The Voigtlander 35 f/2 Ultron Review. Vintage Perfection.

The Voigtlander 35 f/2 Ultron Review. Vintage Perfection.

By Steve Huff

I loved this lens so much for its small size, vintage character and build that I now own one. It came from CameraQuest HERE. 

So I have had this tiny jewel like lens for a couple of months now and have been enjoying it from time to time, taking it out either on a Leica SL or Panasonic S1 via a Leica M to L mount adapter. First things first! This lens will not compete with uber modern day sharp as a tac “perfection” lenses. It will not compete in sharpness with a modern day Leica Summicron ASPH. Instead this little $799 lens that has a classic vintage design and vibe is meant to render your images in a way that take you back to a time when lenses had character and style instead of perfection and an analytic draw. I know many photographers LOVE analytical, sharp, uber detailed…me, I always have enjoyed character much more than perfection. In my opinion, it makes your images stand out more in certain situations like street photography or travel photography. I have also seen prints shot with lenses that give preference to character over all out sharpness that have invoked a more emotional response from the person viewing the image. Many of us have an emotional response to vintage or the past, and this lens helps bring that mojo to modern day photography.

My Video on the 35 Ultron

Now many of you will say “But I heard this lens is as sharp as the newest Leica 35 Cron”..and to that I say, again, it is not but this is a good thing. The Leica renders in a much more analytical more sterile way where this lens offered as much sharpness as one would need but with more character and life…more rounded in its rendering. Yes, I actually prefer this lens to a modern day Leica Summicron ASPH. It’s much more like an older version of the 35 Cron, the pre Asph. THIS is a good thing.

This lens is part of the VINTAGE LINE from Voigtlander and while they are making some STUNNING glass today in the likes of the 40 f1.2 and 50 f1.2 that have a more modern sharpness and bokeh, this lens is going to be put on your camera when you want a small lens that packs some vintage character, and by vintage I do not mean soft, mushy or with bad color. I mean there is something about this lens that reminds me of shooting film, probably because the rendering takes me back to that time when film was hot, and these were the kind of lenses many of us shot. A small fast prime. When you go into low light territory where you get some grain from your cameras sensor, it really takes me back to the old film days. It’s also vintage in appearance and build, which is actually why voigtlander calls it the Vintage Line. Pure retro design and style and when people on the street approach you after seeing it, they will ask you “What lens is THAT”?!? Happened to me twice now.

Two shots below, taken at night on the street. The Voigtlander 35 f/2 Ultron and the Panasonic S1 cranked to ISO 12800. The 1st image (click on it to really see how this lens renders) is the full frame shot. The second is a crop of the image. Not sure which I liked more so I posted both here. This also gives you a chance to see how this lens renders. It’s modern yet classic and GREAT for black and white tones, which I found to be one of this lenses strengths. With the DR of this camera and the character of the lens it so reminds me of shooting B&W film. Lovely tones. Sharp yet rounded. Not sterile in any way.

Build and Size

The Voigtlander 35 Ultron is tiny. It has a little focus lever that you use to focus and it’s a joy to use. Not everyone enjoys these levers but I love when these small lenses have them as it makes it much easier to nail focus. Having a lens of this size means your camera (no matter which one you shoot the lens on) will be lighter and smaller as well. Shooting this on a Leica M or on something like the Leica SL or Panasonic S1 is so awesome to shoot but it will be most at home on a Leica M. As I shot it on the SL and S1, I enjoyed the huge EVF experience but would also adore this lens on an M, without question. It feels like it is made for a Leica M6 or M7 or even the newer M10. Would make a sleek vintage combo.

Vintage Perfection

We do NOT all need perfection in lenses as when we chase perfection we end up with huge lenses, expensive lenses and a look that over time we may tire of. I know I do. I used to buy lenses that were expensive, large and rendered my images with everything perfect. I still love some of those lenses… the small ones like the Leica 50 APO and the much less expensive Voigtlander 50 f/3.5 that renders a lot like that Leica 50 APO. But, the large lenses…I am over those. I think that for what I shoot, which is low light club musicians and street scenes (most of the time) I will stick with small fast prime’s. Over the last year or two I have fallen in love with what Voigtlander has been doing as they have been bringing us some remarkable lenses for amazing prices.

I’ve realized I do not need or want perfection as in reality, it doesn’t matter. Someone looking at a print is not even going to notice if you used a $6,000 lens or a $500 lens. It’s the image that matters and not the lens. It really is. In these days of the smartphone taking over photography (and for good reason, as modern day phones are crazy good) I still love shooting a real camera. Having real controls. Taking hold of a lens to manually focus it instead of letting the camera do everything for me. For me, this makes photography more exciting, more challenging and more fun. This is why I love shooting with lenses such as this one and why this lens is sort of a “Vintage Perfection”. It’s more than good enough to compete with modern lenses yet offers some vintage charm in not only the design but the output..again, not in softness but in “roundness” which is what I call NOT sterile or analytical.

Click the images for larger. All three were shot on the Panasonic S1 (review here). The second image was shot in near darkness at ISO 25k. All images here shot wide open at f/2 as this is where a lens like this gives you its full character! 

Priced Right

This lens, like most Voigtlander lenses is priced right. At only $799 brand new, this lens is a value if you are a fan of this kind of look and style. If you are a fan of manual focus and small lenses that are built very well. Make no mistake, this lens feels just as solid and good as any Leica 35mm lens, and in some cases, it feels more solid. Take for example the Leica 35 Summarit. To me, this lens feels better, looks better and offers more character while coming in at less than half the cost! The Summarit is a gorgeous lens, and it has its charms as well because it is not one of those all out perfect lenses but for value, it’s tough to beat Voigtlander. I will say the Summarit is a top notch lens though and will offer a more contrasty and crisp rendering while still giving some beautiful bokeh.

Images 1-3 were shot on the Leica SL, the 4th was on the S1

This is a short review as it is a simple lens. Here are some words from the CameraQuest website about this lens:

  • Classical retro styling reminiscent of the 1950s
  • Small compact size, weighing only 6 oz
  • The smallest 35/2 Leica M mount lens in current production
  • Retro styled focusing knob
  • Element with aspherical surfaces ensures excellent performance
  •  Extremely solid and durable all-metal barrel
  • Manual focus for precise focusing
  • Aperture mechanism with 10 aperture blades for beautiful bokeh
  • Convenient and popular 39mm filter size
  • Easily adaptable to all digital mirrorless cameras with proper lens adapter
  • Optional LH-11 Bayonet On Lens Hood

I do have the hood with mine and love it. It adds to the retro charm of the lens. I highly recommend picking up the hood with the lens (see the hood here). 

Tech Specs:

Focal Length: 35mm
Aperture Ratio: 1:2
Minimum Aperture: F16
Lens Construction: 5 Groups 8 Elements
Angle of View: 62.5°
Aperture Blade: 10
Minimum Focus: 0.58m
Rangefinder Coupling: Infinity ~ 0.7m(Depend on camera body used)
Filter Size: Φ39
Diameter X Length: Φ52mm x 28.1mm
Weight: 6oz

Final Thoughts…

I adore this lens. It may not be one of those that will be one of my all time favorites (but maybe it will as after a few more days with it after writing this review I have truly fallen in love with this lens) but for street, low light and overall plain fun this is a lens that can rock on MANY cameras. The Leica SL, the Panasonic S1, the Sony A7 or A9 series, Leica M and even a Nikon Z or Canon EOS-R. I have tested these lenses on the Sony’s, the Canon and of course the SL and M and S1. As for mirrorless, I love the Panasonic S1 with these kinds of lenses as I do not see most of the issues I see when using them on other cameras. For example, this lens was unusable for me on the Canon EOS-R. It had massive vignetting and just did not look right at all. On the Sony’s it did good but not as good as it does on the M or SL or S1. But at the end of the day these newer Mirrorless cameras are awesome because we can experiment with lenses, and something like this may even help to get you out of a creative rut. Put it on the camera and take control instead of having the camera take over. I think you will find it refreshing and with a classic like this it will not break the bank.

The truth is we do not need to spend thousands on a 35mm f/2 lens in M mount. Doing so may bring you a 5-10% difference, but that will not make your images any better. That has to come from within you, and this is a lens that can help you do just that.

You can read more about this lens at CameraQuest.com HERE. It’s where mine came from! BTW, the 4th image below was shot on the S1 at ISO 51,200 and is a pretty severe crop. As you can see I was shooting in some crazy low light here!


PLEASE! I NEED YOUR HELP TO KEEP THIS WEBSITE RUNNING, IT IS SO EASY AND FREEE for you to HELP OUT!

Hello to all! For the past 10+ years I have been running this website and it has grown to beyond my wildest dreams. Running this site costs quite a bit of cash every single month and on top of that, I work full-time 60+ hours a week on it each and every single day of the week (I receive 100-300 emails a DAY) and am only a one man operation. Because of this, I could use YOUR help to cover my costs for this free information that is provided on a daily basis. 

To help out it is simple, and no, I am not asking you for a penny!!

If you ever decide to make a purchase from B&H Photo or Amazon, for ANYTHING, even diapers..you can help me without spending a penny to do so. If you use my links to make your purchase (when you click a link here and it takes you to B&H or Amazon, that is using my links as once there you can buy anything and I will get a teeny small credit) you will in turn be helping this site to keep on going and keep on growing.

Not only do I spend money on fast hosting but I also spend it on cameras to buy to review, lenses to review, bags to review, gas and travel, and a slew of other things. You would be amazed at what it costs me just to maintain this website, in money and time.

So all I ask is that if you find the free info on this website useful AND you ever need to make a purchase at B&H Photo or Amazon, just use the links below. You can even bookmark the Amazon link (not the B&H) and use it anytime you buy something. It costs you nothing extra but will provide me and this site with a dollar or two to keep on trucking along.

AMAZON LINK (you can bookmark this one)

B&H PHOTO LINK – (not bookmark able) Can also use my search bar on the right side or links within reviews, anytime.

Outside of the USA? Use my worldwide Amazon links HERE!

You can also follow me on Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube. 😉

Love you all, and thank you for sticking with me since 2008!

23 Comments

  1. Hi Steve, could you comment on differences between this and the 35 lux? Other than the size and the massive price difference, is the main difference wide aperture and sharpness with the lux? Or is Lux also better at 3d pop whether at 1.4 or f2

    • The Lux will offer a more shallow DOF, offer cooler colors and have a bit more 3 dimensionality. But it is much more expensive and also quite a bit larger. Lenses are like the paintbrush, and they all “paint” in a slightly different way. But really, both are capable lenses that can create a great photograph. The Lux will perform better on an M10 as it is coded so the camera will fix any issues.

  2. I compared exactly these 2 lenses recently, biogon and ultron 35 on an M9-p. The biogon didn’t get me excited. The ultron has more character for sure, still being sharp and lovely colours.

  3. It would be awesome to have an M10 shoot out between this lens and the various 35/2 lenses: ASPH, ZM 35/2, V 35/1.7, etc.

  4. What are your thoughts comparing this lens to the Voigtlander 35mm f/2.5?
    I have that lens and wonder if there would be any reason to upgrade it?

  5. Thinking about getting the 35mm Ultron f/2 or the 40mm f/1.2 Nokton. Still cannot decide which one to get. Voigtländer is really awesome these days.

  6. Great review and timing this lens is so tempting.
    Can we expect similar ; minus the bokeh with the Vintage line 21mm Skopar.
    This lens (35mm Ultron),the 21mm Skopar and the 50mm 1.5 Vintage line Nokton could make an interesting three lens setup.
    Thanks for all your work.

    • My 21 3.5 review is coming soon. Shooting with it now, and it does well on the S1 without any issues. It reminds me of the Leica 28 5.6 Summaron a bit in design and build. I have the 21 3.5, this 35 Ultron and the 50 1.2 Nokton which is another beautiful lens. I will also buy the new 75 1.5 when it comes out…soon!

  7. Hi Steve,

    appreciate this review! Really love the rendering of your images taken with the Ultron 35 2.0.

    How do you think does it compare with the Ultron 35 1.7 ? Especially in terms of classical look, rendering, character etc. ?

    Do you have experience with the Ultron 35 2.0 on the Sony A7 III oder A7R III ?

    Best regards from Germany
    Ben

    • Hey Ben,

      The 35 1.7 is also a great lens. A bit larger and different design but a similar vibe, maybe more contrasty if anything. Can’t go wrong with either but this one is smaller and looks more vintage so some may choose based on that. I reviewed the 1.7 a while back and enjoyed it as well. I have not yet tried this on a Sony as I no longer own a Sony camera. I may pick up an A7III soon though just to review these lenses on as many bodies as I can. Thanks.

    • Well, it has been a long time since I shot with the Zeiss but I did like that lens as it had the Zeiss colors. But it’s an f/2.8 lens vs this one which is an f/2. Different vibe, and I feel this one renders in a more classic way.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.