A Sony RX1R Mark II Camera Review in Iceland by Chad Wadsworth

Iceland Web-016

A Sony RX1R Mark II Camera Review, in Iceland

by Chad Wadsworth – His site is HERE

In 1988, The Sugarcubes debut album “Life’s Too Good” was getting heavy rotation in my cd player and served as an introduction to the quirky band’s native Iceland. Over the years other Icelandic bands like Sigur Ros and Of Monsters and Men, continued to sonically and lyrically paint an enticing canvas of their native homeland, further cementing the small country on my bucket list of places to visit. So this fall, while friends planned their winter vacation to warmer climes, I pitched the family on an adventure in the land of Ice and Fire. My wife has come to accept my odd predilections and the kids were just happy to get passports so we booked the flights and began our planning.

Anxious to capture the beauty of Iceland, I still had to be realistic about the nature of the trip. This was a family vacation, not a photo tour or workshop so I had to pack light and work quickly. Luckily, a friend was in possession of a loaner Sony RX1RII from B&H Photo and offered it up for use during the trip. This friend is building some impressive 3D printed Arca Plate compatible grips for compact cameras that add almost zero weight. Check them out HERE. – highly recommended.

With the RX1RII secured, I committed to use it for the majority of vacation shooting (everything presented here was shot with it unless otherwise captioned). Some may question why use a camera with only a fixed 35mm focal length but not everyone wants to play the roll of conspicuous tourist sporting a DSLR and zoom lens. On the contrary, the RX1RII embodies the classic concept of a decisive moment camera, similar to film compacts like the Konica Hexar AF that enabled pros to pack a much smaller kit when traveling, without sacrificing quality. The a7RII along with the Zeiss Touit 12mm and a Leica Summitar 50/2 also made it into the travel bag, but the primary test was to determine the RX1RII capabilities in real world shooting under some extreme conditions, not a traditional lab review with test charts.

While light was at a premium, what was available (about 5 hours per day around Christmas) was wonderfully diffuse and photography friendly. The weather in Iceland is quite variable with multiple daily changes in climate and conditions as we roamed the countryside. Unfortunately, there was record snow in December and persistent cloud cover so the Aurora Borealis (Northern Lights) were hidden from view, but that didn’t stop us from hitting everything else on the itinerary. With good planning, you can easily maximize the available winter light and complete a full day of activities. Based for part of the trip in a small coastal town named Stokkseyri (pop 445) we managed to drive our rental car to Gulfoss, Seljalandsfoss and Skogafoss waterfalls, the wreckage of an American DC-3 on the black sand beach of Sólheimasandur, the Dyrhólaey promontory, Vik, Geysir, Seljavallalaug swimming pool, the Jökulsárlón glacial lake area and of course Reykjavik and the Blue Lagoon.

Must click on the photos in this report to view them correctly. Also, all images are from the RX1RII unless noted. Some are from the A7RII. 

Iceland Web-134

Iceland Web-004

Iceland Web-005

Iceland Web-003

Iceland Web-098

Iceland Web-280

Iceland Web-173

Iceland Web-259

Image below…a7RII 50/2 Summitar

Iceland Web-120

Back to the RX1RII Shots

Iceland Web-192

Iceland Web-080

Iceland Web-248

Iceland Web-400

Iceland Web-276

Iceland Web-268

Reflecting back over the week spent with an RX1RII as a primary tool, there are few cameras that would have been more satisfactory for the task of vacation photography in this environment. The compact size allowed for easily accessible stowage in a jacket pocket, a more challenging prospect for big brother a7RII or even the Leica Q. Why was this important? While the camera was well protected from the weather – see below for thoughts on its weather handling – I still wouldn’t want it exposed to the cold and rain if needn’t be. Second, for many activities, not having a camera or bag swinging around or in a difficult to access backpack was a big plus. The fixed lens meant no concern for switching lenses in extreme cold, humid or dusty conditions and by using a small hood I was able to keep most of the foul weather off the front lens element. The RX is also by nature of its small size and with the new flip screen, extremely inconspicuous, perfect for street scenes and easy low perspective photography.

Iceland Web-161

Iceland Web-128

Iceland Web-183

Using the RX1RII in the field is a significant improvement over the first generation in terms of user interface and speed of operation although the speed of image review is rather sluggish. I’d like Sony to take note of what some competitors do to increase the appearance of playback speed – immediately display a low resolution JPEG image when you hit the play button as the buffer clears and the higher resolution RAW becomes available. This is a nice trick that would make playback more responsive.

Iceland Web-335

Iceland Web-151

Iceland Web-233

Iceland Web-230

Iceland Web-214

Iceland Web-258

Autofocus is greatly improved over the original RX1 with advanced modes like object tracking and eye-AF that are not just gimmicks to be ignored. Being able to lock-on to my subject’s eyes or face with the push of the button is a useful feature that enables a more effortless and accurate off-center composition, compared to a traditional focus and re-compose technique. Sony claims a 30% improvement in AF speed and that figure feels about right – maybe 40-50% in some circumstances. Really we are at a level of AF performance with these cameras that is beyond good enough for most purposes.

Iceland Web-325

Iceland Web-336

Iceland Web-293

Since the majority of my work takes place in front of a music stage, I don’t normally expose my gear to the elements in a way they were in Iceland. Both the a7RII and the RX1RII were used unprotected in significant exposures to rain, snow, waterfall spray and sub freezing temperatures. I came away with new found confidence in the weather handling capabilities of these cameras. On the RX1RII I even used the EVF in the rain which I was initially worried would expose the camera to water due to the pop-up mechanism. The one criticism I can lay on the RX is the poor battery performance in cold weather. The little battery just couldn’t hold the juice when the temperature dropped below the freezing point. With a pocketful of spares, I never ran out of power but the hassle of swapping batteries in -15 C was not an overly pleasant experience. There are solutions available, such as using an external power pack via USB and I may look closer at those options if I was to use the camera extensively in such cold environments again. Comparatively, the a7RII battery held up quite well and I never once had to change it in the field.

Iceland Web-304

Rx1RII Gulfoss-001

Iceland Web-107

Iceland Web-285

Iceland Web-330

Iceland Web-261

The Zeiss Sonnar 35mm f2 lens that the public and reviewers raved about in the original RX1 makes a return in the new camera matched to the resolving power of the 42mp sensor first introduced in the a7RII. The Zeiss was magic on the original and none of that mojo has been lost on the RX1RII. The Zeiss renders almost like a Planar design, with softer/smooth bokeh, while retaining a Sonnar’s critical sharpness in the center wide open and across the field when stopped down – an almost perfect recipe for a 35mm lens. No one should call this Zeiss clinical, but rather images have an organic feel that is hard to come by in modern designs. The lens appears to be resolving every single one of those 42mp, especially evident in scenes with a distant subject such as a landscape. I am simply staggered by the level of detail this combination is resolving in many of the Iceland scenes. Even more impressive was the few handheld panoramics I attempted. The results were beyond expectations; the 42mp sensor in the tiny RX1RII is capable of generating impressive high megapixel stitched images. One shot on the Svínafellsjökull glacier tongue resulted in a 162mp file with levels of detail unheard of in a camera this size.

Iceland Web-169

Iceland Web-206

Image below…Sony a7RII 50/2 Summitar

Iceland Web-131

A7RII and 12mm Zeiss Touit

Iceland Web-196

Iceland Web-342

Iceland Web-337

Iceland Web-093

All images here are shot in RAW so I can’t comment on JPEG performance but working with the Sony files in post is a pleasure. Dynamic range is as expected – stellar – and having continuity between my a7RII and the RX1RII is a big deal as it can be a challenge to match output on a shoot from different camera models. Color is subjective and easily manipulated but I enjoy working with the base Sony color space. So far there haven’t been any surprises or ugliness in terms of how the files react to edits -no artifacts or banding, just rich malleable data.

Iceland Web-228

Iceland Web-016

Iceland Web-200

Iceland Web-037

To wrap it up, if I measure the RX1RII based on the resultant images, the satisfaction while using it and the desire to keep using it, this field test in Iceland can only be categorized as a success. As groundbreaking as the original RX1 was, expectations were high for the new camera and if my experience can be used as an indication, Sony delivered a worthy successor.

Camera talk aside, I hope it is obvious that we fell in love with beauty of Iceland. Thanks to Steve for sharing our little trip and if interested please visit my site where I have a full day-by-day travelogue with details of each stop.



  1. I too am looking to swap-out my current set up of the a7R mk1 with the Zeiss Biogon 35mm ZM f2 with a Novoflex adaptor to this RXR1 mk2 camera, but truth be told, the photos are not helping me as the PP seems inconsistent across the board; sorry. Is the lighting the issue or are you adjusting lots of settings in PP per image?

    Like you, I have tried the 6 bit Leica glass on the a7R, and wide open, it really is not a good mating, even opened up, 35mm f1.4, it’s not the right glass in my opinion, better from f4+ though the 50mm f.1.4 is better I grant you. The 28mm f2.8 is dire! Again, this seems a well documented failed relationship now between the two, which should work, but doesn’t, hence my shift from the Leica glass to the Zeiss for the Sony.

  2. Beautiful, I can’t wait for mine to arrive, but waiting lists for this camera are long! I have ditched my DSLR gear to specialise because I am at a stage I am bored with carrying the weight and want to get back to basics, and I am genuinely excited about shooting with this little guy… Thanks for a good real world insight, useful.

  3. You say, “No one should call this Zeiss clinical, but rather images have an organic feel that is hard to come by in modern designs”. And that is indeed the quality that struck me most in your excellent pictures. Up until now, examples I’ve seen on the web made me worry that the files were very soft; but what you have succeeded in showing is all the detail you might wish for is there, it’s just that the overall effect is more filmic than from any digital camera – outside medium format – that I’ve seen up until now.
    I think Sony (with the help of your work!) have just secured another sale.

  4. I almost never comment on photos here on anywhere online – > but for me the best compositions were the portrait of your son eating his cereal by the window (love the lighting!), and the plane on the beach are really worth a mention! nice work!

  5. I keep returning to this post Chad – there’s real poetry in you and your subject and this camera transcribes.

  6. Chat, great shots and congrats in the new camera. I have a short question: the 162mp panorama you mentioned, how many shots needed, and was it directly in camera or what external app did you use for the stitching? I ask this because I am yet to find an app that can really stich perfectly large file photos without obvious obvious flaws or working stably on Windows 64bit (I’m on 64bit Windows 7). Thanks again for the photos and great article:)

    • 18-frames with considerable overlap on each frame. Shot in RAW and converted using the photo merge function of LR which resulted in the 162mp DNG file that I then processed. I can’t find a single stitching error. I even did a shot of the ocean with sets of waves coming in – thinking there was no way it was going to look right – it did.

  7. Firstly…fantastic shots! I shoot almost all film these days after a decade on digital but the RX1 series is VERY tempting with its lens and compact size and amazing sensor – looks just beautiful too.

    I’ve always wanted to go to Iceland and will make it someday – it’s probably the last country I haven’t been to yet that I really want to visit and shoot.

    Of course you have a great eye so you could make these image theoretically with any camera but if you’re going to shoot, why not do it in style 🙂

  8. Lovely pictures. Out of interest, do you use alienskin or vsco? Would love any tips as I love the colour post-production particularly.. I use VSCO and currently trying to perfect my own presets to get the right balance between a retro film look and a fairly accurate presentation of colour / sharpness… Cheers

  9. Great reportage style, i.e. images and text. Enjoyed the read, thank you. And yes the RX1rII is an IQ monster thanks to its stellar sensor, processor & lens combo.

  10. What about the software interface? I read that the predecessor had sluggish OS, so don’t expect to be able to switch the camera on and take photos immediately. Did you find that to be a concern?

  11. Nice pictures and an amazing place. Do you think that the lack of the IS might be a problem? Thanks

  12. Thanks for super range of photos. It’s great to see (a) colour, (b) distance, (c) depth of field. A constant stream of B&W closeups all shot at f2 can get a bit much for people like me who take homely pics of people and travel. 😉 Still can’t get RX1RII in UK 🙁

    • You now know you want what ? The Images i see here are heavily processed. Some look like old film photos, some more modern, some differ again. In short nothing that gives a clear view on what this camera can do. But it shows what this guy can do in post – and that is not bad 😉

Comments are closed.