in many ways). The 1″ sensor is obviously not going to beat a 36x24mm sensor, but for the uses you described, who cares?
I think eventually you’ll see more and more photographers shooting with this camera. Maybe not the football or Formula One, but everything else. Canon, Nikon, and even Sony will hurt because they won’t be able to sell f***ing expensive and huge telephone lenses anymore. Commercial photographers will of course spend serious money on, say, the SL, A7r or the new Hasselblad X1D and so on. That’s a different market, and I’ve done a little bit of that kind of work with the A7 (which allows the use of a shift lens, etc.).
I think that many photographers will continue to use DSLRs for journalism because they want to look ‘professional’. I can’t blame them, but at least they are aware of choices. Not my problem, not my money.
Me, I still use an NEX body with an adapted SLR lens. There are so many options these days. I even thought about using a Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera for photography, despite its 2K resolution. This Sony is once again challenging my preferences.
BTW I don’t like the JPEG compression, on these images, but the sharpness of this camera is very, very evident.
P.S. I really like film and I have to admit that if I want to shoot film again, I’ll need to shoot at least 4-perf 35mm, which makes for compact cameras like the Olympus Pen. But even those are nowhere as convenient as the RX10III.
Lots of good points, thank very much Karim!
Excellent review mate. Best I’ve read so far.
I’ve passed the link on the Sony UK PR and Marketing department who I’m often in contact with.
I’m getting one too – can’t wait. I already have the RX100 so this will compliment it just fine.
UK consumer journalist
Thanks so much Derek! You’ll love it.
Obviously the work of a VERY capable photographer. Thanks for the review and the awesome examples. There’s something about the look of a high quality small sensor in the hands of a good shooter. It has an edge to it, its not better or worse than full frame, just unique and enjoyable to my eyes. These shots definitely have it!
Thanks so much JO, I too love the look of the small sensor.
Very impressive. I have the Nikon V1 and 1 series 70-300 which goes to 810mm. Its a great lens but would love to know how it compares to this.
Hi John, good question! You may know that I was a huge fan of that camera and wrote a few reviews using it here on Steve’s site. I never got to test the 70-300 but loved the idea of it, and I’m sure it’s fantastic. I thought the V1 sensor pretty good for its time, but I think the sensor in the RX10 III surpasses it a bit–Sony just makes amazing sensors. The RX10 III would compliment your Nikon 1 system quite nicely. 😉
I believe the small plastic nub is there so that the camera can rest on a flat surface without actually leaning on or scratching the lens barrel.
Thanks Lewis, could be.
I’ve had the RX10 mk3 about 3 weeks and it is a blast to shoot. I got shots that I probably would not have gotten with my A7R2 and a bag full of lenses and one at 600mm got about as many likes as I’ve ever gotten on Facebook. At low ISO and good light you can get very sharp and detailed images at any focal length that few would guess came from a 1 inch sensor. It does pretty well at higher ISO’s as well.
It has some weaknesses, but for me, they are not fatal flaws by any means.
– Autofocus on small birds at 600mm can be challenging and trying to manual focus while hand holding steadily is not easy. Bigger targets have not been a problem.
– Dynamic range is not nearly as good as the A7R2. I learned to use exposure compensation to protect the highlights in bright high contrast scenes so it has turned out not to be a problem.
– Startup is sluggish so I often just leave the camera on while in potential shooting situations. Battery life has been better than expected but a spare to two is always a good idea even though I have not had to use a spate even in a full day of shooting.
This is a fun and competent camera with a huge focal range that provides an all in one-package solution. It cannot match the the sheer image quality of a Batis prime on an A7R2 but most photographs of vacations, friends, and family don’t need to be at that level to be compelling. I’m not giving up my A7R2 but I’m not giving up my RX10 mk3 either!
Great review! 😉
Thankyou Craig for this review. I have an RX10 and have been disappointed with the ease with which it blows highlights. Otherwise I find it great to hold and use. Has the RX10III improved in relation to highlights? At the moment I am often torn between the Sony and my older Leica V-lux 1 with 35-400 zoom. (And am at the same time learning to get out of zooming and shoot prime!)
Hi John, Thanks so much for reading. I’ve read that the image sensor in the RX10 III is the same as in version II, but I don’t know if it’s different than version I, perhaps someone else can answer that. I live in very bright, contrasty South Florida, and shot in all kinds of light and didn’t have any problems with exposure or highlights blowing out. I do use exposure compensation regularly but found the RX10 III’s sensor handled similarly to all my other Sony’s. The only time I did experience highlights blowing out a little was during slow motion video (240fps and above).
Thanks for replying, Craig. And thanks for generating this discussion – will be very useful in my longer-term decision making. And those crocodile teeth at 600mm – full screen and further zoomed in! – are about the most convincing argument anyone could want.
Good call on the croc, most think it’s a gator. Those teeth are sharp, in more ways than one 😉
I set the “Zebras” for 100%, and then dial down the exposure until they go away. The result is perfect highlights. Thanks to Kirk Tuck for this tip.
Thanks very much. Kirk is awesome!
Very nice review of a great camera. I have had mine for a few weeks, and am very impressed. I took it to a dance presentation at a quarry, and was so happy to have the great reach, as a lot of the action was quite distant. You can see the range in some of these shots. I find the small sensor is fine, as long as the light is good. When I shoot indoors, at a jazz club, for instance, the noise is bad, and the focus hunts. For everything but very low light, it’s great.
Thanks for reading. You certainly benefited from the RX10 III’s reach for what you were covering, as it seemed like the perfect camera.